Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm still wondering if, like the original M6 Classic, the new M6 accepts IXMOO cassettes.  No one seems to know yet.  But I bet that, just like its M7, MP and M-A older brethren, it does not....

Edited by M9reno
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Al Brown said:

Direction yes, but what about arrow sync, that's the topic... ( I do not own the MP, just quoting the guy).

Similar conversation going on in another thread.  I posted info from the new M6 manual (downloadable from the Leica web site) here:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, M9reno said:

I'm still wondering if, like the original M6 Classic, the new M6 accepts IXMOO cassettes.  No one seems to know yet.  But I bet that, just like its M7, MP and M-A older brethren, it does not....

No. The early M6s baseplate was still manufactured with the key to open the IXMOO but eventually it was dropped. There are changes to the MP body shell and the older baseplates are not interchangeable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Homer Dulu said:

I have an early model Wetzlar M6. It’s always bugged me that it’s a zinc top, prone to bubbling. Always preferred the brassing on black paint Leicas. If mine starts bubbling, I wonder if I can swap out the top plates? 

If it hasn't bubbled by now it never will. Bubbling is rare in spite of what you may read on this forum and is a result of poor casting or plating in the initial process. When it does occur it shows up fairly soon. However it can occur if the top plate plating is badly damaged which could allow moisture to attack the zinc so usual care is recommended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Well, with all the internet buzz that the M6 has been receiving over the last couple of years, it would not have been a good marketing decision to have anything BUT "Leica M6" on the front of the camera.  Otherwise, all the new M6 Wanna-be owners would purchase used M6's so they have a "real M6."  This way Leica can sell them a "Real M6," instead of someone else (and Ebay) sharing the profit. ;)

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mikep996 said:

Well, with all the internet buzz that the M6 has been receiving over the last couple of years, it would not have been a good marketing decision to have anything BUT "Leica M6" on the front of the camera.  Otherwise, all the new M6 Wanna-be owners would purchase used M6's so they have a "real M6."  This way Leica can sell them a "Real M6," instead of someone else (and Ebay) sharing the profit. ;)

 

 

 

I still wonder how many M6 wannabe owners are going to pay $5295 for a new 'real' M6 or half that on a used 'real' M6.  I guess time will tell. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pyrogallol said:

You would have thought they would have given it a new name,  M6-2, like they did with the M4-2.

That’s what we in the forum mostly do:

- Summicron 35 iv , or pre-asph, or king of bokeh or v4

- Leica M9M, or Monochrom1, Monochrome1

- etc.

Voigtlander does this quite systematically by adding ii, see the Ultrons 28 and 35. So an M6 ii would do I think

Edited by otto.f
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, logan2z said:

I still wonder how many M6 wannabe owners are going to pay $5295 for a new 'real' M6 or half that on a used 'real' M6.  I guess time will tell. 

All those who can afford to.   One is 40 years old, one is  brand new and improved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Making M6 once again makes sense. It is the statement of what Leica’s canon is.  

A line from M3, M2, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6, MP and M6 once again. 

Sorry folks, M5, M6 TTL and M7 were attempts to break from canon. They failed and they are left out of analog M history. 

Leica definitive M line up in 2022 is one year old M11 and 38 years old M6. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, nicci78 said:

Making M6 once again makes sense. It is the statement of what Leica’s canon is.  

A line from M3, M2, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6, MP and M6 once again. 

Sorry folks, M5, M6 TTL and M7 were attempts to break from canon. They failed and they are left out of analog M history. 

Leica definitive M line up in 2022 is one year old M11 and 38 years old M6. 
 

What a load of nonsense.

Leica’s return to its historical base is the Mp & M-A.  For my money, the “new” M6 is just pastiche.  Having aperture priority as an additional mode is a trick Leica has missed, in my view.  Adding that to the MP would have rounded out the film M cameras nicely.  I see the M11 as another potential conceptual blind alley, like the M(240).  

But then we all differ, and that’s a good thing.  I’ll watch the M11 variants, and the M12, with remote interest.  I’ll flog my SL, TL2, Monochrom and M10-D til they die, then I’ll probably just stick to film.  I don’t see the digital M heading in a direction which is either consistent with the traditional M paradigm, and it is not an itch I wish to scratch.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, nicci78 said:

Making M6 once again makes sense. It is the statement of what Leica’s canon is.  

A line from M3, M2, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6, MP and M6 once again. 

Sorry folks, M5, M6 TTL and M7 were attempts to break from canon. They failed and they are left out of analog M history. 

Leica definitive M line up in 2022 is one year old M11 and 38 years old M6. 
 

You do know that the fact you are mentioning the M5, M6ttl and M7 means they are part of Leica analog history, right?

And how can the definitive line up include a 38 year old camera when Leica has just released a much improved version of it?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...