Jump to content

Leica M11-P: New Flagship With Content Authentication

LUF Admin

By LUF Admin
in Leica M11

 Share

Recommended Posts

thrid

thrid

Posted
Posted (edited)

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 hours ago, Smudgerer said:

Is it just me or is there a "ho-hum" about this release of  the M11-P? Much ado about pretty much nothing?

I did not expect to see any big changes until the M12 arrives, which I suspect will dump the mechanical shutter and replace it with a jello free global electronic shutter. There may  be a simple 'dumb' shutter that caps the sensor when changing lenses etc.

In addition to the traditional optical rangefinder model, I suspect that there is a good chance that we may also see a EVF version being offered along side. If Leica goes big you may even see a hybrid optical / EVF finder like on the Fuji X-Pro.

Personally I have no interest in an EVF model, since the view is too sluggish for my kind of shooting. I've tried everything from a Z9 to the SL and Q series and they all have too much lag. For me it's optical all the way, which is why I plan on buying a DSLR, while you can still get them.

Edited by thrid
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

dkmoore
dkmoore

This entire thread should be deleted. Typical board rich men bickering over copyright protection that will never apply because most of our photos aren’t good enough to matter. 

wolan
wolan

That’s it? I hoped to see more in this release: integrated EVF, Bild stabilization, articulated screen….    

rramesh
rramesh

Soon content authentication will be integrated with AI.  - Horrible shot. Auto deleted.   - Irredeemable in post. Auto deleted. - Morality violation. Auto reported to authorities and spouse. 

Posted Images

steveBK

steveBK

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Stef63 said:

Additionally, most of the volume of an AirTag is taken up by its casing and battery. This wouldn't be necessary, as only the electronics need to be integrated into the M.

For the adventurous, I bet you could tear it apart and put the board & battery next to each other, increasing the footprint but reducing the thickness

https://www.ifixit.com/News/50145/airtag-teardown-part-one-yeah-this-tracks

You could then more easily fit into a camera case / inside the fabric linings / etc 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Kwesi

Kwesi

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, FrozenInTime said:

This story illustrates that no amount of authentication associated with the captured image file and processing chain will in itself ensure journalistic integrity.

 

True, but the chip is not designed to do that. Its designed to prove the authenticity/integrity of the image file  (not the photographer) at time of capture.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Kwesi

Kwesi

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, setuporg said:

I must say that of dozens of ideas for improvement, CAI was never even mentioned here since M11 had launched.  And we wish Leica listens to the users here...

I have to say kudos to Leica for adding a feature that's creating some buzz! Even if for the vast majority of us M users its pretty damn low on the M11-P wishlist

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
jaapv

jaapv

Posted
Posted

Still, I can imagine situations where being able to authenticate an image back to its origin can be of great value, if only legally. I mean, being able to prove beyond doubt that the cat that you photographed was the neighbour's sitting on your fence can earn you a large amount of money in litigation.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Eoin

Eoin

Posted
Posted

Advertisement (gone after registration)

My photography has been a life long hobby, all personal, non commercial. 

So from that perspective, the M11-P is a disappointment in terms of "useful upgrades". I had been reluctant to invest in a higher resolution M11 to complement my M10, because of all the issues and dread of long delays in Leica CS should anything go wrong. 

It'll be interesting to see if the M11-P is prone to freezing, I'm still keen on getting a higher res M and don't fancy another 5 year wait. I still enjoy the M10, it has been flawless and a joy to use.

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
setuporg

setuporg

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Eoin said:

It'll be interesting to see if the M11-P is prone to freezing, I'm still keen on getting a higher res M and don't fancy another 5 year wait. I still enjoy the M10, it has been flawless and a joy to use.

M10-R was my go-to M since its release and is enough for most things.  And I found myself bringing my Edition 60 more and more along.  But I'm finally curious about the M11 with the M11-P -- the hope here is that it's thoroughly tested given what's transpired.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Edax

Edax

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, jaapv said:

Still, I can imagine situations where being able to authenticate an image back to its origin can be of great value, if only legally. I mean, being able to prove beyond doubt that the cat that you photographed was the neighbour's sitting on your fence can earn you a large amount of money in litigation.

Especially when the cat is as big as the one on your avatar 😀

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
marchyman

marchyman

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, AndreasG said:

Who can explain me why the camera has different order Nos. country by country resp. region by region? It can't be the AC charger or its plug.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Guess: WiFi frequencies.   The range of supported channels varies by region. At 2.4 GHz most of the world supports channels 1-13.   In the US Channel 12 and 13 are avoided.  In Japan channel 14 is allowed for some use.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
mujk

mujk

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, marchyman said:

Guess: WiFi frequencies.   The range of supported channels varies by region. At 2.4 GHz most of the world supports channels 1-13.   In the US Channel 12 and 13 are avoided.  In Japan channel 14 is allowed for some use.

Another alternative could be export or import restrictions on the cryptographic algorithms and/or crypto key lengths or the crypto chip itself used in implementing CAI. Just guessing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
jdlaing

jdlaing

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Antonio Russell said:

"It can be difficult for photographers to prove authorship of their own photographs"

Source: https://leica-camera.com/en-int/news/partnership-greater-trust-digital-photography-leica-and-content-authenticity-initiative

I think you’re interpreting it wrong. It’s meant to prove the photo is original as taken and nothing has been added or removed from a photo.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
Antonio Russell

Antonio Russell

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, jdlaing said:

I think you’re interpreting it wrong. It’s meant to prove the photo is original as taken and nothing has been added or removed from a photo.

Yea right. Tell that to Leica mate. The only authorship proven is that of the camera, not the person having taken it. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
thrid

thrid

Posted
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, Antonio Russell said:

Yea right. Tell that to Leica mate. The only authorship proven is that of the camera, not the person having taken it. 


It is not about tracking the shooting location or tagging a person as the photographer.

It's about creating a chain of verification to ensure that the original DNG has not been modified.

That's it.

Think of it as a tamper seal.

 

Edited by thrid
Link to post
Share on other sites
rramesh

rramesh

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Antonio Russell said:

Yea right. Tell that to Leica mate. The only authorship proven is that of the camera, not the person having taken it. 

"I tell you that's my camera that took this photo! It was stolen 6 months ago!"

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
setuporg

setuporg

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, mujk said:

Another alternative could be export or import restrictions on the cryptographic algorithms and/or crypto key lengths or the crypto chip itself used in implementing CAI. Just guessing.

Cryptography export regulations had failed and were generally abandoned, which is an argument that the Linux Foundation is now making to the EU to drop its misguided attempts to regulate AI in a similar fashion.  Hope it's not that.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...