Jump to content

Leica M11: A Revolution – Review by Elmar S.


elmars

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

vor 1 Minute schrieb duoenboge:

The M11 always shoots at 64MP. The other resolutions are internally simulated.
I have a few questions about this:
1. Same low light performance as 64 MP for all resolutions? No advantages with 36MP or 18MP. Is that correct?
2. The same for the risk of camera shake with longer focal lengths! No advantages with 36MP or 18MP. Is that correct?
3. Sensitivity to diffraction errors with small apertures the same as with 64MP! No advantages with 36MP or 18MP. Is that correct?
What are the advantages of this effort? Smaller Datafiles with 36 or 18MP?

For that they could have built a camera with a 36MP sensor right away.

 

They put the S3 sensor in it now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

elmars

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

M11 a revolution? Of course this is a bit ironic. Nobody dies in this revolution but the traditional baseplate of the digital M cameras, that omitted with the M11. For
LUF Admin

Short notice from the admin: User Łëïčä is banned. Was the – uhm let me count – 4th account of a banned member. Andreas

elmars

I decided to get tough like a craftsman. I will carry the M11 with this:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

And if I have something to nail (for example the focus) I take the M11 out and nail

Posted Images

Thank you for the review Elmars.  I have a question about how the M11 shutter "feels".  I have the M10-M and M10-R today, so those are my current reference points.  If shooting with the OVF (no EVF, no LV), then it's business as usual with the quiet shutter first used in the M10-P.

With the M11 and shooting in the same manner, shutter has to close, do a capture cycle, then re-open.  That's double the physical activity (vs the M10).  How would you describe the M11's shutter experience in terms of lag, vibration, cadence/timing and noise?  I'm struggling to understand how this can be better than the M10...

And second question, do you happen to know why Leica did not do Electronic First Curtain Shutter?  This seems such an obvious solution. Or perhaps Jono is a better person to answer this since it seems he was more involved during the latter development.  

Edited by John Black
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 41 Minuten schrieb duoenboge:

1. Same low light performance as 64 MP for all resolutions? No advantages with 36MP or 18MP. Is that correct?
2. The same for the risk of camera shake with longer focal lengths! No advantages with 36MP or 18MP. Is that correct?
3. Sensitivity to diffraction errors with small apertures the same as with 64MP! No advantages with 36MP or 18MP. Is that correct?

1. Yes. Same results as the guys from RedDotForum, so I heard on their live show a few minutes ago. But these results came out from a early version of the firmware. Leica states better noise results at lower resolution an higher dynamic range. So perhaps they worked on this at the final firmware. (They usually work on the firmware after the end of the betatests).

2. Yes

3. Sorry I don´t know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

vor 3 Minuten schrieb John Black:

And second question, do you happen to know why Leica did not do Electronic First Curtain Shutter?

Sorry, I don´t know.

vor 4 Minuten schrieb John Black:

How would you describe the M11's shutter experience in terms of lag, vibration, cadence/timing and noise?

This was a big discussion at the beta-testers. Noise is the same. The shutter operation is more complex so we thought at first it must be slower. Leica says it is the same due to their measurements. Jono and me think this is right. So says our practice and practical comparison with both cameras. Jono made a kind of measuring with his possibilities too. After a short time You get used to the different cadence of the shutter.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 7 Minuten schrieb elmars:

Sorry, I don´t know.

This was a big discussion at the beta-testers. Noise is the same. The shutter operation is more complex so we thought at first it must be slower. Leica says it is the same due to their measurements. Jono and me think this is right. So says our practice and practical comparison with both cameras. Jono made a kind of measuring with his possibilities too. After a short time You get used to the different cadence of the shutter.

Here a confirmation from Sean Reid:

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, elmars said:

Shutter sound

But there is no free lunch.

After spending a couple of hours reading both your great reviews, joining the Leica UK launch webinar and reading other comments, this is where my mind has the greatest worries. What has happened to the traditional Leica 'snick' as you press the release? Can it still be a M if it doesn't sound the same? If it sounds as you describe it ("a short, very fast rumbling") will this be so existentially disturbing that one can't actually take pictures?

This is written very much tongue in cheek - but not entirely. I'm going to have to go and listen to it. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of days ago, I was thinking about the M11 and what we knew about it at that point in time; it occurred to me that it would not be going too far to call the new M flagship revolutionary.  The information we got from Wetzlar and the reviews that have been posted bear this out.

Back when the M10 Monochrom was released, I posted "Leica has turned the world of photography upside down" or words to that effect.

Leica has clearly done it again.

Edited by Herr Barnack
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 4 Minuten schrieb LocalHero1953:

After spending a couple of hours reading both your great reviews, joining the Leica UK launch webinar and reading other comments, this is where my mind has the greatest worries. What has happened to the traditional Leica 'snick' as you press the release? Can it still be a M if it doesn't sound the same? If it sounds as you describe it ("a short, very fast rumbling") will this be so existentially disturbing that one can't actually take pictures?

This is written very much tongue in cheek - but not entirely. I'm going to have to go and listen to it. 

Don´t worry about this. It is the same kind of sound, but more complex (because of more operation) in a very short time; Leica speeded it up very much. After a short while You get used to the different cadence of the shutter. You will not remember the difference.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, elmars said:

Don´t worry about this. It is the same kind of sound, but more complex (because of more operation) in a very short time; Leica speeded it up very much. After a short while You get used to the different cadence of the shutter. You will not remember the difference.

I'll lie awake in bed worrying about it till I can hear it for myself😊

  • Like 2
  • Haha 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, John Black said:

And second question, do you happen to know why Leica did not do Electronic First Curtain Shutter?  This seems such an obvious solution. Or perhaps Jono is a better person to answer this since it seems he was more involved during the latter development.  

Interesting question indeed @jonoslack! Maybe something can be patched later on. I still need to listen to the sound, maybe it's not worth the worries 🙃!

Thanks for the great review!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very interested in trying that camera out. But I have to admit, that I am even more disappointed after seeing the keynote. The new shutter design is not mentioned, and it actually looks like and even sounds like the one from the M10P - which is not a bad thing in general. You can clearly hear the sound in a YouTube video from mathphotographer (starting sound of the camera) and when Ralph Gibson is photographing with the M11. It is, like @steven pointed out, like an M10P in a permanent LV mode. And - even though I can understand some of the hype (I even know people using an M camera just with the Visoflex...but that's a different chapter) - I am deeply disappointed.

Some of the soul left the M...most of you won't focus on the shutter sound or the whole mechanical working: hence it is for sure the best M camera money can buy. I have to get over it, but it will take time...!

Edited by BJohn
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, elmars said:

Sorry, I don´t know.

This was a big discussion at the beta-testers. Noise is the same. The shutter operation is more complex so we thought at first it must be slower. Leica says it is the same due to their measurements. Jono and me think this is right. So says our practice and practical comparison with both cameras. Jono made a kind of measuring with his possibilities too. After a short time You get used to the different cadence of the shutter.

Thank you for replying.

I'm not worried about the sound, it's the timing and physical sensation (tactile feedback).  The cadence and physical sensation with the M10-P/R/M when using LV or EVF is awkward.  I'll think the camera is done taking a shot, but it's still finishing up its work.  So when shooting with the EVF on the M10-R, etc., I have to make an extra to freeze for an added second to hopefully avoid adding some camera shake into the capture.  It feels very awkward compared to more casual flow with the OVF.

I'm guessing if it was horrible, then reviewers would delicately broach the topic.  So the lack of discussion - I'm hoping - means it's a non issue.  I had pre-order placed awhile back, so one or another I'll find out firsthand :) 

On a slightly different topic, in the DP Review video, they said the shutter was the original M10 shutter.  Then Leica Miami (David & Josh) said the shutter was the newer version used in the M10-M/R/P.  Do you know who is correct?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...