Jump to content

Where Does the M11 Put the S?


John Smith

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

When Leica introduced the M10R, I suggested that it was the M, not the S that was driving innovation. Well, I got pilloried for that. "Technology always flows down from the S to the SL to the M," yada yada yada. So, question is, where does the M11 put the S now? It has just about as many megapixels as the S3 and has moved closer to its mirrorless brethren. Peter Karbe said in a Leica Australia video that Leica is looking at making everything smaller. You think this is it for the S line? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, frame-it said:

60mp on a 35mm sensor is not the same as 60+mp on a medium format sensor.

if Leica are sticking with Sony sensors, then who knows..maybe the S4 will be 100+mp?

 

Maybe not. But if you were Leica, would you be more interested in expanding a 61MP 35mm/35mm APO mirrorless combination or trying to reinvigorate a mirrored system? I'm not knocking the S system. It's a legitimate question. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was getting interested in the M11, then I saw a shot on DPReview taken at 12,500 ISO - it looked terrible at 100%, nothing like what I would have expected from my several years old S(007)...

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/5740841570/leica-m11-pre-production-sample-gallery-dpreview-tv/0196737996

john

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dsauro said:

Leica Rumours has an article suggesting new camera’s being announced in 2022..including the SL, Q and S!  This could be very exciting.

Yes, I just saw that. You can barely see a card by the S on the upper righthand corner. If that's the case, I'm all in. Leica is much more ambitious than I thought.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

25 minutes ago, John McMaster said:

I was getting interested in the M11, then I saw a shot on DPReview taken at 12,500 ISO - it looked terrible at 100%, nothing like what I would have expected from my several years old S(007)...

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/5740841570/leica-m11-pre-production-sample-gallery-dpreview-tv/0196737996

john

The 007 is very good, even said to have better DR than the S3 on PtoP. But I doubt that Leica will continue with the S as a mirrored system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dpreview has a long history of making Leica's look bad. Remember the model with tiny hands holding the original SL? It looked like a FUJI GX680! I would also try to avoid comparing different resolution cameras at 100%. Having said all that, I'd still prefer the S(007) to any FF sensor camera ever built.

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John Smith said:

When Leica introduced the M10R, I suggested that it was the M, not the S that was driving innovation. Well, I got pilloried for that. "Technology always flows down from the S to the SL to the M," yada yada yada. So, question is, where does the M11 put the S now? It has just about as many megapixels as the S3 and has moved closer to its mirrorless brethren. Peter Karbe said in a Leica Australia video that Leica is looking at making everything smaller. You think this is it for the S line? 

Wasn't the point that S has a sensor size not used by anyone else? Therefore, to reduce the cost, the sensor waffle made for S has also been used for M. As I understand it, S006 and M9, S007 and M240, and S3 and M10R share sensors.M11 uses, again as I understand it, a 'commercially' available (Sony) sensor, whereas S4 or whatever may or may not be in the pipeline.

As long as Leica sticks to the original S sensor size, the next incarnation of S requires another specially made sensor. If not shared with M or SL or CL, the sensor expenses will be very high. The above is my understanding, but I could very well be wrong...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, helged said:

Wasn't the point that S has a sensor size not used by anyone else? Therefore, to reduce the cost, the sensor waffle made for S has also been used for M. As I understand it, S006 and M9, S007 and M240, and S3 and M10R share sensors.M11 uses, again as I understand it, a 'commercially' available (Sony) sensor, whereas S4 or whatever may or may not be in the pipeline.

As long as Leica sticks to the original S sensor size, the next incarnation of S requires another specially made sensor. If not shared with M or SL or CL, the sensor expenses will be very high. The above is my understanding, but I could very well be wrong...

If it is mirrorless they can use 100M Sony sensor  that all s glasses will cover it just fine. A brilliant one with lower cost ( I would believe). 
 

S glass may get a boost when that coming:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ZHNL said:

If it is mirrorless they can use 100M Sony sensor  that all s glasses will cover it just fine. A brilliant one with lower cost ( I would believe). 
 

S glass may get a boost when that coming:)

+1. (but do we want a mirrorless S more than an S with optical viewfinder?) 

Edited by helged
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, djmay said:

Where did you get this information about M11 Sony sensor ? I doubt it comes from a person, who knows.

Only what people tend to believe, from the 6k postings on the M11 thread. So the sensor could be from many manufacturers, whereas the S sensor is not an off-the-shelf product. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...