Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'm4-p'.
Found 13 results
-
I'm not sure whether I've had bad luck with getting lenses to fit on cameras, or if this is a common problem with the M system. My first Leica combo was an M3 SS with Summicron 50 V2. Since the body and lens shipped together, there was no problem getting them to mount. Next, I purchased an Ultron 28 f2. The lens fit into the mount, but I couldn't get it to click into place. Took it to a repair shop, and the owner basically got the lens to fit through brute force - said Voigtlander QC wasn't great and that this was basically to be expected. I used the lens like this for a couple of months, but it would often "unclick" itself somehow, so I eventually traded it for a LTM Skopar 28mm. Same thing happened with the first adapter - couldn't get it it to click in place. Went back to the shop, and was given a replacement that 'magically' worked without problems. Recently, I traded the M3 for an M4-P and, lo and behold, neither the adapted Voigtlander nor Summicron will even fit into the mount, let alone click. Thus out of 6 total Lens/body combos (2 bodies and 4 lenses/adapters), 4 have been faulty. I'd simply put it down to a service error or wear and tear, but the fact that this has occurred between unrelated lenses and bodies makes me skeptical. Has anyone had a similar experience? Am I doing something wrong?!
-
Hi guys, this is my first post, regarding my first Leica which I bought on Ebay. It was listed as having an issue with 1sec shutter speed being way too fast, which I didn't care much because it is a shutter speed I don't think I am going to use at all. I received the camera, really good cosmetic condition btw, and I noticed that all slow shutter speeds, below 1/30sec were off, way too fast. After googling the problem, I found that that can happen after a long time without being used, and that firing the shutter several times throughout all the shutter speed range might work. So I did it and it worked, for all shutter speeds except 1/8 and 1/30. I compared it side by side with my Canon 7 and they were the same-ish by the naked eye. And now, I have just tried something and if I fire the shutter with the camera upside down, 1/8 sounds ok, halfway between 1/15 and 1/4. And I promise I haven't been drinking or anything 🤨 So, today, I have contacted by email 4 Leica repair shops in the UK. Two of them have replied, one that they cannot do it because they don't have spare parts, and the other that I should return the camera and ask for a refund. So I went to the only Leica repair shop that I know in London, which I am not going to say its name. So, I got there, the guy took the camera, he wasn't listening to what I was saying at first, started firing the shutter and making appreciative faces saying, yes, slow speeds are ok. Until I got him to listen to what I was saying, and then he saw the problem with 1/8 and 1/30. He told me the camera would need servicing (now the finder needed service too because it wasn't a clean view..., but also that they wouldn't probably need any spare parts), which is fine, normal price for a CLA for a Leica. But he also advised I returned the camera to the seller. So I don't really know what to do. The camera has that problem, it looks in good cosmetic condition, and, whatever they say, I been after one of these cameras for like a year, and I have never seen one in this cosmetic condition for less than a grand. And I bought this one for £750. I have asked the seller if they would refund me the cost of the repair, but they haven't said yes, just have asked me to check if I want and let them know. So, what do you guys, as Leica users, think? Just a honest, and blunt if necessary, opinion. Cheers
-
Apologies if there are similar threads to this one - I haven't been able to find answers to my questions specifically. I recently sold my M3 since I'm looking for a body that accommodates wider lenses and has a hotshoe. I don't need a built in meter and am on a budget, so I wouldn't consider the M6. I also find the M5 too bulky, so this leaves the M4-2 and M4-P. I will mainly be shooting 28mm and 35mm lenses, so the M4-P seems ideal since it provides framelines for both. My first question is therefore whether the extra cost is warranted for 28mm framelines, or if I should opt for an M4-2 and use the entire viewfinder to approximate the 28mm focal length. Also, since there are few "user condition" examples of both models available online, I'm wondering how reliable the hotshoe is on these cameras - I use flash a lot and problems in this department would be a total dealbreaker for me. Would it make a tangible difference to opt for a late M4-P, or is it safe to assume that the hotshoe will function well in most cases regardless of model or year? My instincts tell me the M4-P is the ideal camera, but since there are a few M4-2's available for very attractive prices, I'm hoping someone can convince me otherwise!
-
Picked up an M4-P recently, apparently CLA'd in 2020. A few frames from every roll so far have had the left 1/3 or so much darker than the rest of the frame to varying degrees (see examples). I have noticed that this happens only when I shoot in the sun at 1/1000s. I even tested it by shooting the same subject at 1/500s and 1/1000s. The 1/500s was fine while the 1/1000s had the issue. Is this a shutter problem, or am i just clumsy and blocking the lens with my fingers? (Don't mind the banding that was a development issue I have since fixed.)
-
Hello forum members! This is my first post (although I have been lurking around for quite some time). My M4-P (very late serial number 16927xx) has an extra nipple or rivet on the rewind knob side of the body. M3 and M2 bodies, as well as barnack leica's such as the iiif, also seem to have this rivet, but I have never seen it on a M4-P (or M4 for that matter). My questions are: What is the function of this rivet? It does not seem to 'do' or hold anything. What purpose did it serve on the M3/M2? Why does my M4-P have one while it seems to have disappeared from m-bodies since the introduction if the M4?
-
Hi, newcomer here, can anyone advise if there are any problems when using a Minolta rookie lens on an m-mount camera via an adapter? Does the focus work just as it should? I have just picked up an M4-p and am in the process of deciding which summicron I would like so I want to use my Minolta MD mount glass in the meantime. Thanks in advance for any info.
-
Taken on Leica M4-P and 35mm Summicron f2.5 lens using Kodak T-Max 400 film. No metering done. Film was lab processed. Gerry
- 7 replies
-
- 13
-
-
- street photography
- black and white
- (and 6 more)
-
Hi, can anyone recommend any good quality straps that include the protection flaps that go over the attachment points. Ideally under £50 and available in the uk. many thanks, Dan
-
I think this mostly ignored gem of a special edition (prices indicate so) deserves its own thread. Especially with the L/E/I/C/A 001-500 and its 2500 pieces of silver M4-P bodies that somehow ended up being quite higher in numbers than promised and the "Napoleonic" engravers' mistake of "1813-1983" cameras... Plus all the special editon lenses and an engraved winder that - combined together - made this special edition so cool... The last Midlands M camera before M6 and the Canadian Leica "swan song", the last goodbye...
- 21 replies
-
- 11
-
-
- m4-p
- m4-p canada
- (and 6 more)
-
It’s only my 2nd roll of film through the camera, so it’s probably a user error. I rewound a roll of Kodak Tri-X (36 exp) film today on my M4-P. During the rewind I could feel the tension on he film being rewound and then it went slack. Thinking the film had been rewound into the canister I opened up the bottom plate. To my surprise the film hadn’t been fully rewound. I reattached the bottom plate and started rewinding again, feeling the tension again. Once I felt the tension release I was able to remove the film as normal. Did I do something wrong? Has anyone had this issue and is there a solution?
-
We are not that far down the road to hell with regard to AI and it appears than an increasing number of people are through with AI, photographers in particular. I love my M10 Monochrom and Q2 - and the stunning prints (other people's words, not self aggrandizement) that they can produce. As for AI imaging, my interest level is significantly lower than my interest in having an intimate physical relationship with a farm animal. This essay has me thinking that it's past time to dust off my M4-P, film developing kit and the ziploc bag full of Tri-X in my gear cabinet.
- 6 replies
-
- 5
-
-
-
- film photography
- ai
- (and 5 more)
-
Hello, I just got a mint condition M4-P from a reputable seller. Looks excellent except there is some haze in the viewfinder. It's not noticeable when looking through it but this is when pointing a strong light on it. The seller said it's not hazy enough to justify a cleaning and it's a common issue on this camera (but it was not advertised). Do you think it is cleanable with CLA or is it something more serious like a semi transparent mirror issue ? I keep it if I can service it but if it's unreparable or if it cost half the camera, I don't want to. Thank you for your help and merry Christmas :)
-
Hey, I recently picked up a mint condition Leica M4-P. Inspected the body and it's pretty close to flawless and no large dings or dents. However the eyepiece seems like it's not centered properly horizontally. It this normal or is this a problem with my camera that needs to be fixed? Hoping someone can help me with this! Thanks
