Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

8 hours ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

Just got back from Venice. For me, the wides were far more useful. Especially the 24-28mm mark. So I’d be taking the 21 and 35, *if* you have to be that minimal. Personally I’d also have the 75mm. My favourite shot from Venice was taken with a 105 equivalent and most of the rest that I like with a 24 or 30mm equiv.

Gordon

Exactly my experience from Venice - 21mm & 35mm got the most use. Less so 75mm.

Edited by MarkP
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

Just got back from Venice. For me, the wides were far more useful. Especially the 24-28mm mark. So I’d be taking the 21 and 35, *if* you have to be that minimal. Personally I’d also have the 75mm. My favourite shot from Venice was taken with a 105 equivalent and most of the rest that I like with a 24 or 30mm equiv.

Gordon

This is really helpful, thank you!

I’m really loving my CV 21 f/3.5 way more than I imagined I would. I think I’ll be taking it along with the 35 FLE and CV 75 f/2.5 Color-Heliar. I’ll leave my 28 and 50 at home. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is my complete travel kit for photography: camera, lens, laptop, flash, a single charging plug for laptop and camera, a single charging/transfer cable. If I don't come home with at least a few good photos, it's not because of the equipment.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well - setting aside a laptop (Windows in my case) and the usual charging gubbins, I've just discovered my perfect travel kit.  

  • M10-R
  • 35-M Summicron Asph
  • Zeiss 90/f4 (coded as Leica Summarit F4 Macro)

I'd only recently obtained the Zeiss before a week's walking in France and the results have been much better than I'd hoped for.  The combination is lightweight and compact (my other trekking combination is SL2 + 24-90!) and a joy to use.  The Zeiss is easy and accurate to focus, and gives me the range I'd miss with a single lens setup.  Given the cost of the Zeiss (mine was £590 + the Heliopan protect filter and lens hood - much better value than the Zeiss) I look forward to many more years of use.

The set up looks like this:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Example images from recent walks in the Jordanne Valley

Summicron M-35 Asph

 

 

Zeiss 90/f4

 

 

 

Edited by chris_tribble
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have enjoyed reading the replies and advice on this thread.  I am relatively new to Leice and am still learning the rangefinder and zone-focusing techniques. 

I am heading to Italy next week.  My Leica kit is simple (because it is all I own now)...M11 w/ Leica 35 mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH FLE v2 along with a Q3. Extra batteries & charger, etc.  

I have no filters (advice welcome).  

Also- considering purchasing my second M-lens....seems like a "50" is most recommended as the next lens...(advice welcome).  

I have Thumb grips on M11 and Q3. Arte di Mano Half case on M11, and a new (but unused) Visoflex. 

Until I recently invested in the Leica system, I planned on taking Fujifilm X100V and XPro3 (or X-T5) with 2 or 3 lenses. This would be a safer kit as I am still learning the M-system (menus, focusing, etc).

Thanks-   

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

when i travel i usually bring 2 M digital, M11 and M10r, besides for backup, my daughter aged 15 would use either one but i trust myself to carry it and a couple of M Films, LM and without, fair share between color and BW films

if i decide to carry my hasselblad 503cw, then one of the film body would stay behind 

for lenses, i will bring multiply like 2 of 50mm either a noctilux 1.2 and an apo summicron, a couple of 35mm too and a 28 summaron

but bear in mind, when i go out shooting i'd usually take only one body and one lens, or a couple at most

and lastly, my macbook air for backing up and processing when i need to 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending what type of "travel" is considered: city, short week-end trip, landscape etc. , my selection is very different:

  1. M11 
    1. 35Lux
    2. Tri-Elmar 28-35-50
    3. 28Cron + Apo50
    4. 21SEM + Apo35 + Apo75
  2. SL2
    1. 50LuxM
    2. Vario 24-90
    3. Vario Super Elmar 16-30 + Apo50

and some cables, batteries, Mac, ...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just packed for my upcoming trip to South Africa. Winelands/ Whale watching and a fortnight wildlife. 
General camera and backup: 

CL, Voigtländer 12 mm Summilux 24 M, 18-56 and 55-135

Wildlife: 

SL, Sigma 150-600 and Vario Elmar 35-70 4.0 R. Olympus EE1 dot sight Trinovid 10x42 Jagd, SF 40  

Cheap walkabout in Cape Town: 

TL and 18 mm TL

MacBook Air 13”

12 kg in the backpack and the CL set 2,5 kg in a bum bag. 
 

The Ms will stay at home, everything is on L mount. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2023 at 7:47 PM, Cmurman said:

I have enjoyed reading the replies and advice on this thread.  I am relatively new to Leice and am still learning the rangefinder and zone-focusing techniques. 

I am heading to Italy next week.  My Leica kit is simple (because it is all I own now)...M11 w/ Leica 35 mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH FLE v2 along with a Q3. Extra batteries & charger, etc.  

I have no filters (advice welcome).  

Also- considering purchasing my second M-lens....seems like a "50" is most recommended as the next lens...(advice welcome).  

I have Thumb grips on M11 and Q3. Arte di Mano Half case on M11, and a new (but unused) Visoflex. 

Until I recently invested in the Leica system, I planned on taking Fujifilm X100V and XPro3 (or X-T5) with 2 or 3 lenses. This would be a safer kit as I am still learning the M-system (menus, focusing, etc).

Thanks-   

Chris

Personally, I'd be matching either a 75mm or 21mm/24mm to a 35mm lens system. I think 50 is too close to 35 for a travel system.

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m traveling to Rome in November. Bringing M11 with 35 FLE2, M11M with Voigtlander 28/2. Trying to decide on the 2 other lenses. Trying to keep everything in small bag. My first thought is 21 SEM and  90/2.4. Other possibilities are Voigtlander 50APO or 50/1 or Loawa 15/2. I’ve been to Rome many times and love wide angle interior images. Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just back from a week long trip to Washington’s Olympic Peninsula. In my Ona Bowery was an M10R, ZM 25mm f/2.8 Biogon, CV 50mm f/1.5 Nokton, CV 90mm f/2.8 APO Skopar, two spare batteries, two additional SD cards and a lens cloth. Between walks in various towns and hikes in Olympic National Park, lens use was about evenly split.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

M11

1 x M11 Battery
1 x Powerbank

Voigtlander Ultron 2/28mm

Summilux-M ASPH 1.4 / 35
Summicron-M 2/35 v4 (compact daylight shooter)

Summilux-M 1.4 / 50

Sekonic 308 cine

Usually everything goes into a generic waist pack that I modified with DIY padded compartments.
It's the low-key 'don't mug me' option.


Thanks to Kodak Tri-X hitting $14 a roll I've pretty much gone digital.

Looking for a second digital body. I'd like another M, but that's a ton of cash. 
Instead I'll probably end up with a DSLR. EVF viewfinder's still have way too much lag for my kind of shooting.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...