Jump to content

stephen.w

Members
  • Content Count

    1,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About stephen.w

  • Rank
    Erfahrener Benutzer

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Oxford
  • Country
    empty/leer

Recent Profile Visitors

261 profile views
  1. I really just meant that they are similar in terms of lens design philosophy: small, sharp, well-made, comparatively cheap.
  2. The Zeiss 35 2.8 C-Biogon is quite close to a modern version of this lens. I'd like a 50mm 1.5 Summarit in M-mount.
  3. How do you find the ergonomics of the Summaron 28? I came very close to getting one a few years ago, but found the focus throw very long for such a slow lens, with the close focus almost up at 9 o' clock. To the OP, the Elmarit asph (either version, although mine is v1) is a very nice lens that won't break the bank.
  4. What is list price for this lens? Is it hard to come by / more expensive in silver? Is the colour important to you? Meister Camera sells the lens new for 4,777 euros. Personally I would spend the extra few hundred euros for a new lens with full warranty. https://www.meister-camera.com/de/produkt/5563/leica-summilux-m-1435mm-asph
  5. Ultravids are made in Germany, the Trinovids (older optical formula, at least some in the product lineup aren't waterproof) are made in Portugal. I went for Ultravids. https://us.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/Global/2018/A-new-design-for-an-elegant-classic
  6. It didn't affect your premiums, really? Who is your insurer? My (rather more negative) impression of insurers is that the house always wins. So better not to insure things you can replace out of hand.
  7. I bought mine through the a la carte program a few years ago (0.58x viewfinder, black chrome, no logo). Re M7.2: I would like some of the additional features of the Hexar RF: shutter speeds up to 1/4000s, auto film loading, auto film advance.
  8. I can understand the Summilux - slow seller and very expensive to make, in terms of raw glass, labour, expertise - but it seems strange that canned the Elmar 3.8 too. They no longer have any 24mm lenses in the catalogue. Sad. I suppose the focal length enjoyed a renaissance when the M8 was released and became less popular with the move to full frame.
  9. Sure - I have a Fuji camera which does that. There are also SLRs, TLRs, view cameras, and more. But Einst_stein and I were talking about cameras for mounting M lenses on, and what one's preferences might be, and there I think there are only the two alternatives mentioned.
  10. I do think it is a different 'way of seeing', and in that sense an attraction in itself, but can also see why you and others might prefer mirrorless EVF only cameras
  11. The shape reminds me a bit of the Hexar RF, which in some ways was my favourite M camera. I couldn't spend what they are asking for it, but, as Philip said, I wish them well with an interesting camera.
  12. What OS are you running? I think that Sierra and older don't autoupdate anymore.
  13. They should also stop with the many, many layers of premium-grade cardboard that Leica cameras come packaged in (unless this has also changed?)
×
×
  • Create New...