Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thank you, Jono, as always, for your clear, practical review - and great images!

I have occasionally missed the wider view of the Q2 since switching to the Q3-43 (I'd have preferred a Q3-35); guessing that a Q3-M was on its way, I have fantasised about a wide Q3-M to go alongside the Q3-43 in the same bag.

I'll keep fantasising for the moment!

Looking forward to the v4 firmware though - I like the SL3-S menu screens customisable by profile, and it will be good to have the same on the Q.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor einer Stunde schrieb jonoslack:

Optional Grip enabling WiFi charging

Nice idea, but given the amount of energy that WiFi provides, it would probably take years for the battery to fully charge.

This is more likely to be the charging method according to the Qi standard.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LocalHero1953 said:

Thank you, Jono, as always, for your clear, practical review - and great images!

I have occasionally missed the wider view of the Q2 since switching to the Q3-43 (I'd have preferred a Q3-35); guessing that a Q3-M was on its way, I have fantasised about a wide Q3-M to go alongside the Q3-43 in the same bag.

I'll keep fantasising for the moment!

Looking forward to the v4 firmware though - I like the SL3-S menu screens customisable by profile, and it will be good to have the same on the Q.

You are not the only one ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jono. How is eye detect in continuous AF. Obviously will be nothing like my Sony A1ii but did you find it usable. Does it track the eyes at all if the subject is moving something which my Q2M can't

Edited by viramati
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the original Q, an excellent camera, at the time it was a bold camera for Leica to offer, for me it was a "B" camera workhorse, liked it a lot and only sold it when Leica came out with the Q2-M which I bought and still have seeing no reason for any upgrade...And seeing too that I never use anything beyond 50mm with my M's I have been more than happy with the 28mm FL, plus I know that I personally would find the Q3-43 has too long a FL for me to be stuck with.

The Q2-M's resolution has proven to be more than enough for me, easily printing to A1 even with a lot of cropping now and again, ( I love cropping! ). Dead chuffed with that camera.

But Kudos again to Leica for bringing out another Monochrom, I have the M11-M and second to my analogue cameras, ( and TriX / Rodinal ! ) that Monochrom produces images that really please me even though to get what I want I keep at 18mp and probably degrade the image somewhat too to get what I like out of the files, presumably the similar flexibility of the files that would also be the same for the Q3- Monochrom too.

Leica has really got the Q's right from the get go, nice one Leica.

Edited by Smudgerer
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, viramati said:

Hi Jono. How is eye detect in continuous AF. Obviously will be nothing like my Sony A1ii but did you find it usable. Does it track the eyes at all if the subject is moving something which my Q2M can't

Hi there

i don’t often use AFC and I only tried it with animal detect (which seemed pretty good). 
I’ll try and remember to check it out (send me a pm if I forget!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jonoslack said:

Hi there

even wider than 28mm?

I meant: I won't buy but will keep fantasising, as a substitute (story of my life)!

Wider? 24mm would be nice - then I could treat the two Q3s as an alternative to the SL3-S + 24-90 :)

Edited by LocalHero1953
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LocalHero1953 said:

I meant: I won't buy but will keep fantasising, as a substitute (story of my life)!

Wider? 24mm would be nice - then I could treat the two Q3s as an alternative to the SL3-S + 24-90 :)

I would really have liked to see three focal lengths, 21mm, 35mm and something longer. I don’t specify how much longer as I would be happy with 21mm and 35mm.
The 43mm is of no interest to me and never will be. It seems a bizarre choice of focal length, one that has no history with Leica.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TonyPolson said:

I would really have liked to see three focal lengths, 21mm, 35mm and something longer. I don’t specify how much longer as I would be happy with 21mm and 35mm.
The 43mm is of no interest to me and never will be. It seems a bizarre choice of focal length, one that has no history with Leica.

no history other than the fact that the very first Leica M lens was.....43.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, S Maclean said:

no history other than the fact that the very first Leica M lens was.....43.

No, for my usage 28mm is the way to go, way more flexible than the Q3-43, but Leica are keeping that 28mm FL with the new Q3-M, so all to love as far as I am concerned.

Another reason though not to upgrade for me is the flip screen, don't like them........A dream Q would be an all black as coal  Q3-D Monochrom with the 28mm 'Lux, now yer talking..........

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jono mentions firmware update 4.0, but did not list the changes, as the firmware has not been released yet. If you are as impatient as I am 🤣, you can download Q3M instructions and see the changes.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...