Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

49 minutes ago, aksclix said:

No one talks about the protruding thumb grip on the 100s.. I guess I am the only one who feels it’s sticking out a bit too much.. it was compared to the S1R but I like the S1R grip  better.. doesn’t mean I don’t like the 100s’ grip though.. it’s the best gfx so far! 
 

This is reduced from the 50S. For me I like it as it gives me stability with larger lenses, but understand it’s not for everyone. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr.Q said:

The 100S is a bit too thick for my hands.  The X1D still has the best ergonomics (by quite a margin) for me.

Still one of the best designed cameras in the last 10 years. Unfortunately lack of IBIS now, gets very hot, less than stellar battery life, max 2000 on the mechanical shutter and slow AF still holds it back performance wise, but in regards to design it’s brilliant. 

Edited by Succisa75
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Succisa75 said:

Still one of the best designed cameras in the last 10 years. Unfortunately lack of IBIS now, gets very hot, less than stellar battery life, max 2000 on the mechanical shutter and slow AF still holds it back performance wise, but in regards to design it’s brilliant. 

Right, the 100s is the better overall camera.

For landscapes though, I think most of those weaknesses are irrelevant. And leaf shutter is still king for strobes.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

GFX 100s has been a revolution.. it would be great to know the conversion rate of this camera.. how many gave up their reliable work horses for this one!! And how many wouldn’t admit and remain in the closet holding onto their outdated cameras 😉

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, setuporg said:

X1Dii and 907x do not get hot in my use.

I don't have issues either. It does get warm but not hot. And it's supposed to. People mention it as a flaw when it's deliberate. The body was designed as a heat sync to disperse heat from the sensor. And it works if the long exposures are anything to go by.

Gordon

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Succisa75 said:

Still one of the best designed cameras in the last 10 years. Unfortunately lack of IBIS now, gets very hot, less than stellar battery life, max 2000 on the mechanical shutter and slow AF still holds it back performance wise, but in regards to design it’s brilliant. 

Almost none of these are relevant to how I shoot the X1D. I think of it as more of a scalpel than swiss army knife. It doesn't pretend to be an all rounder. What it does well it does brilliantly. In some ways it's still class leading by some margin and if you like the things it does well not even the GFX100S betters it. For example, nothing is close when it comes to long exposure implementation. Or the menus.

IBIS is great but the leaf shutters and body design do allow hand holding at pretty ridiculous speeds. Probably a couple of stops better than the GFX with the IBIS turned off. I regularly handhold at 1/F and lower with no issues but I have excellent handholding technique. 30 years of practice and all that......

Gordon

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2021 at 3:18 AM, meerec said:

Totally agree: I use 907X + XCD 45p, without the grip and often without the OVF for street shooting. It is sooooo small, light, and cute. 

I would imagine, though, that shooting in portrait orientation would be extremely awkward, especially without the grip. Or am I missing something? Of course this was not an issue with the old 6x6 film backs.

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, setuporg said:

But I guess you can assume 44x33 is almost a square.:)

Ah, not close for me, compositionally. This would require even more of a crop than 4x5 (8x10), which lends its own important proportions, and even 4x5 is a much different beast than square for me.  But we each see and adapt to viewing/framing systems differently.

Jeff

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jeff S said:

I would imagine, though, that shooting in portrait orientation would be extremely awkward, especially without the grip. Or am I missing something? Of course this was not an issue with the old 6x6 film backs.

Jeff

This is one of the things that has made me pause on a 907. But I suspect I might just set the crop to 1:1 and shoot from the hip. It seems like a camera that would suit shooting square.

Gordon

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

This is one of the things that has made me pause on a 907. But I suspect I might just set the crop to 1:1 and shoot from the hip. It seems like a camera that would suit shooting square.

Gordon

Probably so, but square is not my framing preference or style.  I’d rather dictate than have the camera do so, or have to regularly crop in post.  But I can understand others feeling very comfortable with the approach.  That said, the camera probably would be fun to use, and might yield pics that I wouldn’t normally get due to viewing angle (using flip up screen) and size/discretion. Not a good price/value relationship for me though; too much of a niche. The X1D series viewing and ergonomics have more general appeal for me, with the same sensor.

Jeff 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

Almost none of these are relevant to how I shoot the X1D. I think of it as more of a scalpel than swiss army knife. It doesn't pretend to be an all rounder. What it does well it does brilliantly. In some ways it's still class leading by some margin and if you like the things it does well not even the GFX100S betters it. For example, nothing is close when it comes to long exposure implementation. Or the menus.

IBIS is great but the leaf shutters and body design do allow hand holding at pretty ridiculous speeds. Probably a couple of stops better than the GFX with the IBIS turned off. I regularly handhold at 1/F and lower with no issues but I have excellent handholding technique. 30 years of practice and all that......

Gordon

I do agree on the Menu system. One of the best if not the best of all camera companies but disagree on the leaf shutter and how it equates to shutter shock. The 45P is the best in terms of dampening this in my opinion but other XCD lenses aren’t as good. The X1D would benefit more from IBIS with this vs the GFX system in my personal opinion. I’m decent with handholding at lower shutter speeds but even I experience this shutter shock issue with images that aren’t always tact sharp. 

for colors I prefer the X1D except when shooting red. It has a hard time handling the color. Odd since everything else it handles beautifully 

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, horosu said:

Just a question from a Leica guy considering the X1DII+ 45P:  manual focusing this lens is actually doable? I read a lot about the slow AF and as a Leica M shooter I prefer MF anyway....

I shoot 907X+45p and manual focussing is a wonderful experience. I use manual focus for anything critical with all my XCD lenses. My friend shoots X1D II+45p and manual focus experience is the same. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...