miro Posted November 10, 2017 Author Share #441 Posted November 10, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) the silver one will look awesome wearing vintage glass . 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 Hi miro, Take a look here Code Name "Clooney". I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted November 10, 2017 Share #442 Posted November 10, 2017 IBIS in coordination with optical stabilization adds more dimensions to stabilization. Optical stabilization cannot compensate for rotation along the axis of the lens, for example. I Exactly. But there are very few manufacturers offering this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmanda Posted November 10, 2017 Share #443 Posted November 10, 2017 This pancake lens that Leica accidentally showed us, does seem a nice match up for the Clooney too. Would make a small,discreet street shooting package Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 1 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/275404-code-name-clooney/?do=findComment&comment=3393271'>More sharing options...
Guest VVJ Posted November 10, 2017 Share #444 Posted November 10, 2017 (edited) This pancake lens that Leica accidentally showed us, does seem a nice match up for the Clooney too. Would make a small,discreet street shooting package I would like a 28mm like this for the SL as well !!! Edited November 10, 2017 by JorisV 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
miro Posted November 10, 2017 Author Share #445 Posted November 10, 2017 I would like a 28mm like this for the SL as well !!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VVJ Posted November 10, 2017 Share #446 Posted November 10, 2017 I went for the Elmarit-M 28mm... I would prefer a compact AF lens though... Leica made the right call for the TL... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
miro Posted November 10, 2017 Author Share #447 Posted November 10, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Have you shot with TL on the SL ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ropo54 Posted November 10, 2017 Share #448 Posted November 10, 2017 Have you shot with TL on the SL ? yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 10, 2017 Share #449 Posted November 10, 2017 Yes, that would be my preferred outcome. TL2 with AF like the SL. I have the M240 and SL for when I want a bigger camera, but I'd like a fast AF small TL2 for casual use and social stuff. I find I can live without the EVF for such scenarios. I gave mine to Nuk..............she will hopefully get some nice fall pictures in japan in 8 days time :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted November 10, 2017 Share #450 Posted November 10, 2017 Wildlight quote: IBIS plus optical stabilization makes it possible to control rotation (with IBIS) on long lenses, where optical cannot . Exactly. But there are very few manufacturers offering this. Only Panasonic and Olympus? Their IBIS interacts well with both Olympus and Panasonic long zooms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyros Moutsouris Posted November 10, 2017 Share #451 Posted November 10, 2017 What is the LCD screen on the top plate for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted November 11, 2017 Share #452 Posted November 11, 2017 Probably like the SL - shows shutter speed, aperture etc without looking through the EVF 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildlightphoto Posted November 11, 2017 Share #453 Posted November 11, 2017 Exactly. But there are very few manufacturers offering this. Isn't one of Leica's USPs supposed to be superior image quality? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildlightphoto Posted November 11, 2017 Share #454 Posted November 11, 2017 (edited) Wildlight quote: IBIS plus optical stabilization makes it possible to control rotation (with IBIS) on long lenses, where optical cannot . Only Panasonic and Olympus? Their IBIS interacts well with both Olympus and Panasonic long zooms. Pentax too. Among 35mm-format camera makers CaNikon don't but they're not "most" manufacturers. Edited November 11, 2017 by wildlightphoto Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted November 11, 2017 Share #455 Posted November 11, 2017 Yes, but Dual IS is a camera feature that has little to do with image quality as such. It just allows one to get shots that would not be possible otherwise. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted November 11, 2017 Share #456 Posted November 11, 2017 Wildlight quote: IBIS plus optical stabilization makes it possible to control rotation (with IBIS) on long lenses, where optical cannot . Only Panasonic and Olympus? Their IBIS interacts well with both Olympus and Panasonic long zooms. Olympus does not offer dual IS with Panasonic/Leica lenses and vice versa. The M4/3 system is not universal in this respect. Using native long lenses on the respective brands gives similar results. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildlightphoto Posted November 11, 2017 Share #457 Posted November 11, 2017 Yes, but Dual IS is a camera feature that has little to do with image quality as such. It just allows one to get shots that would not be possible otherwise. I find that image quality suffers without IBIS when I use a slow shutter speed. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted November 11, 2017 Share #458 Posted November 11, 2017 Yes, that is true, but that could be called user-induced lack of quality, like in "you should have used a flash" or: "you should have used a tripod" , etc., instead of the camera being unable to produce optimum quality. IS is a user aid. Maybe a meaningless distinction, but still, not the same thing. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildlightphoto Posted November 11, 2017 Share #459 Posted November 11, 2017 (edited) Yes, that is true, but that could be called user-induced lack of quality, like in "you should have used a flash" or: "you should have used a tripod" , etc., instead of the camera being unable to produce optimum quality. IS is a user aid. Maybe a meaningless distinction, but still, not the same thing. Would you like to think about this a little more? Edited November 11, 2017 by wildlightphoto Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted November 11, 2017 Share #460 Posted November 11, 2017 Well, you could say that Leica's strife for optimal image quality is catered for at slow shutter speeds by the provision of a tripod bush. You might consider my post # 455 that IS, IBIS, powerO.I.S. and dual IS are systems that are meant to be able to get [high-quality] shots that were not possible otherwise. Thus an extension of the technique of the photographer, not an enhancement of the image quality provided by the sensor, electronics, lens quality, etc. But as I said also, a moot distinction, not relevant for the end result. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now