Jump to content

What do you want in the next digital M?

IkarusJohn

By IkarusJohn
in Leica M (Type 240 / 262)

 Share

Recommended Posts

lct

lct

Posted
Posted

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Makes little sense to compare M to SL bodies indeed. What some people would like is a rangefinder w/o the drawbacks of optical rangefinders. Not including me i must say but i would be interested in a digital rangefinder if it is possible to make one.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

mwilliamsphotography
mwilliamsphotography

I've increasing become confused regarding whom a M camera is made for (?).   I've owned and used every standard production iteration of the M since the M4. I went along with the M8, just happy they

Overgaard
Overgaard

As you will notice the Sony has a DMF (Dumb Mother Fucker) and MF (Mother Fucker) choice. I think that is why. I haven't figured out what the AF stands for.     Apart from that, I don't like the f

colonel
colonel

People who post in forums are usually whiners, although this forum is better then most.   Folk enjoying the product are not posting or are using the photo forum. There are a few nutters like me who

Posted Images

cirke

cirke

Posted
Posted

Makes little sense to compare M to SL bodies indeed. What some people would like is a rangefinder w/o the drawbacks of optical rangefinders. Not including me i must say but i would be interested in a digital rangefinder if it is possible to make one.

 

same here 

Link to post
Share on other sites
jaapv

jaapv

Posted
Posted

Makes little sense to compare M to SL bodies indeed. What some people would like is a rangefinder w/o the drawbacks of optical rangefinders. Not including me i must say but i would be interested in a digital rangefinder if it is possible to make one.

It is not really comparing, it is looking for alternatives if a system shows serious drawbacks for the use one intends it for.

Link to post
Share on other sites
lct

lct

Posted
Posted

It is not really comparing [...]

 

Really? ;)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
jmahto

jmahto

Posted
Posted

No it can be bigger  , but a Canon 50 1.4 is not very big

Are you referring to this Canon lens to compare with Leica 50mm 1.4?

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/12140-USA/Canon_2515A003_50mm_f_1_4_USM_Autofocus.html

I cry foul... :(

 

Seriously I would like to know whether they are equivalent in your usage? (I know that in my usage they are not comparable). If they are not equivalent in your usage then the comparison is moot.

Engineering design is all about compromises....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...