Daniel Schutte Posted January 20, 2022 Share #1  Posted January 20, 2022 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm not sure whether I've had bad luck with getting lenses to fit on cameras, or if this is a common problem with the M system. My first Leica combo was an M3 SS with Summicron 50 V2. Since the body and lens shipped together, there was no problem getting them to mount. Next, I purchased an Ultron 28 f2. The lens fit into the mount, but I couldn't get it to click into place. Took it to a repair shop, and the owner basically got the lens to fit through brute force - said Voigtlander QC wasn't great and that this was basically to be expected. I used the lens like this for a couple of months, but it would often "unclick" itself somehow, so I eventually traded it for a LTM Skopar 28mm. Same thing happened with the first adapter - couldn't get it it to click in place. Went back to the shop, and was given a replacement that 'magically' worked without problems. Recently, I traded the M3 for an M4-P and, lo and behold, neither the adapted Voigtlander nor Summicron will even fit into the mount, let alone click. Thus out of 6 total Lens/body combos (2 bodies and 4 lenses/adapters), 4 have been faulty. I'd simply put it down to a service error or wear and tear, but the fact that this has occurred between unrelated lenses and bodies makes me skeptical. Has anyone had a similar experience? Am I doing something wrong?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 20, 2022 Posted January 20, 2022 Hi Daniel Schutte, Take a look here Are Leica M mounts usually this problematic?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
SiggiGun Posted January 20, 2022 Share #2  Posted January 20, 2022 With Leica M and Zeiss Lenses, I nevee had any issue  1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.noctilux Posted January 20, 2022 Share #3  Posted January 20, 2022 Hello Daniel, Welcome here, I don't know the right answer, just some observations and questions, please answer or try : - Did M3 and Summicron mount/unmount well ? - had you tried your lenses which did not mount on another Leica M body knowing not to have trouble with any lens ? - what is the brand of the LTM to M adapter ? - if not Leitz/Leica/Voigtlander adapter, or this can be bent in the past Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenInTime Posted January 20, 2022 Share #4 Â Posted January 20, 2022 I once had issues with some lenses clicking in on a M2 ; the solution was to slacken off the mount screws on the body - a slight rotation and tighten and it worked for all lenses. I suspect older cameras that have seen services might want the same adjustment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted January 20, 2022 Share #5 Â Posted January 20, 2022 Your experience is unsatisfactory. Leica lenses should fit any Leica body, unless there has been maltreatment at some time in the past. Non-Leica lenses with M-mount should offer a similar experience. Adapters might present a problem if they are non-Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Schutte Posted January 20, 2022 Author Share #6 Â Posted January 20, 2022 The Summicron and M3 mounted perfectly. No, I haven't tried any of the lenses with bodies other than the mentioned M3 and M4-P - perhaps I just got unlucky with 2 crummy mounts... The LTM adapter is Fotodiox - seem pretty reputable but obviously no Leica or Voigtlander.... The M4-P was apparently serviced and repainted prior to my purchase - the paint job seems pretty sketchy though and the gutta percha is already peeling, so I'm not sure I trust whoever performed the CLA... good thing there is an unconditional return policy - might try to pick the same camera up locally instead so that I can test it before purchasing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Schutte Posted January 20, 2022 Author Share #7 Â Posted January 20, 2022 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am noticing that something in the mount appears to be bent - could this be what is causing the problem? IMG_1583.HEIC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 20, 2022 Share #8 Â Posted January 20, 2022 Faulty camera mount apparently. I had an M3 DS like that in the past. I would return the camera. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danner Posted January 20, 2022 Share #9 Â Posted January 20, 2022 My experience, after owning three M6 bodies and about 11-12 Leica lenses, never had any lens mount issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted January 20, 2022 Share #10 Â Posted January 20, 2022 5 hours ago, Daniel Schutte said: ...Took it to a repair shop, and the owner basically got the lens to fit through brute force - said Voigtlander QC wasn't great and that this was basically to be expected... I trust you made a mental note to never use that guy again? Utter nonsense. Philip. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Schutte Posted January 20, 2022 Author Share #11 Â Posted January 20, 2022 4 minutes ago, pippy said: I trust you made a mental note to never use that guy again? Utter nonsense. Philip. It was only my second M mount lens at the time, so I kind of took his word for it. In hindsight I realise what a ridiculous thing that is for a technician to say. The funny thing is that we're talking about one of the most highly regarded repair shops in HK... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.noctilux Posted January 20, 2022 Share #12 Â Posted January 20, 2022 2 hours ago, Daniel Schutte said: The Summicron and M3 mounted perfectly. No, I haven't tried any of the lenses with bodies other than the mentioned M3 and M4-P - perhaps I just got unlucky with 2 crummy mounts... The LTM adapter is Fotodiox - seem pretty reputable but obviously no Leica or Voigtlander.... The M4-P was apparently serviced and repainted prior to my purchase - the paint job seems pretty sketchy though and the gutta percha is already peeling, so I'm not sure I trust whoever performed the CLA... good thing there is an unconditional return policy - might try to pick the same camera up locally instead so that I can test it before purchasing. Fotodiox adapter can be good enough, I do use some Fotodiox adapters from SLR mounts (Nikon, Contax, Olympus) to M mount. But not as nicely made as simple Leitz/Leica in brass and 1.00mm thick LTM-M. Â So returning the M4-P is right choice. You will find another, one of 22k units made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBestSLIsALeicaflex Posted January 24, 2022 Share #13 Â Posted January 24, 2022 I've owned a number of recent Voightlander M-mount lenses (34/1.4 II, 35/2 Asph, 40/1.4), and didn't have any issues mounting them on the four M2's in my possession. Â In fact, in my experience the build quality of current Voigtlanders exceeds some of the Leica lenses I purchased "new" from the 95-05 time frame. Â I know nothing about the current lineup of Leica lenses but the only three lenses I've broke in the field have been Leica -- ironically two separate 60mm Elmarits and a 35mm Summicron Asph. Â In fixing the aspherical lens, the well know repair tech commented that modern Leica lenses are not as well made because they have lots of plastic inside. Â I don't know if that was hyperbole, and I've heard problematic stories about Voigtlander sand Zeiss ZM too. Â Just my experience, but I have been relatively impressed with those Voigtlanders. Â Just have the 35 Nokton now, and yes they should mount easily. Â If not, something is either wrong with the lens or camera (or possibly both). Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now