Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

11 hours ago, Chaemono said:

How does it compare to the WATE in terms of optical performance?

Based on my own experience, on 24MP sensor, the performance of the 16-35 SL and the WATE are pretty close in the 16mm to 21mm focal range. But the SL zoom has better resolving power on 47MP sensor body.  The SL zoom is also a bit wider than the 16mm when you disable the lens profile correction. It is interesting to note that from Leica's MTFs, both lenses are optimized for better performance toward large/open f stops, a Leica lens design philosophy.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Chaemono said:

Sure, but in this case there are two 16-35 mm L-mount zooms.  Specifying which one is exactly meant shouldn’t be subject to debate, obviously. 

But you didn’t ask which one; you specifically asked IF he meant the L mount zoom. Obviously, yes, hence my comments, including MY post  that there were two.

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a great lens. I especially like that it doesn't extend and that it is weather sealed, in addition to it's stellar optical performance.

The 14-24 Sigma is also fabulous. I would assume the new Panasonic will be as well (I own a bunch of Panasonic lenses and they make very very good glass.)

So, in the space of 6 months we have gone from 1 camera  and a few lenses to 5 bodies and a choice between three excellent wide angle zooms.

It's a good time to be using L mount.

Gordon

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully appreciate that this is neither weather resistant nor a full sensor lens, but wondering where the TL 11-23 stacks up IQ wise. It is about a pound lighter than the Sigma. More importantly, I have one. 😀

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

It's a great lens. I especially like that it doesn't extend and that it is weather sealed, in addition to it's stellar optical performance.

The 14-24 Sigma is also fabulous. I would assume the new Panasonic will be as well (I own a bunch of Panasonic lenses and they make very very good glass.)

So, in the space of 6 months we have gone from 1 camera  and a few lenses to 5 bodies and a choice between three excellent wide angle zooms.

It's a good time to be using L mount.

Gordon

There are now 6 cameras.

The SL 16-35 is also my preferred wide angle zoom. But for astrophotography the Sigma f2 24-35 Art is even better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, caissa said:

  (Only a small problem with the way Leica activates BBF on SL and SL2).

The Panasonic clutch mechanism that switches between AF and MF on certain lenses (including the S 70-200 Pro) presents issues on the Leica bodies.  I considered the long zoom, but found a mint used SL 90-280 at a great price instead.

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...