Jump to content

The Leica User Forum Book


bill

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bill,

 

Thanks for clarifying the position on model releases but at the risk of incurring your wrath so as to save you some potential grief later :o are you certain that in the unlikely case of a writ being issued the defendant would be the photographer and not the editor who is responsible for actually publishing the offending photo? If you're not certain then leaving the responsibility for the model release up to the photographer (although in itself a perfectly reasonable thing to do) may not protect you from prosecution.

 

I really want this project to go ahead but the relevant parties need to be suitably protected.:cool:

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill,

 

Thanks for the clarification, all seems fair and sensible to me.

 

Re Pete's comment above, I think we need to remember that before you get to any sort of legal situation, the subject would need to see the photo/book and take exception to it (as opposed to perhaps being flattered?! - depending on the image of course).

 

They would then need to seek legal advice to clarify their position, instigate legal action at considerable cost to themselves and for what ends?

 

Bill is wise to satisfy himself with the legal position of course, but also consider what is likely in reality - whilst this sounds like an excellent project I doubt if it will sell many copies beyond the participants and other forum members.

 

After all, posting an image on this forum is just the same as publishing it in a book. There are different rules if you were to use the image of a person for commercial (advertising) purposes of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to have had to have been (any syntaxists care to name the tenses?:D) the 'bucket of cold water' but with the change in the law that allowed the ambulance-chasing legal vultures to pick over the carcasses of minor infractions of the law in the UK, the complexion of the legal landscape has changed for the worse permanently.

 

In explanation: I would far rather suffer the ignominy of being accused of being alarmist and for my concern to be groundless than to have said nothing and for anyone associated with the book to find themselves unwittingly targetted by these aggressively litigative piranhas. :o

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to have had to have been (any syntaxists care to name the tenses?:D) the 'bucket of cold water' but with the change in the law that allowed the ambulance-chasing legal vultures to pick over the carcasses of minor infractions of the law in the UK, the complexion of the legal landscape has changed for the worse permanently.

 

In explanation: I would far rather suffer the ignominy of being accused of being alarmist and for my concern to be groundless than to have said nothing and for anyone associated with the book to find themselves unwittingly targetted by these aggressively litigative piranhas. :o

 

Pete.

 

What he said. :)

 

Bill, how about people post their photos? Do you want to do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill,

 

very good idea (good as many other before, Leica day last year, the one challange etc...). So, I am looking forward and I would be glad to contribute some help in case it is needed and the pictures of course.

 

Best regards,

Andreas

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...