Jump to content
anrotil68

LEICA APO 90-280 F2,8/4 vs PANASONIC 70-200 F2,8

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm going to buy a zoom. I am not sure whether to take a used 90-280 SL LEICA or the new PANASONIC 70.200 F2.8. Has anyone had the opportunity to try them both and make some difference? thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the 70-200 f/2.8 is available to the general public yet. Last I checked, B&H says it'll be available Jan 16. I was considering the same choices that you have mentioned. What, for me, tilted the decision towards the 70-200 was the fact that I can use a 2.0 teleconverter and go up to 400mm. If Leica introduced a teleconverter, or a longer zoom - different story altogether.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I opted for a mint used 90-280, before tariffs bumped US prices on new gear (and now affecting some used gear accordingly). The Lumix wasn't available, and my print tests with the Leica were superb.  Also, with the SL2, the focus clutch mechanism on the Panasonic limits use of back button autofocus, which I occasionally find useful. 

More here...

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a brief few minutes with the 70-200 at Provision (a show here in Toronto put on by the local retailers ) There is a considerable difference in the IQ between the two wide open at maximum aperture, but there is a considerable difference in price as well. I would try to see if you can get a chance to test the Panasonic and see if it works for you or not. The SL glass is magnificent there are hundreds of samples on this forum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Artin said:

I had a brief few minutes with the 70-200 at Provision (a show here in Toronto put on by the local retailers ) There is a considerable difference in the IQ between the two wide open at maximum aperture, but there is a considerable difference in price as well. I would try to see if you can get a chance to test the Panasonic and see if it works for you or not. The SL glass is magnificent there are hundreds of samples on this forum. 

I think I would dispute that ....... image quality (and I have both) is indistinguishable except in the extreme peripheries where the 90-280 wins at wider apertures. 

The problem with the 90-280m is that extra 80mm. Focal length wise it is too short to be ideal for wildlife, but it is too damn big and heavy to carry around as an occasional longish zoom. Plus there is ...... and probably never will be, any teleconverters. 

Optically I doubt the Lumix 70-200 f2.8 will be any advantage over the f4 apart from the extra stop ..... and with 6 stops of stabilisation to play that is mostly negated except for extreme circumstances. So what are you getting for all the extra size, cost and weight ? ...... shallower DOF wide open and that's about it.... oh and apparently one more stop of stabilisation if used on a Lumix S1/S1R. 

Having said all that ...... if I had the extra 3cm required in my backpack and could find something to dump to avoid yet more weight I'd be very tempted .......

Edited by thighslapper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

1 hour ago, jaapv said:

I think the converter is the CL ;) 

How is the CL a converter ? ,, spent an additional 4000 dollars to shoot Apsc , why not just shoot the SL2 in apsc mode. like I said I only had a very brief few minutes with a demo model of the Panasonic 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You still lack 4MP - and carry excessive weight. ;) Somebody is overcharging you by 1000$ for that CL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jaapv said:

You still lack 4MP - and carry excessive weight. ;) Somebody is overcharging you by 1000$ for that CL.

4 Mp is not much at al , and 4000 cnd. is the price of a CL here in Canada.   That is a heavy price for 4 MPX and 100 grams or so.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is more than just 4 MP. 

CL offers better IQ than SL2 in APS-C mode : lower noise (1.5 stops advantage) and slightly better dynamic range. 

So if you also need full frame, SL2 is better obviously. But if you intend to use it primarily in APS-C mode. CL is better, lighter and cheaper. 

So you can choose between these setups 

  • SL 90-280mm f/2.8-4 = SL2 : 90-420mm f/2.8-4 on the SL2. CL 135-420mm f/2.8-4
  • S Pro 70-200 f/2.8 = SL2 : 70-300mm f/2.8 on the SL2. CL : 105-300mm f/2.8
  • TC 1.4x + S Pro 70-200 f/2.8  = SL2 : 100-420mm f/4 on the SL2. CL : 150-420mm f/4
  • TC 2x + S Pro 70-200 f/2.8  = SL2 : 140-600mm f/5.6 on the SL2. CL : 210-600mm f/5.6
  • S Pro 70-200 f/4 = SL2 : 70-300mm f/4 on the SL2. CL : 105-300mm f/4
  • TC 1.4x + S Pro 70-200 f/4  = SL2 : 100-420mm f/5.6 on the SL2. CL : 150-420mm f/5.6
  • TC 2x + S Pro 70-200 f/4  = SL2 : 140-600mm f/8 on the SL2. CL : 210-600mm f/8

70-200 f/2.8 with bunch of TC is more versatile. But IQ will suffer. 

90-280 is probably more convenient : no need to deal with TC. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have yet to see the Panny 2.8. I have the f4 and the SL90-280.

Unlike some other I do see a difference between the two lenses I have. The 90-280 outperforms the 70-200 I have wide open. They get closer toward f8. This is with serious pixel peeping.

I do not doubt some have a 70-200 that matches the Leica. I think (guess) there may be some sample variation in the f4 Panasonic lenses. I compared them on a Panasonic body. Have yet to do so on the SL2.

The 70-200 I have is still a fine lens and when weight is a priority I might take it instead. Although I am also tempted to get rid of the Panasonic and put my R80-200 into service for when I need a lighter lens and get a 135mm prime (Sigma) for the IQ.

Gordon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also own 70200/4.0 Pana and 90-280Leica.

The  Pana seems a good lens but the IQ from the Leica is even more brilliant.

I cant imagine how to handle a big tele zo0m on a leica CL other than putting the lens on a tripod or for occasional use.

I use the 70200 if I want a smaller lens and dont need 200-280 range. I feel it is more adequate to carry. However I feel I get rewarded by IQ if I carry the 90280.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I do not have a disposable income to keep so many lenses in rather the same focal length, and never have any desire to photograph anything in APSC format.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/4/2020 at 5:15 PM, jaapv said:

I think the converter is the CL ;) 

Wouldn’t the CL lack the SL2 in AF accuracy and IBIS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IBIS certainly but focus accuracy should be the same. OIS goes a way to compensate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, tom0511 said:

Also own 70200/4.0 Pana and 90-280Leica.

The  Pana seems a good lens but the IQ from the Leica is even more brilliant.

I cant imagine how to handle a big tele zo0m on a leica CL other than putting the lens on a tripod or for occasional use.

I use the 70200 if I want a smaller lens and dont need 200-280 range. I feel it is more adequate to carry. However I feel I get rewarded by IQ if I carry the 90280.

 

I use the CL with the 105-280    R without any problem. And it does not have OIS. No tripod needed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jaapv said:

I use the CL with the 105-280    R without any problem. And it does not have OIS. No tripod needed. 

Can anyone guess what is Japp’s favourite Leica ?  Lol ... I actually like it too played with it for the first time this weekend at the local dealer. It would make a nice travel companion if I did not have the M240 filling that role 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, jaapv said:

I use the CL with the 105-280    R without any problem. And it does not have OIS. No tripod needed. 

Hmm, I assume you do not use magnified view for focusing then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Artin said:

Can anyone guess what is Japp’s favourite Leica ?  Lol ... I actually like it too played with it for the first time this weekend at the local dealer. It would make a nice travel companion if I did not have the M240 filling that role 

Wrong guess :lol:

1.MM1,

2. M9,

3. CL (daily camera)

Sold as redundant: M240

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By heobro
      카메라 m10을 보면서 뭔가를 찾았습니다.
      빨간색 표시에 반짝이는 접착제가 있습니다.
      다른 카메라는 이런가요?
       
      Looking at camera m10, I found something.
      There is a shiny adhesive on the red mark.
      Are other cameras like this?

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By ashley12234
      Hey everyone, 
      I just got my m2 off ebay and had a look through the viewfinder only to see 2 main very noticeable spots. I attached a picture and the one on the lower left looks much dimmer and looks like a dot and a hair almost? It's kind of light greyish and I think it's a particle or dust but I'm not quite sure. However, in the middle the speck seems much darker (basically black) and more prominent. Could this be separation or is it another speckle of dust (imo it doesn't seem like one). If this has happened to you or you know what it is, any input on how to fix or your thoughts would would be greatly appreciated! 
      Also the shutter curtain on the front seems a little pushed forward and I can see the whole seam on it, is that normal? The curtain works 100% fine but I'm not sure if Im supposed to see the whole seam and overlap of the two curtains. On the back it stays slightly open by 1mm or so (didn't include a pic sorry)... should it cause a light leak? The camera was also recently CLA'd.
      Lastly, the viewfinder has some "gold specks" which I think is separation, but I hope i'm wrong.  
      Please help if you can clarify, recommend a fix, or give any thoughts on ^^. Overall the camera seems amazing and none of the things I mentioned has really bothered me, but if I can learn more about them then it would be great.
      Thanks in advance, 
      Ashley

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Al Brown
      Have searched for a while for the ultimate pouch (neoprene, not leather) for my Leica M lenses. Finally found one for the "average" Leica/Zeiss/Hexanon lens. This bag can also be hooked to the belt via the sewn loop, having enough room for a finger to reach for the lens. I cut off the adjacent carabiner as it was useless. Now I can stack two lenses on top of each other (I have 4) in my ONA bag. I am not naming any brands, I am not associated with anyone, just informing anyone that was after such product that this company is in Munich, Germany and on amazon.de. They have even smaller (XXS) bags but they are too tiny for Leica lenses. The proper size they offer for the pouch IMHO was XS (7cm x 8cm). The bags are not the icons of design, nor very beautiful, but they do get the job done.

      PLEASE SHARE YOUR LEICA LENS POUCH EXPERIENCE(S).

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Frank_W
      Verkaufe aus gesundheitlichen Gründen eine Leica SL, wenig benutzt und daher nahezu neuwertig und ohne Gebrauchsspuren. Gekauft im Juli 2017 hat die Kamera weniger als 10.000 Auslösungen. Die Kamera wird verkauft im Originalkarton und allem darin befindlichen Zubehör. 
      Gerne weitere Auskünfte per PN oder Email.
      Verkauf an Selbstabholer oder Versand (dann bitte Vorkasse oder Paypal).
      Privatverkauf, keine Garantie, keine Rückgabe.
    • By Al Brown
      Please share your opinion - if you have used or owned both lenses or any opinion on the topic. Mostly interested in comparison of render, sharpness, bokeh, pop etc. according to you - digital sensor or film.

      Early reports indicated the Hexanons were inferior. According to LHSA "some Hexanon early samples were reported to have focusing discrepancies, long since resolved, and that adversely affected initial sales. The current consensus: Konica KM and Leica M lenses, even those with longer focal lengths and wider apertures, can be used interchangeably on both cameras without problems." Lots of posts ot the tiny flange difference between the cameras, but here we discuss the lens.

      Mr. Rockwell even went as far as comparing the build of Summicron 50 (V) to the Hexanon-M 50 side by side and they indeed look almost identical. Check the pic on his webpage under the Hexanon topic.
      I have recently acquired a Hexanon-M 50/2 (photographed below on my M) and it is a stellar performer, slightly better wide open (especially corners) compared to Summicron M 50/2 (IV) in all the tests I did.
      YMMV.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy