Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Vincent

I am fully aware of the Leica quality. I am a big fan. I have multiple M lenses, incl. the Noctilux, 50 APO M, Summiluxes and the SL2 and multiple lenses, incl. the APO SLs. It is just a fact though, that the S system is a LOT less wide spread amongst professional studios than Phase One and Hasselblad. Not gonna recite all the reasons for this. What I was told what was said was is that the S camera is mostly bought by well off enthusiasts and people already owning an SL or M.

And it is also the reality that most of those "enthusiasts" shoot mundane subjects with their expensive S camera because it is just not their job to setup shoots, pay for models, location scouts, stylists, etc. And most of them have an intensive job, so time is scarce! So what you end up is dog, flower, and kid pics with an odd landscape here and there. Nothing wrong with that!

Photography has been commoditised and is a wide spread hobby and the money for the companies nowadays lies with the enthusiast segment, all I am saying!

Thanks

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Honestly, I could not care less what anyone else does with it, or who else shoots with it. I am looking forward to getting one at some point and putting it to work. Professionally. Nor do I care about any videos or presentations about it. Often "pro" geared publications and ad campaigns are ridiculous and generally filled with boring and often misogynist and/or racially problematic glossy imagery. If this is "pro", it is intensely boring.

Edited by Stuart Richardson
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Late middle aged. Check. Well-to-do. Check. Amateur. Check. I have a pretty good idea of where I fit in the photography spectrum. I would starve to death if I had to do it for a living, but friends and family are impressed, or are at least polite about it. At a large extended-family function, I met a distant relative who was a retired National Geographic photographer. I mentioned that I did architecture and cityscapes. He said, without enthusiasm, "show me something you like". I brought up

HIs shocked "but that's good!" will stay as one of my happiest memories. Oh, S(006), S 35mm.

Edited by mgrayson3
  • Like 12
  • Thanks 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, mgrayson3 said:

Late middle aged. Check. Well-to-do. Check. Amateur. Check. I have a pretty good idea of where I fit in the photography spectrum. I would starve to death if I had to do it for a living, but friends and family are impressed, or are at least polite about it. At a large extended-family function, I met a distant relative who was a retired National Geographic photographer. I mentioned that I did architecture and cityscapes. He said, without enthusiasm, "show me something you like". I brought up

HIs shocked "but that's good!" will stay as one of my happiest memories. Oh, S(006), S 35mm.

I don't know what impressed me more, the photo or schlepping the 006 and S35mm into the WTC. 

Just kidding. A pretty impressive photograph given the other ones I've seen (and even my own). 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's show one for color.  No DNG this time because I slightly cropped it at the top.  It's AWB by the camera left untouched, one of the strengths of the S3, including very accurate colors.  Keep in mind, the stuff is behind a window so it may not appear as sharp. 

Less compressed JPEGs here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

S3 + 120 Summarit as shot, slightly cropped at the top

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ISO 800 f/2.8 @1/180 sec.

Same as above processed

Edited by Chaemono
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Chaemono said:

Let's show one for color.  No DNG this time because I slightly cropped it at the top.  It's AWB by the camera left untouched, one of the strengths of the S3, including very accurate colors.  Keep in mind, the stuff is behind a window so it may not appear as sharp. 

Less compressed JPEGs here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

S3 + 120 Summarit as shot, slightly cropped at the top

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ISO 800 f/2.8 @1/180 sec.

Same as above processed

Not that I have a dog in this anymore, I think we'd need to see a comparison of the S3's colors to the S007's to figure things out. Portraits would probably be the best comparison.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2020 at 12:32 AM, Milan_S said:

Well to anybody's taste the images can be edited. My work shows always a vintage styled photoshoot and that's what I do i can edit it totally different, but for this image I prefered the yellowish warm vintage christmas colors. In the original DNG file you can go all ways with the S3 file. 

 

 

the file is quite nice....i bit of "NSFW" detail in the golden hanging ball ;)

@xiaubauu2009 and these files are not real 16bit but probably 14bit in a 16bit container [raw digger shows a range only upto 14000 😋😋]

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by frame-it
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 6 Stunden schrieb John Smith:

Not that I have a dog in this anymore, I think we'd need to see a comparison of the S3's colors to the S007's to figure things out. Portraits would probably be the best comparison.

As I said before, I don’t have an S007 nor portraits that I can post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, decurion99 said:

Vincent

I am fully aware of the Leica quality. I am a big fan. I have multiple M lenses, incl. the Noctilux, 50 APO M, Summiluxes and the SL2 and multiple lenses, incl. the APO SLs. It is just a fact though, that the S system is a LOT less wide spread amongst professional studios than Phase One and Hasselblad. Not gonna recite all the reasons for this. What I was told what was said was is that the S camera is mostly bought by well off enthusiasts and people already owning an SL or M.

And it is also the reality that most of those "enthusiasts" shoot mundane subjects with their expensive S camera because it is just not their job to setup shoots, pay for models, location scouts, stylists, etc. And most of them have an intensive job, so time is scarce! So what you end up is dog, flower, and kid pics with an odd landscape here and there. Nothing wrong with that!

Photography has been commoditised and is a wide spread hobby and the money for the companies nowadays lies with the enthusiast segment, all I am saying!

Thanks

 

 

I use my S professionally and it's the camera I use for serious jobs and clients have been happy with the results and often prefer the outlook of the S files compared to other camera systems.

I was even crazy to take the S2 on assignment to Tomorrowland 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, frame-it said:

the file is quite nice....i bit of "NSFW" detail in the golden hanging ball ;)

@xiaubauu2009 and these files are not real 16bit but probably 14bit in a 16bit container [raw digger shows a range only upto 14000 😋😋]

actually, I go through the S006 files... sadly they are 14bit too.... so my notiion that all CCD is 16bit is wrong....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what many of you are wondering.  Can the S3 actually see in the dark and how clean do pushed ISO 1600 files look when the scene isn't well lighted?  This is the best I could do handheld with the 120 Summarit-S @1/125 sec.  ISO 1600 pushed files look pretty clean with LR default sharpening of +40 and NR of +25.

Less compressed JPEGs here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

S3 + 120 Summarit ISO handheld, as shot but slightly straightened here, WB adjusted in LR.  DNG download here:  https://cc2032.zenfolio.com/img/g225089485-o750076470.dat?dl=2&tk=_xeQerUdxlJntfZvTKWzZ_VXhiIn9NF-lqNMZgxkm-o=

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ISO 1600 f2.5 @1/125 sec

Same as above but now with WB adjusted, Exposure +1.73, Contrast +4, Highlights -72, Shadows +80, Whites +2, Blacks -26, Vibrance +15, Saturation -3, NR +25, Sharpening +40

Edited by Chaemono
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's show a couple for sharpness and resolution of detail.

Less compressed JPEGs here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

S3 + 120 Summarit wide open as shot handheld. DNG download here: https://cc2032.zenfolio.com/img/g736249703-o750076470.dat?dl=2&tk=dFro7h7dhkBC4YS5bEzloigz2cAAjK--QNcBgFvOIBc=

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ISO 100 f/2.5 @1/1500 sec.

Same as above processed and cropped

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Focus is on the eye nearest to the camera. 😂

Less compressed JPEG here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

S3 + 120 Summarit Exposure -0.2, Highlights -100, Sharpening +65, NR +10. DNG download here: https://cc2032.zenfolio.com/img/g937037560-o750076470.dat?dl=2&tk=cBjcjKAQzC1TNvFllaOyewXjizOc9xfgghjBFUJMrSs=

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ISO 100 f/2.5 @1/1500 sec.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And now the crop.

Less compressed JPEG here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

One for color, and a little bit for skin tones and lens rendering. 😁 No DNG for this one.

Less compressed JPEG here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

S3 + 120 Summarit processed.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ISO 100 f/2.5 @1/4000 sec.
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

For sharpness and resolution of detail with the lens wide open, again.

Edit - I forgot to mention, focus is on the eye nearest to the camera. 😂

Less compressed JPEGs here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-JkgxSt/

S3 + 120 Summarit as shot. DNG download here: https://cc2032.zenfolio.com/img/g777160958-o750076470.dat?dl=2&tk=MNBzf5byONe_mOr-c82MAECdRxCGdwyQmtj3RPtmQkA=

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ISO 100 f/2.5 @1/3000 sec.

Same as above processed and cropped

Edited by Chaemono
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...