EVF M rumoured

[jaapv]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, pgh said:

the title alone confirms this is stupid trash clickbait geared to get views. save yourself the minutes. 

The bl***y fool even goes on about resistance against Leica for adding IBIS and a flip screen. Vlogging about M.? IBIS? Flip screen?  Stupid trash clickbait indeed.  

[dsalamena]

56 minutes ago, luigi bertolotti said:

Best of both+1 worlds 😉.. So let's name it QCL-M and all of us are happy, will buy it and Leica will be happy too😂

Even better, just make a new CL with a modern aps-c sensor and IBIS. It would be a perfect camera, even too good for travel photography. That's why Leica will never make it...

[rramesh]

It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M.

[pgk]

Obvious solution is to leave off both rear screen and fit no viefinder at all (might also have to leave off the hotsoe to remove temptation to fit an external OVF) and market the camera as being utterly purist with no distractions. Imagine the tantalising wait before downloading cards onto a computer to see if you have anything remotely worth looking at.

[T25UFO]

6 hours ago, rramesh said:

It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M.

Er . . . so where do you put the shutter?

All these silly rumours and pointless speculation.  I know for certain what is coming next: a SL3-S Reporter with a Monochrome sensor and no rear screen.

[IkarusJohn]

7 hours ago, rramesh said:

It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M.

Only if it has a global shutter 🤔

[lct]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

9 hours ago, rramesh said:

It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M.

How about register distance? Could a Q have the same register as M cameras with M lenses? It would need a thick adapter i suppose and M lens users have no reason to endure such unwanted accessory. Rather keep the simple idea of an M camera with the RF replaced by an EVF, as suggested since the beginning of the EVF-M project. The EVF-M could use the roller cam of M cameras for focus magnification this way.

Edited 21 hours ago by lct

[jaapv]

People forget that the Q is an integrated sensor-shutter-aperture-lens unit <a complete camera in essence> with a box with peripherals stuck on. 

[DreiPunkte]

... and ZACK BOOM BANG!!!!!
We have a real Retro Style Camera which was formaly known as Fuji EX1.
How cool!

[jdlaing]

3 hours ago, lct said:

How about register distance? Could a Q have the same register as M cameras with M lenses? It would need a thick adapter i suppose and M lens users have no reason to endure such unwanted accessory. Rather keep the simple idea of an M camera with the RF replaced by an EVF, as suggested since the beginning of the EVF-M project. The EVF-M could use the roller cam of M cameras for focus magnification this way.

No.

[DadDadDaddyo]

Maybe you take the lens cap off and then put it back on, real fast...

[JNK100]

12 hours ago, rramesh said:

It probably makes more sense to have a M mount on a Q than to put an EVF on an M.

Perhaps but impossible.

Edited 17 hours ago by JNK100

[nussbusch]

vor 6 Stunden schrieb pgk:

Obvious solution is to leave off both rear screen and fit no viefinder at all (might also have to leave off the hotsoe to remove temptation to fit an external OVF) and market the camera as being utterly purist with no distractions. Imagine the tantalising wait before downloading cards onto a computer to see if you have anything remotely worth looking at.

And one could allow download of the files after a wait of one week to reduce the pace.

[jaapv]

4 hours ago, lct said:

How about register distance? Could a Q have the same register as M cameras with M lenses? It would need a thick adapter i suppose and M lens users have no reason to endure such unwanted accessory. Rather keep the simple idea of an M camera with the RF replaced by an EVF, as suggested since the beginning of the EVF-M project. The EVF-M could use the roller cam of M cameras for focus magnification this way.

I’m sure that far more users would want the adapter if the price were tripled. 

[SrMi]

2 hours ago, DadDadDaddyo said:

Maybe you take the lens cap off and then put it back on, real fast...

Electronic shutter is a better solution, even with its rolling shutter effect.

[FrozenInTime]

21 minutes ago, SrMi said:

Electronic shutter is a better solution, even with its rolling shutter effect.

Lartigue famously thought so with his 1912 racing car.

I'm not so sure; even trolleybuses look speedy.  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

GXR-M-module electronic shutter mode ( camera inverted to get the read-out tilting to the right ).

[SrMi]

8 hours ago, IkarusJohn said:

Only if it has a global shutter 🤔

A stacked sensor is sufficient. It exhibits the same rolling shutter effect as the mechanical shutter.

Edited 14 hours ago by SrMi

[FrozenInTime]

4 minutes ago, SrMi said:

A stacked sensor is sufficient. It exhibits the same rolling shutter effect as the mechanical shutter.

Indeed.

The shutterless Nikon ZR is generating far more positive comments than other shutterless attempts at M sized full frame camera such as the Sigma Fp and Lumix S9.

It uses a semi-stacked 24 Mpixel sensor, and has IBIS; though lacks an EVF.  Z6II is the more stills friendly EVF offering. The question needs to asked why the SL3-S not hold out for this sensor or the larger also semi-stacker S1II sensor.

[jaapv]

Nikon has been buying sensors from Sony.  But there are many requirements to be met for a design choice.  

[Advertisement]

Hallo,

Look here: Interesting Leica gear

[IkarusJohn]

1 hour ago, SrMi said:

A stacked sensor is sufficient. It exhibits the same rolling shutter effect as the mechanical shutter.

My comment was a joke - rolling shutter would kill the camera at birth …