jaapv Posted October 7 Share #2941 Posted October 7 Advertisement (gone after registration) 2 hours ago, pgh said: the title alone confirms this is stupid trash clickbait geared to get views. save yourself the minutes. The bl***y fool even goes on about resistance against Leica for adding IBIS and a flip screen. Vlogging about M.? IBIS? Flip screen? Stupid trash clickbait indeed. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 7 Posted October 7 Hi jaapv, Take a look here EVF M rumoured. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
dsalamena Posted October 7 Share #2942 Posted October 7 56 minutes ago, luigi bertolotti said: Best of both+1 worlds 😉.. So let's name it QCL-M and all of us are happy, will buy it and Leica will be happy too😂 Even better, just make a new CL with a modern aps-c sensor and IBIS. It would be a perfect camera, even too good for travel photography. That's why Leica will never make it... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rramesh Posted October 7 Share #2943 Posted October 7 It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted October 7 Share #2944 Posted October 7 Obvious solution is to leave off both rear screen and fit no viefinder at all (might also have to leave off the hotsoe to remove temptation to fit an external OVF) and market the camera as being utterly purist with no distractions. Imagine the tantalising wait before downloading cards onto a computer to see if you have anything remotely worth looking at. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T25UFO Posted October 7 Share #2945 Posted October 7 6 hours ago, rramesh said: It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M. Er . . . so where do you put the shutter? All these silly rumours and pointless speculation. I know for certain what is coming next: a SL3-S Reporter with a Monochrome sensor and no rear screen. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IkarusJohn Posted October 7 Share #2946 Posted October 7 7 hours ago, rramesh said: It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M. Only if it has a global shutter 🤔 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted October 7 Share #2947 Posted October 7 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) 9 hours ago, rramesh said: It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M. How about register distance? Could a Q have the same register as M cameras with M lenses? It would need a thick adapter i suppose and M lens users have no reason to endure such unwanted accessory. Rather keep the simple idea of an M camera with the RF replaced by an EVF, as suggested since the beginning of the EVF-M project. The EVF-M could use the roller cam of M cameras for focus magnification this way. Edited October 7 by lct 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted October 7 Share #2948 Posted October 7 People forget that the Q is an integrated sensor-shutter-aperture-lens unit <a complete camera in essence> with a box with peripherals stuck on. 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreiPunkte Posted October 7 Share #2949 Posted October 7 ... and ZACK BOOM BANG!!!!! We have a real Retro Style Camera which was formaly known as Fuji EX1. How cool! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted October 7 Share #2950 Posted October 7 3 hours ago, lct said: How about register distance? Could a Q have the same register as M cameras with M lenses? It would need a thick adapter i suppose and M lens users have no reason to endure such unwanted accessory. Rather keep the simple idea of an M camera with the RF replaced by an EVF, as suggested since the beginning of the EVF-M project. The EVF-M could use the roller cam of M cameras for focus magnification this way. No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DadDadDaddyo Posted October 7 Share #2951 Posted October 7 Maybe you take the lens cap off and then put it back on, real fast... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JNK100 Posted October 7 Share #2952 Posted October 7 (edited) 12 hours ago, rramesh said: It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M. Perhaps but impossible. Edited October 7 by JNK100 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nussbusch Posted October 7 Share #2953 Posted October 7 vor 6 Stunden schrieb pgk: Obvious solution is to leave off both rear screen and fit no viefinder at all (might also have to leave off the hotsoe to remove temptation to fit an external OVF) and market the camera as being utterly purist with no distractions. Imagine the tantalising wait before downloading cards onto a computer to see if you have anything remotely worth looking at. And one could allow download of the files after a wait of one week to reduce the pace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted October 7 Share #2954 Posted October 7 4 hours ago, lct said: How about register distance? Could a Q have the same register as M cameras with M lenses? It would need a thick adapter i suppose and M lens users have no reason to endure such unwanted accessory. Rather keep the simple idea of an M camera with the RF replaced by an EVF, as suggested since the beginning of the EVF-M project. The EVF-M could use the roller cam of M cameras for focus magnification this way. I’m sure that far more users would want the adapter if the price were tripled. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrMi Posted October 7 Share #2955 Posted October 7 2 hours ago, DadDadDaddyo said: Maybe you take the lens cap off and then put it back on, real fast... Electronic shutter is a better solution, even with its rolling shutter effect. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenInTime Posted October 7 Share #2956 Posted October 7 21 minutes ago, SrMi said: Electronic shutter is a better solution, even with its rolling shutter effect. Lartigue famously thought so with his 1912 racing car. I'm not so sure; even trolleybuses look speedy. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! GXR-M-module electronic shutter mode ( camera inverted to get the read-out tilting to the right ). 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! GXR-M-module electronic shutter mode ( camera inverted to get the read-out tilting to the right ). ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/419143-evf-m-rumoured/?do=findComment&comment=5872879'>More sharing options...
SrMi Posted October 7 Share #2957 Posted October 7 (edited) 8 hours ago, IkarusJohn said: Only if it has a global shutter 🤔 A stacked sensor is sufficient. It exhibits the same rolling shutter effect as the mechanical shutter. Edited October 7 by SrMi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenInTime Posted October 7 Share #2958 Posted October 7 4 minutes ago, SrMi said: A stacked sensor is sufficient. It exhibits the same rolling shutter effect as the mechanical shutter. Indeed. The shutterless Nikon ZR is generating far more positive comments than other shutterless attempts at M sized full frame camera such as the Sigma Fp and Lumix S9. It uses a semi-stacked 24 Mpixel sensor, and has IBIS; though lacks an EVF. Z6II is the more stills friendly EVF offering. The question needs to asked why the SL3-S not hold out for this sensor or the larger also semi-stacker S1II sensor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted October 7 Share #2959 Posted October 7 Nikon has been buying sensors from Sony. But there are many requirements to be met for a design choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IkarusJohn Posted October 7 Share #2960 Posted October 7 1 hour ago, SrMi said: A stacked sensor is sufficient. It exhibits the same rolling shutter effect as the mechanical shutter. My comment was a joke - rolling shutter would kill the camera at birth … Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now