Jump to content

No more GAS for me!


IkarusJohn

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

A perfect family!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm selling my 35 Summilux (don't need 2) and I will use the money for a 28 Summilux if it turns out to be as good as it appears to be. It's not a priority.

 

Lens choice and quality isn't a limitation. That selection is good for me. The M3 is really just a bit of history. With the other three, I have film (Tri-X), colour digital and fantastic B&W, each in a form and function that I really like. Couldn't be better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) Black paint :)

 

Apart from lusting after a silver 28 Summilux (and selling my spare 35 Summilux to part fund it), I really have more than enough camera gear - put another way, having experimented with the D800E and A7r, I have all the camera gear I want. New gear coming available (apart from the 28 Summilux :() doesn't really affect how my current equipment works. For years, I shot what I like and want happily with an FM2 and two lenses - a mid range zoom (28-85mm?) and a tele (180mm). Perfect. Used them till they basically gave up the ghost (about 30 years?). With Leica, I have found that the range of 21 to 90 fits perfectly. If I had more, I wouldn't use it.

 

So, while this thread is a bit tongue in cheek (who the f**k needs 4 M cameras, 10 M mount lenses, a Leica T and an SWC? and how much did all that cost?), I really have nothing more than a passing academic interest in what Leica produces in future (my M-A purchase as a replacement for my M9P is surely an example of that). Even the benighted (by some) Leica T is fantastic - it takes very good pictures, and is useful when I'm riding my motorbike, hiking or otherwise in the outdoors wanting something small, AF and zoom, that will take M lenses for macro if I want it. I'm sure a better full frame Sony with mega MP would do way more, but the camera I have works just fine, thank you.

 

And, no. I'm not giving up on my M3, though I tend to use that with my Summitar 50/2 from 1948. It's compact, and somehow rewarding as a combination.

 

Cheers

John

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Otto. The M60 and Monochrom have their own leather straps, so I put the braided ones on the film cameras.

 

Interesting that so much comment compares the M-A to the MP, where I see it more as an M3 with updated viewfinder and film loading system. Hence my fascination that they should be separated by 60 years. Nice, in a disposable world.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...