Jump to content

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, rivi1969 said:

Zeiss ZM are excellent, but check the Voigtlander vintage line, those lenses are stunning.ย 

I am curious, what's the point of buying an M body (besideย using telephotos, macros etc)ย to use it with an electronic VF, wouldn't be better an SL body or the Q instead?

That's a very good point, I thought it may help with the transition but I am learning that may not be the case๐Ÿ™„

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Raid Amin said:

ย 

"what's the point of buying an M body" ... if you use lenses that are not made by Leica?

I used to have the same opinion, but I'd heard such good things about the Zeiss range of ZM lenses that I decided to try one. For years I have used the 35mm Summicron f2 ASPH (and still do), however, I thought I would like something a little faster and after much thought decided to buy the Zeiss 35mm F1.4. In my opinion that lens is as good as the Summicron, even wide open it's sharp from corner to corner.

I was so impressed, that I have since bought the Zeiss f2 50mm so that I can leave a 50 on my M10 and on my Monochrom, instead of having to switch lenses. The Zeiss lenses have different characteristics which from an artistic point of view is great.

I agree in that 95% I focus using the rangefinder but I do find the Visoflex handy for low perspective shots and for fine focusing my Noctilux 0.95 when used fully open.

Best regards

https://photographybytomlane.com

Link to post
Share on other sites

ย 

18 hours ago, Raid Amin said:

I use the RF in my cameras. I try to mainly use Leica lenses.ย 

"what's the point of buying an M body" ... if you use lenses that are not made by Leica?

There are superb lenses from Zeiss and Voigtlander that might be even better than manyย Leica's, (I am leaving 7Artisans outside) especially the latest versions of the super fast CV's and their Vintage line are amazing, so why not?ย 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few points. The VF helps immensely when focusing on the 40MP sensor. Some people think the sensor outperforms their lenses. No but it will outperform the ability of many folks using the rangefinder. It also helps to get a sense for the exposure through the lens at stopped-down aperture. You will also likelyย find it much easier to go back and forth between RF and VF than RF and rearย screen. Finally the other models you cited do not have the same performance as the M10-R with M glass, especially at the wider angles.

But back to the thread topic, still waiting for the M-10Rย over here!

Edited by intermediatic
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Congrats! If youโ€™re looking for a small, sharp lens that doesnโ€™t break the bank, you canโ€™t go wrong with the Zeiss Biogon 2.8. I have been using it with my M240 mostly for street/everyday photography and absolutely love it. Heard good things about the 35mm elmarit and voigtlander as well but never used them.ย 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, rivi1969 said:

ย 

There are superb lenses from Zeiss and Voigtlander that might be even better than manyย Leica's, (I am leaving 7Artisans outside) especially the latest versions of the super fast CV's and their Vintage line are amazing, so why not?ย 

I know this fact. My comment was meant to bring this out. I own Zeiss and CV lenses too. I would not say they are "better", but "different".

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, sanadsaad said:

Congrats! If youโ€™re looking for a small, sharp lens that doesnโ€™t break the bank, you canโ€™t go wrong with the Zeiss Biogon 2.8. I have been using it with my M240 mostly for street/everyday photography and absolutely love it. Heard good things about the 35mm elmarit and voigtlander as well but never used them.ย 

The Zeiss 35mm/2 is also a excellent lens.ย 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, lanetomlane said:

I used to have the same opinion, but I'd heard such good things about the Zeiss range of ZM lenses that I decided to try one. For years I have used the 35mm Summicron f2 ASPH (and still do), however, I thought I would like something a little faster and after much thought decided to buy the Zeiss 35mm F1.4. In my opinion that lens is as good as the Summicron, even wide open it's sharp from corner to corner.

I was so impressed, that I have since bought the Zeiss f2 50mm so that I can leave a 50 on my M10 and on my Monochrom, instead of having to switch lenses. The Zeiss lenses have different characteristics which from an artistic point of view is great.

I agree in that 95% I focus using the rangefinder but I do find the Visoflex handy for low perspective shots and for fine focusing my Noctilux 0.95 when used fully open.

Best regards

https://photographybytomlane.com

I view the availability of Zeiss and CV lenses in M mount as a very fortunate thing for M users.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Raid Amin said:

The Zeiss 35mm/2 is also a excellent lens.ย 

I have one and you are right, is very good. I wish it was a tad shorter, but the IQ is great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back to the topic at hand (availablity! maybe use other threads for lens questions?). I note that my Monochrom got to Bergen County Camera on the 21st of February, which indicates it'll be after mid-August before I see my M-10R, but who knows, anything is possible.ย 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing ย ย 0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...