Jump to content

SL Woes


Chris W

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

13 hours ago, Chris W said:

Hmm, it's hard to know.

I had a 14 day window to return the camera and that has long gone. There is a 6 month warranty.

I switched to electronic shutter (which I'm not a huge fan of), tested using hand held AND a tripod. There is not much difference between the two.

Autofocus and manual.

If I zoom in on one of my M240 shots, at 200%, I can still see sharp aspects. If I look at an SL shot, it looks in focus zoomed out, my editor (Capture One) focus mask indicates parts of the image are in focus, but when I zoom in it seems a bit soft to me. Or if there are sharp elements, they are fewer than I would expect at f5.6.

 

I've been assuming user error, which is why I didn't return the camera immediately.

 

It is likely that the 14 day window relates to a return because you don’t like the camera. It would be disingenuous to limit a return period to 14 days when a camera is plain faulty. Why are you persevering? Are you avoiding confrontation or disappointment (understandable but not warranted)? Just return it. 

Edited by Mute-on
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm avoiding returning it because I actually want to use the camera. I usually presume user error, lack of experience with a new system before I presume something is faulty.

The well known dealer rated it as 9 - excellent.

I was wondering how I could resolve it and realised I could test against my full frame Sigma FP.

I guess it's no surprise the SL shows up any inadequacies in the Sigma 45mm lens, although it is reputed to be very sharp. My M mount 50mm is sharp on the SL even with manual focussing. The Sigma 45mm has a quicker sharpness fall off, and my impression is that the SL is not focussing EXACTLY at the point I'm aiming. Maybe the single point focus on the SL is still somewhat wide?

On the FP, my 45mm is sharp and across a larger focus plane. The M mount 50mm lens a bit less sharp, probably due to my manual focus inaccuracy.

Compared to the FP, the SL is not blowing me away. I prefer my M240, but for some jobs I need an auto-focussing camera with a mechanical shutter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris W,   Both myself at post #6 and Helged at his post #8, Trickness at his post #20 and others gave you very sound advice based on extensive experience with the SL system.  Your SL should create tack sharp images no matter with AF or manual focus, Leica brand or third party lenses.  Your lenses are not the problem, nor technique...the camera is defective, return it and get another one or an SL2 from a Leica dealer. MBP sold you a defective used SL camera body, it happens.  Once you get another SL or SL2 then go out and create some excellent photographs rather than waste your time wondering if it is you.   r/ Mark

Edited by LeicaR10
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

A few thoughts.

  • Have you asked Leica Service about the history of your camera? Maybe it has a history of problems, or it is still under warranty from a previous repair.
  • Have you updated the camera's firmware? One issue when the SL first came out is that the AF point in the viewfinder didn't always match the patch that the camera was focusing on. This was fixed in an early firmware update. The latest firmware version for the SL is 3.8.
  • Try setting the diopter again. Rest your eyes and set it again. Repeat until you consistently set it to the same value/notch). It's not as easy as it seems. It's nearly impossible if you have strong astigmatism. You might find that you are much more comfortable focusing a rangefinder, or on a screen, than you are with a viewfinder. It's not particularly unusual, but it's something that non-photographers might not be aware of, like colour-blindness.

My other suggestion is to ask a photographer friend if they can reproduce the problem. I don't mean to imply that you are doing something wrong (you aren't), but it's good to get a second opinion.

I agree with everyone else that the camera is probably faulty. The focus plane shifts when the exposure is made, so there must be something loose (or broken) in the shutter/sensor mechanism. Your dealer is reputable, they'll take it back and refund you if that's the case.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried all of the suggestions. I might have to return it. I can't afford an SL2, or I can't justify it anyway.

MPB say in their FAQ that if they can't reproduce the issue they will send the camera back to me. I doubt they will try that hard, so I have been wanting to avoid returning it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice. I have requested a return (within the warranty period). If I'm honest I don't expect anything other than me returning the camera at my expense, MPB sitting on it for a few weeks, then returning it back to me saying they couldn't find anything wrong with it.

I had already decided I wouldn't deal with them again.

Edited by Chris W
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris W,  If MBP can't either take the SL back or simply exchange it, I would write them off as a viable place to buy anything from them.  This would be a simple swap or refund at a Leica Store.  If you want to keep the SL, then simply contact or find a Leica store that will ship the camera back for repair at Wetzlar.  Your SL is clearly out of adjustment for whatever reason.  The only way you are going to get the SL issue resolved is either a swap/return refund or ship to Wetzlar for repair.  The SL is an excellent camera and might be worth the repair cost.  If you decide to send it for a repair, be sure to send a detailed letter describing the problem and include some photos from a couple different lenses to illustrate the issue(s).  Leica will give you an estimate for repairs before proceeding too.  Just accept it and make a decision.  My long-past experience with firms like MBP and others like on eBay, I do not buy from them...period.  I only buy from Leica Stores or reputable Leica dealers that have solid return policies and that included refunds for defective gear.  r/ Mark

Edited by LeicaR10
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are both right.

I am fully hoping to just swap the camera for another 'excellent' SL. And indeed, due to other aspects of this transaction (I haven't gone into) I had already decided not to use MPB again.

I have bought and sold a lot with Wex (with good customer service) and a couple of other more reputable Leica independents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it is not relevant to @Chris W's experience, but for the record, I have bought and sold through MPB quite a few times without problems.

And, even more peripherally, I have bought and sold cameras and lenses on ebay. The only problem I had was a Rolleiflex T I sold that was returned because the lens had fungus (it had, and I hadn't noticed). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck!  I've been an M shooter since the M8.2 was released. Recently bought a used SL to see what it was all about. I love it.  Have since added an SL2.  They don't replace my Ms, but are a wonderful addition.  Hope you can get one that works for you.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LocalHero1953 said:

I know it is not relevant to @Chris W's experience, but for the record, I have bought and sold through MPB quite a few times without problems.

And, even more peripherally, I have bought and sold cameras and lenses on ebay. The only problem I had was a Rolleiflex T I sold that was returned because the lens had fungus (it had, and I hadn't noticed). 

No problems with MPB and eBay either

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, after a bit of back and forth, MPB are just picking up the SL body and giving me a full refund. Which I guess is a good outcome.

Most available SL bodies I see around the reputable outlets are more than I paid MPB.

So, should I buy again and pay more? I'm surprised an original Q is even more expensive (used). I loved mine, but didn't want to be stuck with 28mm.

A Q2 or SL-2 are out of my budget.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chris W said:

OK, after a bit of back and forth, MPB are just picking up the SL body and giving me a full refund. Which I guess is a good outcome.

Most available SL bodies I see around the reputable outlets are more than I paid MPB.

So, should I buy again and pay more? I'm surprised an original Q is even more expensive (used). I loved mine, but didn't want to be stuck with 28mm.

A Q2 or SL-2 are out of my budget.

The SL2-S is a bit less expensive, and also is sold with bundled lens.  If buying used again, stick with reputable Leica dealers; they generally charge more for good reasons.

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...