Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm going to Osaka, and Tokyo for my first time.  I'm taking my M10 and  I wonder which lenses to take. I would like to shoot architecture, landscapes and also street photography, details. And the lights at night. Here are the options I have

Tri Elmar 28-35-50

Tri Elmar 16-18-21

21/1.4 - 24/1.4 - 28/1.4 - 35/1.4 - 50/1.4

I was thinking the Tri Elmar 28-35-50 for the day and the 21/1.4 for the architecture and the night

???

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I no longer carry more than one lens on a trip like this: I look for shots that fit the lens I have and don't fret about shots it doesn't fit. With your lenses I'd just pick whichever Tri-Elmar best fits your style.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What’s your favourite lens out of the lot? That would be the first one I pack every time for a trip as I’d always miss it.

If I was to answer for myself. I would take the 35mm and the WATE from your selection. From my own selection, I would be taking a 90mm as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks all of you 👍

I like buildings, wide pictures, 35mm is the maximum, but I was thinking about some pictures of details.

At first I was thinking about taking only the 35 but is it wide enough for buildings 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lr, and I'm sure other post processing software, does a very good job of making panoramas from multiple images.  I use it all the time when the lens isn't wide enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KFo said:

Lr, and I'm sure other post processing software, does a very good job of making panoramas from multiple images.  I use it all the time when the lens isn't wide enough.

yes it's an idea but I don't like that, I don't like to process my pictures, maybe the contrast or things like that but thats all, maybe i'm too used to shoot film 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience in Tokyo and Osaka, the buildings are massive in parts of the city, and there are also very cramped areas. I would take the WATE and the 35mm 1.4 and 50mm 1.4 if it were me. The 50 will help for details and any "normal" perspectives, while the 35mm can be the standard lens. Obviously the WATE will do wide angles. I think you will appreciate having the range of focal lengths. It is only three fairly small lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Stuart Richardson said:

It is only three fairly small lenses.

🤣 yes plus the bag, plus the phone, plus the external batterie, plus my wife bottle of water, plus .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stuart Richardson said:

In my experience in Tokyo and Osaka, the buildings are massive in parts of the city, and there are also very cramped areas. I would take the WATE and the 35mm 1.4 and 50mm 1.4 if it were me. The 50 will help for details and any "normal" perspectives, while the 35mm can be the standard lens. Obviously the WATE will do wide angles. I think you will appreciate having the range of focal lengths. It is only three fairly small lenses.

Have been many times to Japan and totally agree with Stuart's advice.

You'll be out in the cities for long-days , so carrying the least weight will be wise. 

 

My last trip to Tokyo I only carried my 35FLE and it was ideal for >90% of my shots

 

As it's your first trip to Tokyo, a must see visit is to Map Camera store on the west side of Shinjuku train station.  I guarantee your jaw will hit the floor when you see the Leica gear there.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dugby said:

As it's your first trip to Tokyo, a must see visit is to Map Camera store on the west side of Shinjuku train station.  I guarantee your jaw will hit the floor when you see the Leica gear there.

👍 I have a huge list of camera stores and of course the Nikon Museum, the Fuji Museum and the Metropolitan museum of photography.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am familiar with all your Summiluxes, but not familiar with the Tele Elmars or Osaka/Tokyo, but if I was to limit myself with only two lenses for a city visit, I'd choose the 24 and 50 Summiluxes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take only the 24/1.4 or 28/1.4 depending upon which you prefer and whether you can see the entire viewfinder.   You can always move closer or crop a bit for detailed stuff. 

I just don't like fussing about with gear on holiday.  The last time we went away I shot everything all week with a 24mm lens and enjoyed the freedom.  Your wife will thank you for not procrastinating over photo opportunities and you'll feel lighter and less stressed 😀

Link to post
Share on other sites

peoples with experience in Japan, do you think f/4 is enough for night photography considering there is a lot of light in the streets (upon the pictures I see) ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be enough but i would buy and do not carry a f4 lens (other than a tele lens if i would have one).
I believe that handheld night photography give me better results if i can choose the aperture/speed without lowering shutter time or rising iso to get a correct exposure.
Shooting wide open may reduce the DOF i want and lowering speed may give me too much motion blur from the camera and from moving objects  like people and vehicles.

Zitat

I was thinking the Tri Elmar 28-35-50 for the day and the 21/1.4 for the architecture and the night

That sounds as a good choice, cities with tall buildings need a wide lens, if streets are narrow even wider.

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...