Jump to content

Leica Q2 Mono - M Mono - Monochrom (Typ 246)


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

If you own a Leica M Monochron and its successor and you're toying with the Q2M because it has autofocus and stabilizer, is that justified? It's all about image quality and the monochrome conversion (CCD - CMOS).

Does anyone have experience and can give it here briefly and succinctly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I owned the Leica M Monochrom and now have the M10 Monochrom and M10P.  I also have the Canon R5 and Sony A7R4 as my non-RF systems.  Image stabilization comes into play - for me - when I am using slower shutter speeds or long lenses for action or wildlife pictures.  Otherwise, the M series works just fine.  As for AF, that increases my hit ratio quite a bit when I am under pressure to get the shot or working in tough situations.  Especially because my eye sight is not what it use to be.  For me - the eye detection technology (for humans and animals) is a game changer.  Tracking and eye detection on modern mirrorless or DSLR systems are fantastic.  I believe camera systems are like tools and each has its place depending on your particular need or anticipated use.  You should test drive the Leica AF systems for a day to get an idea of what you may be gaining or missing.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...