Jump to content

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, albireo_double said:

I even got in touch with them through Leica support to find out what radio triggers they were using with the Rotolights

I remember this video. Was very intrigued by the use of triggers. Have you received any information on the triggers used and the sync?

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 39 Minuten schrieb nicci78:

Sorry to disappoint. SL2 is not ready for prime time. Have to wait til the end of year. Before winter for sure. 
 

At least it’s good to know, that Leica will consider the feedback the KOLs provided and work to improve the camera. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nicci78 said:

Sorry to disappoint. SL2 is not ready for prime time. Have to wait til the end of year. Before winter for sure. 
 

That is a pity. I was hoping orders could be placed in the US before the tariffs go into place on Oct 18th - https://leicarumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/25-US-tax-for-European-products-include-also-Leica-cameras-and-lenses.pdf 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, ynp said:

I remember this video. Was very intrigued by the use of triggers. Have you received any information on the triggers used and the sync?

thanks 

Well, they said they used the Canon version of the Elinchrom EL-Skyport triggers. Which made no sense initially because the pin arrangement in the hotshoe is different between Canon and Leica. I did not have a Canon version Skyport, but had a Nikon version. In the end, I figured out for myself that I had to disable all other pins but the central one to make it work. To do so, I inserted a simple one pin "cube" into the SL's hotshoe and then inserted the trigger into the "cube". What I mean by "cube" is the flash adapter that goes in the hotshoe and has another hotshoe on the top, with just the central pin, and a standard PC sync socket on the side (like this one Rotolight Version). When I used it, I think I selected the 1/50s sync speed on the Rotolight (max output) and whatever shutter speed I needed to get to the ambient correct. The Rotolights are quite nice but there is not that much power in them; the built-in flash capability alleviates this lack of power to a degree.

Edited by albireo_double
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, albireo_double said:

Well, they said they used the Canon version of the Elinchrom EL-Skyport triggers. Which made no sense initially because the pin arrangement in the hotshoe is different between Canon and Leica.

Thank you very much for your information. So there’s no secret Elinchtom  Leica adapter...

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ynp said:

So there’s no secret Elinchtom  Leica adapter...

Nope. And no dedicated Profoto, Broncolor trigger either. Just the generic ones with no HSS or TTL. Never mind. Leica shooters shoot with available light. Or with Canon triggers hacked with a bit of sellotape. End of rant.

Edited by albireo_double
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, albireo_double said:

Nope. And no dedicated Profoto, Broncolor trigger either. Just the generic ones with no HSS or TTL. Never mind. Leica shooters shoot with available light. Or with Canon triggers hacked with a bit of sellotape. End of rant.

If you have a donkey an an assistant for set up and manage these strobes & light modifiers, you can always use a TTL flash mounted to yr SL’s hot shoe set the camera to higher than sync shutter speed to trigger a optical trigger connected to strobes set to full power at off camera positions to offer you HSS to overpower the sun. Technically speaking HSS off camera flash offers flexibility & creativity. But on most outdoor situations you need like a 200W minimum to provide fill effect at close distance on your subject. 

If you do not have a donkey an an assistant like me, use multiple of the Nissin MG10 (165ws) flash that can be fired HSS/TTL with Leica SF-C1 commander. Certainly the SF60s could be used but the insufficient power and overheating will very soon shutdown those units making them redundant.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no spec release of the SL2 along with the leaked photos of the camera exterior except:

1. 47 MPx;

2. Cine mode;

3. 4 K video.

The codename is Vader, suggesting good Low light capability. So I derive that there got to be some form of IBIS and an improved ISO / dynamic range over the current S1R to enhance the otherwise let down by the 47MPx of the S1R sensor.

Nothing mentioned about the AF capacity, I just hope that it will be at least on par with the S1R AF capability for the worst.

Another 31days wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sillbeers15 said:

There is no spec release of the SL2 along with the leaked photos of the camera exterior except:

1. 47 MPx;

2. Cine mode;

3. 4 K video.

The codename is Vader, suggesting good Low light capability. So I derive that there got to be some form of IBIS and an improved ISO / dynamic range over the current S1R to enhance the otherwise let down by the 47MPx of the S1R sensor.

Nothing mentioned about the AF capacity, I just hope that it will be at least on par with the S1R AF capability for the worst.

Another 31days wait.

So essentially S1R? Likely with sensor(cover) with improved M-lens handling. And possibly improved high ISO. Without a new Maestro processor (based on the fact that S3 will use the Maestro S007 prosessor), the max fps will (most likely) decrease from 11 to 6-ish fps. And Leica colour, although S1R is close to SL in that respect. It is too much to hope for improved AF compared to S1R, I guess. I am still interested, but hard to see how SL2 will substantively differentiate from S1R. But surprises are - of course - welcome!

Edited by helged
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, helged said:

So essentially S1R? Likely with sensor(cover) with improved M-lens handling. And possibly improved high ISO. Without a new Maestro processor (based on the fact that S3 will use the Maestro S007 prosessor), the max fps will (most likely) decrease from 11 to 6-ish fps. And Leica colour, although S1R is close to SL in that respect. It is too much to hope for improved AF compared to S1R, I guess. I am still interested, but hard to see how SL2 will substantively differentiate from S1R. But surprises are - of course - welcome!

It is my hope that it be a different sensor than the S1R, but I’m not certain. It got to be better in DR than S1R for sure.

If it is based on S1R sensor, than AF will likely be same as S1R based on same architecture. If it were a different sensor, than a PDAF & CDAF hybrid AF can be possible. 

A lot also depends on the processor power as I suspect the lack of AF tracking reliability actually depends more on processing power (or speed of calculation) than the type of AF. The Sony A9II promotion spec states that the AF tracking calculates 60 times per second.

Although the SL offers 11 frames per Sec shooting speed. It essentially takes mostly rubbish as far as AF tracking on AFC mode ending up with mostly out of focus pics. Folks quickly jump into conclusion that the SL was useless for AF tracking moving subject. My own experience tells that dropping from Continuous high mode to Continuous medium mode improved AF tracking reliability so much more. Therefore it is the calculation speed that matters more and six frames per sec with reliable AF tracking means much more that faster but rubbish.

Anyway in 31 days we will know for certain ‘what is what’ ending all the fun on speculation.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...