Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

T with T11-23, T 55-135 and EVF , M to T adaptor .

M10 with 3-4 m lens, 28, 35 , 50 , 90

 

Why?

1. Common EVF with M10

2. Gives me wider angle which I don't have for M lens on M10

3. AF When need to

4. zoom if need to

5.1.5 X APSC for my m lens on the T .

6. Light and small size_

 

Did well on this combo for my last trip to Italy . Will do the same for my next trip to Peru.... leaving late this month...

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gordon has many more cameras and one more pool table than do I.   :D

I have M10; SL for longer and for trickier lighting situations, with M lenses.  Q for fun, great walking around camera.   Sony RX100iii for the times when I need a pocket camera.   Cheap Fuji of some sort (don't remember the model) for underwater and beach.  When traveling I am likely to take SL and M and some M lenses.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gordon has many more cameras and one more pool table than do I. :D

I have M10; SL for longer and for trickier lighting situations, with M lenses. Q for fun, great walking around camera. Sony RX100iii for the times when I need a pocket camera. Cheap Fuji of some sort (don't remember the model) for underwater and beach. When traveling I am likely to take SL and M and some M lenses.

You have a Q, an SL, and an M. I've never shot with the Q or SL so pardon my ignorant but curious question: when traveling my thought would be to take the Q and the M. Why do you choose the SL over the Q when traveling?

 

My question arises because my second camera will either be the Q or the SL. I'm no pro so I'm thinking Q. But your response has me curious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a Q, an SL, and an M. I've never shot with the Q or SL so pardon my ignorant but curious question: when traveling my thought would be to take the Q and the M. Why do you choose the SL over the Q when traveling?

 

My question arises because my second camera will either be the Q or the SL. I'm no pro so I'm thinking Q. But your response has me curious.

I'm not a pro either.  The Q is 28mm only.  I can travel with a 90 MacroElmar or a APO Telyt 135 and put them on the SL.  I can also use the 16-18-21 WATE for interiors of churches, etc.  There are also times I want 50mm but expect difficult lighting and the EVF makes that easier.  Could I use the clip-on EVF for the M10? Yes, certainly, but I prefer the SL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

I own too many cameras. Many more than I care to list....

 

How about a photo?

 

35685807290_2cc19c398e_b.jpgDSC09000.jpg by Gordon Cahill, on Flickr

 

Gordon

Where's the TL2??

Digitally; Eventually I will have a M10 to go with my S007 and nothing else...............hopefully the perfect combination.

Film wise Chamonix 8x10 and 4x5

 

And nothing else

 

Neil

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the M10 and have it with me whenever I travel or on assignment, etc.  It is my "personal" project camera.

 

For my work, I use mostly Nikon gear.  Just received a NIkon D850 yesterday.  My other work cameras are Nikon D810's and a Nikon D5.

Edited by tbonanno
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

I love the M10 and have it with me whenever I travel or on assignment, etc.  It is my "personal" project camera.

 

For my pro work, I use mostly Nikon gear.  Just received a NIkon D850 yesterday.  My other work cameras are Nikon D810's and a Nikon D5.

My work camera is my iPhone 6............ my fun camera is a Leica Soo7

 

Neil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...