Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Honestly, I'm not sure yet if I love my new M4-P. It's my first film M and first film experience in over ten digital years. We're just now getting acquainted. But I expect the larger question will be, do I really want to go back to film? I want to give it a try.

 

John

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

M4 is the last great Leitz More modern than 2 or 3 in loading and rewind. Not as many made and most want meter ttl. No battery and a shutter click that is pure poetry for anyone who enjoys machines.

Agreed! I bought my M4 new in '68 when I could have had a new M3 for the same price. I never regretted getting the M4 instead.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

M4 is the last great Leitz More modern than 2 or 3 in loading and rewind. Not as many made and most want meter ttl. No battery and a shutter click that is pure poetry for anyone who enjoys machines.

 

Don't tell that to the M5 guys and gals.

Edited by SteveYork
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

:-) ah but its true, not to say M5 isn't a good camera, but it in this world of things that go beep in the night where no adventure is possible without an outlet to recharge the battery, its wonderful to have in your hands mechanical craftsmanship rugged enough to be a favorite of cameramen in vietnam, and need only enough film in your pocket to bring home the shot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

M4 is the last great Leitz More modern than 2 or 3 in loading and rewind. Not as many made and most want meter ttl. No battery and a shutter click that is pure poetry for anyone who enjoys machines.

 

Call me weird, but I honestly prefer the rewind on the Barnacks and M3/2/P to the angled one first seen on the M4. In my honest oppinion all Leicas the film Ms have a very nice sounding shutter for us that enjoy machines and I don't considder the M4s to be the last great ones. They are great, but so are the ones that succeeded them, and that includes - despites its DX coder idiosyncracies - the M7.

Carl

Edited by cbretteville
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

:-) ah but its true, not to say M5 isn't a good camera, but it in this world of things that go beep in the night where no adventure is possible without an outlet to recharge the battery, its wonderful to have in your hands mechanical craftsmanship rugged enough to be a favorite of cameramen in vietnam, and need only enough film in your pocket to bring home the shot.

 

Yes, I understand the sentiment, but the juice required to operate only a meter is very small. Not like an M7, where it seemed I was changing batteries every 6 months, but the batteries in my Leicaflex and M5s last hundreds of rolls. I've owned a bunch of Ms over the last two decades and in terms of craftsmanship + practicality I liked the M5 the best. Indeed, it's the only rangefinder I have left. Too bad I came to it so late (I shoot mostly Leicaflex now). I was actually a bit nonplused with the one M4 I owned several years back (before I dropped it into the ocean by accident). I just expected something more, something more 'magical.' And remember, that handheld meter runs on batteries too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

M4 is the last great Leitz More modern than 2 or 3 in loading and rewind. Not as many made and most want meter ttl. No battery and a shutter click that is pure poetry for anyone who enjoys machines.

 

Yes, in fact it was soon after Nick started this thread that I picked up mine from the nice people at Red Dot.

I do enjoy using it.

 

Call me weird, but I honestly prefer the rewind on the Barnacks and M3/2/P to the angled one first seen on the M4.

Carl

 

Me too - so I had the rewind crank changed to a straight M3/2 type.

Took about 30 secs.

 

Falstaff

Link to post
Share on other sites

After a while you really don't need after except for critical type shots. And more to the point I enjoy looking through the viewfinder and seeing only the frame lines. No distractions. Not for everyone that's okay. Don't need the price zooming. Just saying after the M4 things changed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too - so I had the rewind crank changed to a straight M3/2 type.Took about 30 secs.

 

The rewind or the windon crank? I can beleive swapping the wind on crank took you 30 seconds (it did on my M6), but how do you fit the knob of an M3/2/P the angled rewind axle of an M4?

Carl

Link to post
Share on other sites

M4 is the last great Leitz More modern than 2 or 3 in loading and rewind. Not as many made and most want meter ttl. No battery and a shutter click that is pure poetry for anyone who enjoys machines.

 

I agree that the modern loading and rewind is a big improvement in real world and practical everyday use. And while I may like the looks of the M3 and the current MP film advance lever and rewind lever (I think the MP really has them primarily for nostalgia/marketing reasons), the actual everyday use of the M4/M6 style loading and rewind is so much better. Fast film changes are often times paramount for me. And I even prefer the plastic tipped two-piece advance lever as it's more comfortable on my thumb tip and won't eventually rub my baby soft skin off.... :)

 

The only big thing I found lacking (for me) with the M4 is that it doesn't have a finger guard for the lens release button. I'm not sure why that was (and it returned with the M6.) I often hold the camera in my right hand with my thumb on the rear and two fingers on the front just past the self timer lever, and down at my right side (with the strap wrapped around my wrist.) I found that I was getting too close to releasing the lens lock as my forefinger was so near the button. So I had DAG install the M3 finger guard on my M4. I also had the frame lines masked out leaving only the 35 and 50. I prefer less clutter, too.

 

And remember, that handheld meter runs on batteries too.

 

My meter only needs food, water, and sleep. And sometimes a hat to keep it warm in colder weather. :)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The rewind or the windon crank? I can beleive swapping the wind on crank took you 30 seconds (it did on my M6), but how do you fit the knob of an M3/2/P the angled rewind axle of an M4?

Carl

 

Sorry, I was not clear. It is the wind-on crank for advancing the film that I had changed.

Falstaff

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you do it yourself? I'm considering this 'upgrade' for my M6.

 

No problem doing it your self. Remove one retaining ring and replace the original with a straight one. I did this on my M6 with a wind on lever purchased from DAG. I've since put the original back.

 

You should use a flexiclamp to losen and fasten the retaining ring, it is easy to get marks on it if you use a pair of pliers.

 

Carl

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you do it yourself? I'm considering this 'upgrade' for my M6.

 

No I didn't but it was done by an ex-Leica tech while I watched.

 

 

No problem doing it your self. Remove one retaining ring and replace the original with a straight one. I did this on my M6 with a wind on lever purchased from DAG. I've since put the original back.

 

You should use a flexiclamp to losen and fasten the retaining ring, it is easy to get marks on it if you use a pair of pliers.

 

Carl

 

As Carl says, do not use pliers.

The man who did it used a rubbery material to get a good grip to the top retaining ring and just unscrewed it, changed the lever and screwed the top back on.

 

Falstaff

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It took a while but I eventually found an Alden loader capable of 200' so I'll split the roll half.

 

I also look forward to trying this film. I'm in the process of going through the 50+-page thread over at RFF which is really an interesting (and time consuming) read.

Edited by philipus
Link to post
Share on other sites

Alas, my M3 is up for sale, but my nearly new 1983 M4-P arrived today! I have an original M4-P brochure I picked up new in 1980 when I bought my used M4-2 at Pacific Camera on Girard St. in La Jolla. I couldn't afford the M4-P. I was pleased with the M4-2. Now, thirty-three years later, I have my M4-P to go with my brochure! <chuckle>

 

8578909458_729afa4867_c.jpg

L1004595 by chief1120, on Flickr

 

8578911878_3b816ca5d7_c.jpg

L1004597 by chief1120, on Flickr

  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...