Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

vor 3 Stunden schrieb Robert Blanko:

IMHO, the 40 MP sensor of the M10-R seems to be the sweet spot for combining pixel clarity, high iso capabilities and resolution whereas 60 MP would be an overkill for me.

I can understand you. But to be sincere: There is nothing like a sweet spot. More pixels give you always a better resolution. You remember that some 10 years ago we found that 18 MPix was the unhealthy result of the pixel race. 12 was the sweet spot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

x
vor 2 Stunden schrieb M11 for me:

I can understand you. But to be sincere: There is nothing like a sweet spot. More pixels give you always a better resolution. You remember that some 10 years ago we found that 18 MPix was the unhealthy result of the pixel race. 12 was the sweet spot.

Yes, and normally 18 or 24 Mp is still enough today. Unless you print very large formats or love pixel peeping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 2 Stunden schrieb M11 for me:

I can understand you. But to be sincere: There is nothing like a sweet spot. More pixels give you always a better resolution. You remember that some 10 years ago we found that 18 MPix was the unhealthy result of the pixel race. 12 was the sweet spot.

But sensors with smaller pixels are prone to deliver less clarity (or whatever you may call the effect that a 100% crop exhibits noise, sometimes even at lower ISO), even though current sensors are quite good in said respect. 

Edited by Robert Blanko
Typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, M Street Photographer said:

Yes, and normally 18 or 24 Mp is still enough today. Unless you print very large formats or love pixel peeping.

I have made exhibit quality prints at 24x36 inch size with files from my M-P 240.   The M11 has 2.5 times the resolution of the M-P 240, so 60x90 inch prints would be doable.

I'm not sure where I'd hang 5x7.5 foot size prints, though.  As I have told my wife, we're going to have to get a bigger house.  😳

Edited by Herr Barnack
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

30 minutes ago, Artin said:

no doubt that the M10R BP is very striking and beautiful, however the Fact that a used M10R BP are fetching the same or in some cases even more then the M11 is just plain price Gouge , I hope Leica would release the M11 soon to the market and put everything back in its place 

When I purchased mine the m11 had just started becoming available, it was about $700 less but I've not seen another since at that price.  I considered myself very lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 11 Stunden schrieb Robert Blanko:

But sensors with smaller pixels are prone to deliver less clarity (or whatever you may call the effect that a 100% crop exhibits noise, sometimes even at lower ISO), even though current sensors are quite good in said respect. 

Try to look at things at the same size (in cm or inches) and not at 100%. That is a significant difference. Then you will see that the more pixels do not produce more noise. Just more resolution. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Robert Blanko said:

I decided to skip the M11 and to replace my M10 with an M10-R BP. Thus, my black chrome M10-R has a BP sibling and I will sell my M10.

Maybe the M12 will provide a more convincing update… 😉

The main reason why I did not go for an M11:

I was always happy with my M10-R.

IMHO, the 40 MP sensor of the M10-R seems to be the sweet spot for combining pixel clarity, high iso capabilities and resolution whereas 60 MP would be an overkill for me.

Another minor point is the simplicity of the shutter - and the shutter noise.

And on top, the BP looks great. Even better than expected. 🙂

I have been wondering if i should really let go off my M11, since it is my digital back up to M10r BP 😂

at first i thought the other way round but lately been using more and more of the BP instead

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 18 Stunden schrieb jakontil:

I have been wondering if i should really let go off my M11, since it is my digital back up to M10r BP 😂

at first i thought the other way round but lately been using more and more of the BP instead

 

I got a second hand M10 Monochrom as my back-up to go with my m10-R BP.
Same UI and batteries. 
When the M11 Mono reaches the market, prices for the M10M might go down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, satijntje said:

I got a second hand M10 Monochrom as my back-up to go with my m10-R BP.
Same UI and batteries. 
When the M11 Mono reaches the market, prices for the M10M might go down.

Yeah im losing some sleeps, really trying to love the M11 over my blackpaint.. thinking i should sell it while the price still okey and trade for another film camera

and probably come back some time in the future be it another special edition or whatever… 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have an M10 and walked into a Leica store today here in Germany ready to pull the trigger on an M11. 
 

Asked for the price of an M10-R on a whim and they just got one in the day before. Unused but sold before (person had to bring it back for money reasons after a day or two). After consideration I picked up the M10-R for 5K including warranty. 
 

Not an M11 but I can do a lot with 3k+ in the bank and even should be able to cover most of my expense selling the M10 or might add a lens now. Was too good of a deal. 

My M6 + the M10-R is all the Leica I will ever need. 
 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actual price was 5400 Euros but still A LOT of saved cash. They did not even get to check the shutter count yet because the camera was out and back in the store within the same week it first sold and they only had it for a couple of hours before I walked in. It wasn't officially up for sale yet and they just got it out because I asked for it. It's the shop I always go to and my 3rd Leica I bought there so I don't think anything funny is going on. Camera is in MINT condition. Original sticker on the LCD still attached with no bubbles underneath so it was never removed I think. 

Feels just like my M10 with more resolution. I am happy and like I said, the 3k+ can be spent on other things since I don't believe spending it on the M11 would get me better pictures if we are honest.... Now if money was of no concern at all, sure I'd like an M11 :)

 

 

Edited by 9ine
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that a camera with slow live view and producing red edge with some legacy lenses can still be sold for almost the same price as the M11. The M10-R must have other merits i guess but i have no experience with it TBH. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lct said:

Interesting that a camera with slow live view and producing red edge with some legacy lenses can still be sold for almost the same price as the M11. The M10-R must have other merits i guess but i have no experience with it TBH. 

It’s the best IMO. I’ve never heard or experienced red edge pictures with the M10R. 

Slow live view? 😅 M11 has slow start up. I would rather slow live view that I never use than slow start up. 

5 hours ago, Artin said:

Are  you telling me that if you were offered an M11 for say 9,000 Dollars  and an M10R for 8500  you would pick the M10R ? 

i would

Edited by Chimichurri
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...