Jump to content

M 11 will be around in less than 4 years. The speculations and facts.


Recommended Posts

Yes, I'm glad I'm not in the shoes of the M 11 designers. The M 11 tread like this , will develop such expectations that it will be difficult to fulfill them. A friend told me, never to buy the most new computer , but his former generation. It will deliver, a little bit less, but will be cheaper. The same is to see in the M 10 nowadays it's possible to buy new ones for under € 6000,- 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Paulus said:

Yes, I'm glad I'm not in the shoes of the M 11 designers. The M 11 tread like this , will develop such expectations that it will be difficult to fulfill them. A friend told me, never to buy the most new computer , but his former generation. It will deliver, a little bit less, but will be cheaper. The same is to see in the M 10 nowadays it's possible to buy new ones for under € 6000,- 

If only I had this restraint......But alas, I definitely do not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2018 at 1:42 PM, Paulus said:

This time , I promised myself not to buy a new M before the M 10 P version got out. That helps....😉

I posted somewhere on this forum that I was completely happy with the M10 and for the first time didn't feel the need to upgrade to the M10P.

I think two weeks later I bought the M10P...Doh!

I would love to see the M11 have the below two features but this is not speculation nor fact but only my wish list. 

1. Articulating screen
2. RF focus assist: (example - when the images align it flashes green)

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 7 Minuten schrieb dkmoore:

I posted somewhere on this forum that I was completely happy with the M10 and for the first time didn't feel the need to upgrade to the M10P.

I think two weeks later I bought the M10P...Doh!

 

Errare humanum est..

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just take M10P and stick in a possibility to use Electronic First Curtain Sync when in LV/advanced meter modes. Make that mode as delayless as the mechanical mode. Wouldn't mind an electronic shutter; would help with the fast glass in daylight. If possible, really work the Visoflex to match the best of competition wrt. EVF framerate/quality. Or what am I talking about, the SL is ahead everyone. Maybe offer a crazy optional EVF with humongous screen that you watch from top-down like you do with TLR cameras.

 

24 megapixels is enough. Maybe for the M11P they could actually bring back the 18 megapixel CCD from M9

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I reviewed my photographes while being in the train. After I have deleted one intentionally I was interuoted I had a chat with my wife. Going back to my camera I pressed the middle button so that the infos on the screen would disappear. As they did NOT disappear I pressed the button several times . . . . until I realised . . . .

YES I was still in the dekete mode and about 10 pictures are deleted. Too stupid.

My suggestion for the M11: It should always be a 2-step process to delete an image. Stupid enough this is not the first time that it happens to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually you will find that the file names will be quite a bit scrambled or incomplete after rescue but you can usually decipher them by looking at the time stamps and sorting in time stamp order. 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, .DNG files might be listed as .TIF, making them unreadable. The simple solution is to rename them .DNG. Apparently the file type is misread by the recovery software, but the file header is intact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a free tool that you get (or used to get) with San Disk cards, called Rescue Pro but the free version is a bit flaky. The proper versions are very expensive. I use a different program called Recoverit. https://recoverit.wondershare.net/ad/data-recovery.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxajN4OnT3wIVybTtCh1eFAIFEAAYASAAEgIqfvD_BwE 

Edited by wlaidlaw
Link to post
Share on other sites

This report by a visitor to Wetzlar suggests that Leica is open to a second M line with EVF along with continuation and improvement to the current M line, based on the direction set with the M10....

https://photobasecamp.com/leica-factory-future-product-news/

Also included are hints at ideas being considered with the SL system as well as Leica customer service.

Jeff

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot fathom why would an M user need an EVF in-camera, just get a great Fuji X100F or X-Pro2.  I used those lines for 7 years before switching to M and now they are rarely used.  Which is a shame because the lenses are great and their range is awesome.  But it's just impossible to compose and think photographically without the rangefinder focus anymore...  Well I started photography on a Soviet Leica clone so the muscle memory was there.

Anyway all this wishful thinking strikes me as idle and rather unfocused, as the M trajectory is very clear -- faithful to the 100 years of Leica, minimalist, simple, focusing on the light, aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and the rangefinder.  As they say, what part of no (bells and whistles) you don't understand?:) . Increasing resolution, sensitivity, might have some room.  We don't need anything else, really.  It would be great to have a digital Leica that will last a 100 years!  

I have a Pentax K-1 DSLR with Limited lenses for fast motion photography (kids), the XF line for huge telephoto/versatility, and an X1D for enormous resolution/that amazing medium format look.  You can get all those features for various purposes.  You don't need them in an M; you need them not to be in an M.

Don't ask, what features can I have in a Leica.
Ask, what features can I easily not have in a Leica?

Edited by setuporg
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, setuporg said:

Cannot fathom why would an M user need an EVF in-camera, just get a great Fuji X100F or X-Pro2.

Access to the lens system with a sensor optimised for them. A good EVF implementation allows off-centre focusing with no rangefinder or lens calibration misery. Think of it as a mini-SL or a full-frame CL with an M-series form-factor. There are currently no full-frame cameras on the market with these attributes.

Alternatively Leica could (should!) fix the M’s external EVF design, which is incongruous with the camera and price point (blackout times, resolution, lack of hot-shoe lock, unreliable & slow auto-switching, etc etc). 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tailwagger said:

Interesting report. I'll admit that I'm wrestling with the notion of an SL2 versus holding my breadth for an EVF M-mount cam. 

Me too! This is what made me interested as well whilst I was there. I love the M, but I also love the SL with M lenses. I can see myself always having a rangefinder M, but a second EVF M for wide angle or harder to focus lenses would be perfect for me. 

Mike

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...