ramarren Posted April 19, 2016 Share #141 Posted April 19, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) I have tried to help occasionally, but my responses have been ignored and 忘不了 just keeps complaining. Since all 忘不了 seems to want to do is complain, I have set the address to be ignored so that I don't have to read the bitterness. But with everyone responding with quotes, it seems impossible to ignore 忘不了. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 19, 2016 Posted April 19, 2016 Hi ramarren, Take a look here Leica SL Firmware v.2.0 answers our wishes. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
scott kirkpatrick Posted April 19, 2016 Share #142 Posted April 19, 2016 I appreciate your OCD; thank you! Actually, it sounds more like Asperger's. I suspect many of us have some. scott Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamdewilde Posted April 19, 2016 Share #143 Posted April 19, 2016 Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that the 24mm lens is actually more like 21-22mm that is then cropped pretty significantly. Exactly like the issue with the Q. It's fine because for the most part the EVF applies this crop when you're shooting. So you kinda know what you're getting, or don't know what you're missing so to speak. BUT once in a while I'll compose a scene and it'll be using a glitched EVF view somehow. So I'll get the full 21mm-22mm frame with dark corners. I won't really notice but when I go home to load the images, things I didn't want cut off are now cut off. And I'll have to open the DNG with another RAW developer to get my full scene to save said picture. This hasn't happened to me with the Q that I can recall.. But it happens fairly often (well enough to notice after the fact) with the SL. Anyone else notice this? Obviously you have to use the 24-90 zoom so M/R users would never see/know about this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramarren Posted April 19, 2016 Share #144 Posted April 19, 2016 Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that the 24mm lens is actually more like 21-22mm that is then cropped pretty significantly. Exactly like the issue with the Q. It's fine because for the most part the EVF applies this crop when you're shooting. So you kinda know what you're getting, or don't know what you're missing so to speak. BUT once in a while I'll compose a scene and it'll be using a glitched EVF view somehow. So I'll get the full 21mm-22mm frame with dark corners. I won't really notice but when I go home to load the images, things I didn't want cut off are now cut off. And I'll have to open the DNG with another RAW developer to get my full scene to save said picture. This hasn't happened to me with the Q that I can recall.. But it happens fairly often (well enough to notice after the fact) with the SL. Anyone else notice this? Obviously you have to use the 24-90 zoom so M/R users would never see/know about this. I presume "the 24mm lens" means the SL24-90 set to 24mm focal length. The SL24-90 is designed for image correction, which is applied both in-camera and in raw converters that have the right version of DNG processing in them (the correction parameters are embedded in the DNG file's metadata for processing at raw conversion time according to the DNG v1.3 or v1.4 specification). With such lenses, it is normal that the listed focal length is for the processed image's angle of view. Lightroom 6.4 and later have the correct camera calibration and the correct image processing algorithms for these raw files. I haven't seen the behavior you mention at all, where the unprocessed image is visible in the SL viewfinder—not with firmware 1.2, with any of the beta releases that led up to firmware 2.0, nor with firmware 2.0 release—and not in any JPEG or raw file from the SL. If you're not using the current Lightroom (or Adobe Camera Raw) to process the images, then it could be a processing issue ... but that doesn't explain seeing the unprocessed image on the SL's EVF. Puzzling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted April 20, 2016 Share #145 Posted April 20, 2016 Not sure if it's related to the new firmware but I've had my first lock up yesterday. I turned the camera on and by the time I was looking in the VF, the image was frozen. Removing the battery fixed the issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramarren Posted April 20, 2016 Share #146 Posted April 20, 2016 A lock-up like that has been reported now and then. I think I only saw one once, on one of the beta firmware installs (perhaps the first one). It didn't happen again. I wouldn't worry about it unless it happens frequently, and then I'd try doing a full reset and configuring the camera from factory defaults before considering it a problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted April 20, 2016 Share #147 Posted April 20, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Oh definitely I wouldn't worry about an isolated case, unless it occurs again. Probably just a hiccup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trond Posted April 20, 2016 Share #148 Posted April 20, 2016 Dear Edward, Previously with FW 1.2 I have found the SL to lock up in the following situation: 1. The SL in on, but in power down mode with the displays off. 2. The shutter release is pressed briefly to turn the camera on. 3. The SL is then turned off before the display reads "Ready". 4. The SL will now be locked up and completely unresponsive, and the display will stay lit even if the on/off switch is in the "off" position. The battery will have to be removed to restart the camera and get it working again. This situation does not happen every time but quite frequently, maybe two or three times a month when the SL is used almost on a daily basis. This may seem like a strange ting to do, but happens quite frequently after shooting. Then putting the SL back in the bag, but just realizing it is still on, and then turn it off, and it locks up. A small annoyance, but if you do not notice and remove the battery immediately, you are left with an empty battery really quick. I have not had this lockup with FW 2.0 Best regards Trond Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted April 20, 2016 Share #149 Posted April 20, 2016 I'm unable to duplicate this. Four tries, with an R lens, in A mode. I tried switching off as close as possible after wakeup and several seconds later, before wakeup was complete. scott Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trond Posted April 20, 2016 Share #150 Posted April 20, 2016 Dear Scott, I have not seen this problem with FW 2.0. I have not tried with R lenses, I use 24-90 mm most of the time. Best regards Trond Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted April 20, 2016 Share #151 Posted April 20, 2016 ..... ah .... they mysterious 'lock-up' gremlin has left Solms and moved to Wetzlar.... he has repeated his mischief with almost every Leica digital camera to date ...... and despite endless threads on the subject no-one has a clue how he is doing it ..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugues33 Posted April 20, 2016 Share #152 Posted April 20, 2016 The serial number of the lens (90/280mm) is N/A since firmware 2.0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
meerec Posted April 20, 2016 Share #153 Posted April 20, 2016 The serial number of the lens (90/280mm) is N/A since firmware 2.0 Can't be intentional ... must be a bug. What others think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted April 20, 2016 Share #154 Posted April 20, 2016 Dear Edward, Previously with FW 1.2 I have found the SL to lock up in the following situation: 1. The SL in on, but in power down mode with the displays off. 2. The shutter release is pressed briefly to turn the camera on. 3. The SL is then turned off before the display reads "Ready". 4. The SL will now be locked up and completely unresponsive, and the display will stay lit even if the on/off switch is in the "off" position. The battery will have to be removed to restart the camera and get it working again. This situation does not happen every time but quite frequently, maybe two or three times a month when the SL is used almost on a daily basis. This may seem like a strange ting to do, but happens quite frequently after shooting. Then putting the SL back in the bag, but just realizing it is still on, and then turn it off, and it locks up. A small annoyance, but if you do not notice and remove the battery immediately, you are left with an empty battery really quick. I have not had this lockup with FW 2.0 Best regards Trond Dear Trond, Thank you very much for the info. So far I've only had one lock up in 2 months of ownership, with fw 2.0, and as I described it, not similar to your experience. Mine froze just after I turned the camera on. Anyhow I will report back if I have another one and what sequence of events caused it. Best regards, Edward Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlashGordonPhotography Posted April 20, 2016 Share #155 Posted April 20, 2016 Can't be intentional ... must be a bug. What others think? It's a bug. Gordon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MediaFotografie Posted April 20, 2016 Share #156 Posted April 20, 2016 It's a bug. Gordon it's a bug and not restricted to the 90-280, all SL und TL lenses are affected http://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/259283-leica-sl-firmware-v20-answers-our-wishes/?p=3029215 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpclee Posted April 20, 2016 Share #157 Posted April 20, 2016 Is it ironic that 忘不了literally means "cannot be forgotten"... I have tried to help occasionally, but my responses have been ignored and 忘不了 just keeps complaining. Since all 忘不了 seems to want to do is complain, I have set the address to be ignored so that I don't have to read the bitterness. But with everyone responding with quotes, it seems impossible to ignore 忘不了. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramarren Posted April 20, 2016 Share #158 Posted April 20, 2016 it's a bug and not restricted to the 90-280, all SL und TL lenses are affected http://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/259283-leica-sl-firmware-v20-answers-our-wishes/?p=3029215 It is possible that the lens serial number was intentionally removed in order to fix some other, more important bug having to do with EXIF data display and retention. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
larsv Posted April 20, 2016 Share #159 Posted April 20, 2016 I also look at the early 1.1 firmware can only buy a SL, 2 firmware or not, forced to prepare to sell SL. Please do and leave us alone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamdewilde Posted April 20, 2016 Share #160 Posted April 20, 2016 Hi Edward, I actually had several (5-6) lockups on version 1.x on the SL. So far with v2 I've not had any yet. Also funny to note. I had an M-adapter T and every time you mounted an M lens it would let you take one image, then the EVF would go black for a few seconds. I suspect while the laser turned on to read the 6-bit coding. And apply corrections to EVF and DNG/JPG. Then after asking a friend, I found out this wasn't normal. So I took my M-adapter T back to the store and switched it for another one. And the problem went away. BUT now that I've updated to V2 firmware, the problem is back. Luckily I don't switch M lenses often, so it doesn't really bother me. Also to note, I tried this on another SL body in the shop (when I exchanged the adapter) and it was doing the same thing on the other SL. (I didn't buy the SL for use with M or R lenses, I bought it for the AF, so I couldn't care less if Leica fixes this weird bug or not.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.