Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

4 hours ago, Stevejack said:

Interesting you've got so much wear from those straps, I use the Peak Designs quick release which is pretty hard edged but there's no wear to the paint from it yet. 

Wiping it with a cleaning cloth makes the signs go away.. they are not permanent..

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2022 at 5:55 PM, archiea said:

digital cameras will experience digital rot long before any physical rot kicks in...  heck getting a good patina on a digital leica takes, like, the third owner of the camera! 

indeed a great patina has much value in a collectible

Leica builds cameras for use

most of the complaints I've seen here of the silver model would seem to resolve with dilute soap & a soft cloth, even more so with the black model

looking forward to getting one after the holidays, but given my advanced age, the black appeals to me more

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

On a trip to Hawaii, carrying camera in a separate part of Nomatic backpack.

It seems the back which closes the bag was rubbing against the top of the camera. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by mirekti
Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, mirekti said:

On a trip to Hawaii, carrying camera in a separate part of Nomatic backpack.

It seems the back which closes the bag was rubbing against the top of the camera. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

is that metal showing or just the abraded material from your bag?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hmzimelka said:

is that metal showing or just the abraded material from your bag?

Definitely scratched. Not as bad as in the photo, though. Now when I know where it is I notice it easy. It also depends from which angle it is looked at.
I'll blame it on the backpack which has pockets with mash material from the inside. I should have put something on the top.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mirekti said:

Definitely scratched. Not as bad as in the photo, though. Now when I know where it is I notice it easy. It also depends from which angle it is looked at.
I'll blame it on the backpack which has pockets with mash material from the inside. I should have put something on the top.   

Wow. OK. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On a related matter:

 

Is there any notable difference in toughness between the brass top plate and the aluminium version?

I had an original Q and it fell - whilst in a padded bag - off a sofa and onto the carpeted floor of a hotel. The alumium dented and began rubbing on the small control wheel on the rear right. It required a trip back to Germany and a new top plate.

I am sure an M is generally tougher than that but wondered whether there is a difference between brass and aluminium. I can find general information but not what type of alumium series Leica is using so I cannot work it out.

 

Re brassing - they should try anodising the alumium gold before the black coating gets applied!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kiwimac said:

On a related matter:

 

Is there any notable difference in toughness between the brass top plate and the aluminium version?

I had an original Q and it fell - whilst in a padded bag - off a sofa and onto the carpeted floor of a hotel. The alumium dented and began rubbing on the small control wheel on the rear right. It required a trip back to Germany and a new top plate.

I am sure an M is generally tougher than that but wondered whether there is a difference between brass and aluminium. I can find general information but not what type of alumium series Leica is using so I cannot work it out.

 

Re brassing - they should try anodising the alumium gold before the black coating gets applied!

No amount of strength can replicate the natural brassing imho

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2022 at 7:30 PM, mirekti said:

On a trip to Hawaii, carrying camera in a separate part of Nomatic backpack.

It seems the back which closes the bag was rubbing against the top of the camera. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Looks like your camera is ruined. You can send it to me and I'll deal. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Kiwimac said:

No it can’t. However I’m curious as to whether the material itself offers benefits other than weight saving or downsides other than no brassing. 

Im sure i didnt like when my SL or Q’es having paint chipped, however the m11 has got new way of coatings whose durability isnt like before? Not easily brassed or chipped

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm aware that many appreciate the brassed M bodies. However, I prefer durability, and my cameras in general still look, though frequently used, quite good, some even mint, after years. So far I haven't had a M, but 3 Leicas from the X series, still holding an XV. Touching up dents or smaller scratches with black matte Revell paint matched perfectly, no noticeable difference from the original colour. I am wondering, if that would work also with a black M11 or M10-R, as my impression is that those bodies aren't of the same deep black matte finish?

Now, after having sold almost all the rest of my Canon gear, I'm asking myself, which direction to go for with Leica (Qx or M). Personally, I'd feel somehow ripped off paying such an amount of money for a M and then experiencing wear and tear just from carrying, holding and operating it, and I am not talking about an accidental damage. Chrome finish, either black or silver, or any paint, technically can made to last forever... question is just what Leica's decisions were (deliberately chosing a softer coating?). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Phil75 said:

Now, after having sold almost all the rest of my Canon gear, I'm asking myself, which direction to go for with Leica (Qx or M). Personally, I'd feel somehow ripped off paying such an amount of money for a M and then experiencing wear and tear just from carrying, holding and operating it, and I am not talking about an accidental damage. Chrome finish, either black or silver, or any paint, technically can made to last forever... question is just what Leica's decisions were (deliberately chosing a softer coating?). 

Why do you think it’s a softer coat? I’ve been using the camera mostly every day for the last year, and there is nothing to see as a scratch or dent.

PS the new paint has been developed for the reporter, camera for toughness, and to find a new way more environmentally friendly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 10 Stunden schrieb Phil75:

I'm aware that many appreciate the brassed M bodies. However, I prefer durability, and my cameras in general still look, though frequently used, quite good, some even mint, after years. So far I haven't had a M, but 3 Leicas from the X series, still holding an XV. Touching up dents or smaller scratches with black matte Revell paint matched perfectly, no noticeable difference from the original colour. I am wondering, if that would work also with a black M11 or M10-R, as my impression is that those bodies aren't of the same deep black matte finish?

Now, after having sold almost all the rest of my Canon gear, I'm asking myself, which direction to go for with Leica (Qx or M). Personally, I'd feel somehow ripped off paying such an amount of money for a M and then experiencing wear and tear just from carrying, holding and operating it, and I am not talking about an accidental damage. Chrome finish, either black or silver, or any paint, technically can made to last forever... question is just what Leica's decisions were (deliberately chosing a softer coating?). 

But who ever said the finish of the M11 is softer and less durable than the other M bodies before? I had an M10P before, which had a less durable coating and I could not recognize much wear after 2 years! I do believe the M11 finish will be even more robust than anything before. After half a year of using it, no sign of use! 

Even though a Leica M is quite expensive, it does not mean it will be invulnerable! Some of us prefer to let it show how it got used, some don't. If you take care of it, I do believe it will be looking like new for quite some time ;) 

I would not recommend to get one if a small scratch would cause a mental breakdown!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Am 26.7.2022 um 18:52 schrieb jonoslack:

My German documents for my M11 all said 'Black Paint'

Really? What were the German words they used? Schwarzlack? It is somewhat confusing indeed, as traditionally Leica 'Black Paint' models had that shiny black laquer finish, whereas while the M11 certainly shines, it has a matte black finish 🙂. I wonder how they will call a successor to the M10R black paint, if it eventually comes to market.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember when the MP was introduced in 2003 and the internet went into a frenzy because it was covered in 'lackieren' which was taken to be Japanese decorative lacquer instead of a German word for paint. But we should be used to the modern finishes Leica use by now, the M9 was I think the first black paint model using a powder coating technique, not enamel or acrylic sprayed on wet, and definitely not a shellac made from the excretions of bees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...