Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Very interesting info and tech data really. I have a q2 and SL. Frankly speaking don't really see such a huge need for IBIS. Lens stab is more than enough to me.

Just hope image quality and low light performance will be good enough as per Leica standards :) so as to try my new 50 sl summicron.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Luca said:

Very interesting info and tech data really. I have a q2 and SL. Frankly speaking don't really see such a huge need for IBIS. Lens stab is more than enough to me.

Just hope image quality and low light performance will be good enough as per Leica standards :) so as to try my new 50 sl summicron.

1-2 stop (lens stabilisation) vs 5-ish stops (IBIS; based on S1R) is a huge difference. In many shooting conditions, for me. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

SL had state of the art EVF, beyond all others at the time, at least resolution-wise.   But still not yet my cup of tea. Will the SL2 achieve some new level?  The viewing/focusing system matters to me. And so does IBIS, if implemented well. Lens roadmap and control interface, too. We each have our preferences and priorities.  Lots of good choices these days.

Jeff

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jeff S said:

SL had state of the art EVF, beyond all others at the time, at least resolution-wise.   But still not yet my cup of tea. Will the SL2 achieve some new level?  The viewing/focusing system matters to me. And so does IBIS, if implemented well. Lens roadmap and control interface, too. We each have our preferences and priorities.  Lots of good choices these days.

Jeff

its probably got the new EVF that the S1r has

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jeff S said:

SL had state of the art EVF, beyond all others at the time, at least resolution-wise.   But still not yet my cup of tea. Will the SL2 achieve some new level?  The viewing/focusing system matters to me. And so does IBIS, if implemented well. Lens roadmap and control interface, too. We each have our preferences and priorities.  Lots of good choices these days.

Jeff

I understand Jeff’s concern. The only thing I really dislike about my SL is the performance of the EVF in high contrast/bright light situations where you need to raise exposure compensation to fully see the scene. I understand this is an issue with EVFs other than the SL’s. It would be nice if they’ve improved it.

The description of the SL2 here, though, sounds mighty appealing to me. Twice the megapixels, so bigger print possibilities, and greater ability to crop? IBIS, so better low light performance with those amazing, but slightly slow zooms? I have no idea whether it will sell as many copies as the Q2, but it sounds great to me.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 hours ago, bags27 said:

5 stops would definitely make me hold onto my credit card more tightly, but it might slip out. 😀

Only the insiders know the type and implementation of IBIS hidden in SL2, but given the collaboration with Panasonic, it might be similar to the S1R's IBIS. Some hand-held examples with the S1R (w/75 f2 and a biggie 400mm f2.8), with IBIS and electronic shutter activated:

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sigma fp price has been announced: $1899 / £1999 (where do they get their exchange rates from?).

Another price point for the SL2 to be calibrated against. Though Sigma has done what I hoped Leica will do: create something different, rather than something close to the S1

Edited by LocalHero1953
Link to post
Share on other sites

US prices are without tax, UK prices are VAT inc. 

 

Brexit drama adds uncertainty, therefore more exchange rate insurance fees.

fp is maybe classified as movie camera, hence additional tariffs

Edited by nicci78
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Luca said:

…..Frankly speaking don't really see such a huge need for IBIS…...

 

With 47mgpixel some sort of stabilization is really needed, no doubt about it. And not only at low shooting times. Or IBIS or tripod. Otherwise our fantastic leica lenses are waisted. Only exeption for the wide lenses (maybe)

Edited by giampo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nicci78 said:

US prices are without tax, UK prices are VAT inc. 

 

Brexit drama adds uncertainty, therefore more exchange rate insurance fees.

fp is maybe classified as movie camera, hence additional tariffs

That doesn't apply to other devices:

- Panasonic S1: $2497 / £2199

- Blackmagic Pocket Cinema 4K: $1295 / £1194

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, giampo said:

Or IBIS or tripod. Otherwise our fantastic leica lenses are waisted.

Don't forget that two of the zoom already have OIS, and IBIS only adds about a stop to that, at best.

As someone else previously explained, the stops added by IS are a maximum under very special circumstances. That's why they say "up to." Those five stops (or whatever the spec is) are at a specific shutter speed, focal length, and with a specific amount of camera shake at a specific frequency, in a specific direction. Most of the time you will get a lot less.

It's very photographer-dependent as well. I am lucky enough to be naturally steady, so IS doesn't help much. I remember shooting once in a dark recording studio. I was getting great shots, and then a fellow photographer borrowed my camera. His shots looked like earthquake footage. I had been shooting at 1/4 sec hand-held with a 24/2.8! IS wouldn't get me five extra stops in those circumstances (8 seconds?). Maybe one extra stop, but only if I caught the subject between breaths.

I'll take an extra stop of usable ISO over IS any day, although a Summilux would be nice too.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 2 Stunden schrieb giampo:

With 47mgpixel some sort of stabilization is really needed, no doubt about it. And not only at low shooting times. Or IBIS or tripod. Otherwise our fantastic leica lenses are waisted. Only exeption for the wide lenses (maybe)

Exactly - couldn‘t agree more, esp. regarding the (non stabilized) SL-Summicrons!

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BernardC said:

Don't forget that two of the zoom already have OIS, and IBIS only adds about a stop to that, at best.

As someone else previously explained, the stops added by IS are a maximum under very special circumstances. That's why they say "up to." Those five stops (or whatever the spec is) are at a specific shutter speed, focal length, and with a specific amount of camera shake at a specific frequency, in a specific direction. Most of the time you will get a lot less.

It's very photographer-dependent as well. I am lucky enough to be naturally steady, so IS doesn't help much. I remember shooting once in a dark recording studio. I was getting great shots, and then a fellow photographer borrowed my camera. His shots looked like earthquake footage. I had been shooting at 1/4 sec hand-held with a 24/2.8! IS wouldn't get me five extra stops in those circumstances (8 seconds?). Maybe one extra stop, but only if I caught the subject between breaths.

I'll take an extra stop of usable ISO over IS any day, although a Summilux would be nice too.

this is the point 3.5 stops is already a lot and would  cover most of cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Luca said:

this is the point 3.5 stops is already a lot and would  cover most of cases.

For two SL lenses, not the other six (so far, I think), nor any adapted lenses without OIS.

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...