acjeske Posted December 29, 2020 Share #1 Posted December 29, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Just started into this Leica world and this forum is very helpful. My first post... I've started on an M240 and a 40 Cron. I'm returning the M240 because I wanted the ISO dial and higher ISO of the M10, arriving today...After some family holidays photography, I like the results of the combo (M240 and 40 Cron) so far. I'm usually hitting focus, some good resolution, I like the bokeh most of the time. Sometimes, though, I'd like 1.4 over 2. I love the tiny size of the 40. I'm concerned about glow and softness of the 35 1.4 pre-asph. How does its rendering compare to the 40 Cron? Thank you! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 29, 2020 Posted December 29, 2020 Hi acjeske, Take a look here Rendering: 40 Cron vs. 35 Lux pre-asph?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
lct Posted December 30, 2020 Share #2 Posted December 30, 2020 Similar rendering at f/2 and on but very different at f/1.4 . More seriously the 35/1.4 has a bit more glow (halos around highlights) at f/2 but it flares more than the 40/2. Main difference, the 35/1.4 can only focus at 1m vs 0.8m for the 40/2. The latter is smaller and lighter too. Welcome to the forum BTW . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.