Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

12 minutes ago, lct said:

My code reader seems to work perfectly so far. How could it be a hardware issue then?

Hardware issue means that some (or most) work fine but some have defaults, maybe the tolerance is a little bit off during production. Yours working well doesn't mean there isn't any potential hardware issue.

12 minutes ago, lct said:

Fact is some of us believe in speculations or hypotheses here but in all honesty, nobody knows for certain what cause(s) the freezes come from. 

Do you even know what a speculation or hypothesis mean? We don't "believe" in them, it's just our best guess based on our tests and observations. Of course, if new evidence came to light, we might have to abandon that hypothesis. That's how the scientific method works.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

My reading of the small amount of entrails that have been exposed in these very complex cameras is that the M11/Maestro3 firmware has come from a team very close to Leica while the SL2/Maestro3 seems to be still very Panasonic-influenced.  Does anyone know if the Q3/Maestro4 combo is largely MadeInGermany or has strong Panasonic origins that will keep its evolution more separate? (Q's are nice, but with an M11, I don't need one.)

Leica has come a long way from the M8 days when RealLeicaEngineers did optics and mechanical engineering, fancy external appearances came from artsy design shops in Munich, and software was contracted out.  I hope to see the day when they can claim a common code base and a unified user interface in some future decade.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, lct said:

Zero statements from Leica and nobody knows for certain if it is a software problem or not. As much as i like my freeze-free M11, i would not order a second body, if i needed it, as long as Leica does not communicate about the issue. 

At this stage I don't think they're going to make any statements on the basis that for the moment it's difficult to see what they'd have to talk about given that only a tiny number of people it would appear are in category 3 that I referred to above i.e. multiple freezes and on their 2nd or 3rd camera. For those people of course it's extremely frustrating but the majority are in groups 1 & 2 i.e. either no freezes or a few since purchase and therefore nothing to see really, especially since 1.6.

Contrast that to the situation with the new M6 whereby Leica quickly acknowledge there was an issue with the pressure plates scratching film in a batch of camera's early on. I had such a camera and Leica resolved the matter very quickly and to my satisfaction through their UK team.

At the moment it seems it's difficult for Leica to be able to replicate the issue that a tiny number of M11 users appear to be having as it really doesn't make sense that with multiple batches and different purchase dates, some users have had to swap their camera's a number of times. Rather than faulty hardware it seems like this is a software/firmware issue with very specific use cases, lenses, cards etc etc and combinations thereof. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SJH said:

At this stage I don't think they're going to make any statements on the basis that for the moment it's difficult to see what they'd have to talk about given that only a tiny number of people it would appear are in category 3 that I referred to above i.e. multiple freezes and on their 2nd or 3rd camera. For those people of course it's extremely frustrating but the majority are in groups 1 & 2 i.e. either no freezes or a few since purchase and therefore nothing to see really, especially since 1.6.

This tiny number theory does not sound incredible but, for lack of evidence, it looks like another speculation or hypothesis with no disrespect. I pertain to your group 2 but i would not order a second body as long as Leica does not communicate, as suggested.

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

4 hours ago, lct said:

This tiny number theory does not sound incredible but, for lack of evidence, it looks like another speculation or hypothesis with no disrespect. I pertain to your group 2 but i would not order a second body as long as Leica does not communicate, as suggested.

Of course I get your point but as I mentioned it is speculation based upon anecdotal evidence. however, I would suggest that if you’re in group 2 then that’s just like any other camera launched in recent times and there is a reasonable probability that applies to group 3: it’s just we’re a very fussy lot as Leica owners :) 

It would be interesting to go back over this entire thread and determine how many people are actually in group 3 v M11 units sold - 10, 20, 50, 100? Even the higher figure wouldn’t represent a material percentage of M11’s sold globally most likely. This differs considerably to when Leica knew (and disclosed) that an entire batch of 2022 M6’s had faulty pressure plates for example. 

Edited by SJH
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2023 at 2:54 AM, maidenfan84 said:

I was prepared to put down the money for a new M11. And this is exactly why I didn’t. It’s safer to buy a used older Leica than a new Leica. That’s really sad to say, but it seems to be truer and truer as the days pass. A magic fix for an SD card, or pulling the battery to ‘solve’ a freeze…these are things that shouldn’t even be happening on a $9000 USD camera, let alone a $900 USD camera (or any new camera, for that matter). Sure, Leica is legendary. But that doesn’t mean to me they get continuous free passes to keep selling high end camera equipment while ignoring issues. Maybe if they release an M12 where they actually address the issues, I’ll consider buying a new Leica. But at this time, not even a chance. Another reason that pushed me to not buy a new one is the response I get when I ask Leica Store staff and other influencers about the issues. They act like there’s zero issues at all. For example, i watched an M11 broadcast from a well known Leica store. I asked a direct question during the live chat about these freezing issues, etc and guess what…they completely took ALL questions about the camera…but mine. I was the only question they tiptoed around and ignored. I asked a second time…same thing happened again. Says a lot to me when these ‘reputable’ shops and staff won’t even acknowledge these widespread issues just so they can sell a flawed product to those who don’t know otherwise. 

I can put my money on that broadcast being Leica Miami... I sadly have nothing nice to say about them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SJH said:

It would be interesting to go back over this entire thread and determine how many people are actually in group 3 v M11 units sold - 10, 20, 50, 100? Even the higher figure wouldn’t represent a material percentage of M11’s sold globally most likely. This differs considerably to when Leica knew (and disclosed) that an entire batch of 2022 M6’s had faulty pressure plates for example.

I have no idea. It is up to Leica to disclose what they know, not to us to speculate on matters we have no clue about. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'm on my second M11, first one dated on the box Nov 2022, froze once while charging and trying to turn it on quickly, pulled the battery and then never again. Sold it eventually for personal reasons and just got a new M11 last week dated April 2023. Put about 100 frames and nothing, today I went for a photo walk and after taking a photo, I tried reviewing it and the photo was completely black, all the info and icons were there as they should but photo was pitch black. I thought I bumped the aperture ring or something, but realized camera became unresponsive, pulled the battery out, turned it on, hit play again and the photo showed as it should along all the other info on the screen.

Freaked me out a bit but kept going, I happen to stumble upon the courthouse that Trump was supposed to show up at, bunch of people so I went to town with it, shot about 200 frames (I treat my digital cameras like film, I am not trigger happy so that's quite a high amount for my style of shooting) camera got pretty warm as the sun was blazing, but did not have any issues, I turned it off a few times in between to rest and so on but kept up just fine.

Always used 32gb (gold) Lexar cards with both M11, as well as CV glass.

Here is the shots from todays shenanigans.

https://www.daeraso.com/site/trump-arrest/trump-arrest

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2023 at 6:42 AM, scott kirkpatrick said:

My reading of the small amount of entrails that have been exposed in these very complex cameras is that the M11/Maestro3 firmware has come from a team very close to Leica while the SL2/Maestro3 seems to be still very Panasonic-influenced.  Does anyone know if the Q3/Maestro4 combo is largely MadeInGermany or has strong Panasonic origins that will keep its evolution more separate? (Q's are nice, but with an M11, I don't need one.)

Leica has come a long way from the M8 days when RealLeicaEngineers did optics and mechanical engineering, fancy external appearances came from artsy design shops in Munich, and software was contracted out.  I hope to see the day when they can claim a common code base and a unified user interface in some future decade.

 

Leica's Maestro comes from SOCIONEXT, a collaboration of Leica and Fujitsu Semiconductor.

 

https://leica-camera.com/en-AU/Company/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/Press-Releases-2016/Press-Release-Leica-Camera-AG-and-Socionext-Europe-continue-their-long-standing-collaboration-with-a-focus-on-next-generation-System-on-Chip-SoC-solutions

 

https://www.eu.socionext.com/nextnews/leica-camera-ag-and-socionext-europe-continue-their-long-standing-collaboration.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dugby said:

I read that differently, that Socionext is a successor to Fujitsu Semiconductor. It looks like it is jointly owned by Fujitsu, Panasonic and a bank.

Leica collaborated with Socionext to develop the Maestro II. I believe Leica is the only brand using that name for its processors, but who knows where else it is used under a different name. As that press release dates from 2016, we could guess that Socionext also produced the Maestro III for Leica. It remains an open question whether the Maestro IV is from the same source - though I have no reason to think otherwise.

 

Edited by LocalHero1953
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for fun, I ran some quick searches on Google, and I invite folks to do the same. 

Do this especially if you feel that any issues related to freezing up are more prevalent, or even unique, to Leica cameras. 

Try these as searches (no need to include the quotation marks):

"Canon camera freezes"

"Nikon camera freezes"

"Olympus camera freezes"

"Fujifilm camera freezes"

"Hasselblad camera freezes"

Do this, and you may detect a pattern.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DadDadDaddyo said:

Just for fun, I ran some quick searches on Google, and I invite folks to do the same. 

Do this especially if you feel that any issues related to freezing up are more prevalent, or even unique, to Leica cameras. 

Try these as searches (no need to include the quotation marks):

"Canon camera freezes"

"Nikon camera freezes"

"Olympus camera freezes"

"Fujifilm camera freezes"

"Hasselblad camera freezes"

Do this, and you may detect a pattern.....

Never had a digital Nikon freeze. Never had a freeze with the X100F, X100V, GFX 50S/50R/100S. The only camera besides Leica I've had freeze was the early copies of the Canon R5 – and guess, what? Those were hardware failures that required a mainboard replacement. So let's not make assumptions based on patterns that only exist in our own heads.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I can understand the frustration some M11 owners have if their camera (or second) freezes on a regular basis, however, all the wailing about “Leica must come clean’ or ‘they must make a statement’ isn’t likely to happen at the moment. We’ll never know the likely numbers but like just about every other brand they have a tiny minority with multiple freezes on a regular basis. They’ve said that some owners do experience freezes and they’ve outlined that in the v1.6 release notes.

When something like the M6 pressure plate issue happens (like other manufactures) they acknowledge the issue and put forward a resolution. From this thread it appears the actual number of people with multiple freezes is tiny in reality and most owners are either freeze free or had just a couple of freezes since they bought the camera. Leica will know this to and have a reasonable idea as to how many camera’s it relates.

The guy on YouTube who claims to be on his 3 or 4th (?) camera seems really weird to me, bought at different times/ batches etc and still the issue occurs for him when most buyers don’t experience any freezes/or just a few - it has to be how he uses the camera. An M11 is now a sophisticated computer/software platform, like all tech it will freeze now and then just like everyone other item of tech, an M11 is not an M3 or M6.

People might say ‘well I’ve never had a freeze with my Fuji XT4 but it happens with my M11’, clearly that statement for them is true but  again many owners of the XT line for example do have freezes (I had an XT3 at launch and it froze on 2 or 3 occasions on firmware v1).

If an entire batch of M11’s made say between January and March had faulty hardware etc then Leica would have to make a statement, the fact that they are silent on the matter indicates they feel they’re in the same camp at the moment as every other manufacture of camera’s/tech so ‘nothing to see’.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SJH said:

[...] like just about every other brand they have a tiny minority with multiple freezes on a regular basis. [...] the fact that they are silent on the matter indicates they feel they’re in the same camp at the moment as every other manufacture of camera’s/tech so ‘nothing to see’.

Leica's working on a firmware update, as i understand it, which would contradict both faulty hardware and "nothing to see" theories IMHO.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, lct said:

Leica's working on a firmware update, as i understand it, which would contradict both faulty hardware and "nothing to see" theories IMHO.

That’s my understand to but in my view this is further bug fixing and a step on from 1.6. We’ll probably have to agree to disagree on this :) but this to me is the same as everyone else in the market. Some people believe that this a on a par with the M9 sensor issue or most recently say the M6 pressure plate scratching film, personally I think Leica are now homing in on providing 1.7 to try and deal with the tiny tiny minority still experiencing multi freezes.

Really this is what most tech companies do, so I don’t believe that Leica are being evasive it’s just normal BAU with a new camera just like the other makes. As such my ‘nothing in to see’ comment means just that - Leica don’t think there is a point in making a statement about normal BAU firmware development as it’s not actual affecting many camera’s in a material way. If every second camera for example was being returned to Leica they’d have to make statement rather obviously..

Don’t get me wrong I was pretty hacked off about my new M6 on release scratching film but to Leica’s credit they acknowledged this snd dealt with it instantly. Equally I had a Q2 that showed the incorrect f stop in the viewfinder compared to the lens setting, they acknowledge that fault and replaced it instantly.

We’ll again probably see in the 1.7 release notes the comment from Leica that ‘further fixes for some camera’s experiencing freezes’. Many other camera companies are less up front about that and just state ‘further bug fixes’.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SJH said:

As such my ‘nothing in to see’ comment means just that - Leica don’t think there is a point in making a statement about normal BAU firmware development as it’s not actual affecting many camera’s in a material way.

Excuse the selective quote, but do you actually know that it’s only affecting a “tiny tiny minority still experiencing multi freezes”.  This isn’t a banana; it’s an extremely expensive camera.

The converse is more compelling - Leica has form.  I know I keep banging on about this, but successive Leica products have been recalled due to quality issues (the 35 Summilux (FLE) and 50 APO spring to mind), and Leica tried to deny the corrosion issue with the M9 long after it became obvious that the sensor cover glass was faulty. Exactly the same point about only a few cameras being susceptible to corrosion - ultimately, Leica had to offer free replacement for ever affected camera after pressure here on this forum.  The only Leica camera release I can think of that was trouble free was the SL. And mine bricked  

Now, I don’t disagree that this may be a strange flaw in the software, where a combination of settings results in a freeze or even the camera bricking. We've seen such flaws in many releases of computer operating systems. Hopefully Leica will sort the problem. But, we’re not talking a Windows or Apple operating system here. It’s a camera taking still images. 

My view?  The M11 takes an enormous leap technologically from the M10, and a lot of it was ill-conceived. There’s a lot going on in that camera that Leica wasn’t doing before, and it clearly hasn’t been properly thought through.
 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone describe the difference between when a camera freezes and when a camera bricks?

Is it that the freeze is reversible/recoverable, but the brick is not?

I want to understand the local dialect and use it correctly. 

The trouble is, there is sometimes nomenclature that masquerades as a precise form of speech, recognized by the tribe, but which seems, upon examination, to stem more from the realm of impressions and feelings than engineering and technology.

Often, it is language used so frequently by so many that we only assume we each mean the same thing as each other. We seem to use it because it carries a kind of tribal imprimatur, a "weight", a certain heft.

Like "Rendering."

"Rendering" as a noun, or "Render" as a verb, that is, at least in conversations not having to do with the process of extracting fat from meat. 

I found myself writing, "After taking pictures of the wall I changed lenses without powering down the camera and it bricked. I changed lenses because I didn't like how the first lens rendered the bricks. But I pulled the battery to unbrick it. I'll print the results so you can render your own judgement," but fortunately my inner editor was able to catch it in time. 

I'll start the ball rolling. I hereby pledge not to say "...how this lens/sensor/model renders," for a long, long time, but instead to say, "...how pictures from this lens/sensor/model come out."

At least until Hell bricks....

Edited by DadDadDaddyo
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DadDadDaddyo said:

Can someone describe the difference between when a camera freezes and when a camera bricks?

Is it that the freeze is reversible/recoverable, but the brick is not?

I want to understand the local dialect and use it correctly. 

The trouble is, there is sometimes nomenclature that masquerades as a precise form of speech, recognized by the tribe, but which seems, upon examination, to stem more from the realm of impressions and feelings than engineering and technology.

Often, it is language used so frequently by so many that we only assume we each mean the same thing as each other. We seem to use it because it carries a kind of tribal imprimatur, a "weight", a certain heft.

Like "Rendering."

"Rendering" as a noun, or "Render" as a verb, that is, at least in conversations not having to do with the process of extracting fat from meat. 

I found myself writing, "After taking pictures of the wall I changed lenses without powering down the camera and it bricked. I changed lenses because I didn't like how the first lens rendered the bricks. But I pulled the battery to unbrick it. I'll print the results so you can render your own judgement," but fortunately my inner editor was able to catch it in time. 

I'll start the ball rolling. I hereby pledge not to say "...how this lens/sensor/model renders," for a long, long time, but instead to say, "...how pictures from this lens/sensor/model come out."

At least until Hell bricks....

Bricked usually when referred to camera being dead or not going back to working state and freezes when a single turn off or may be a battery pop out will  life back

well at least that’s the term usually used with electronic devices

Edited by jakontil
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...