Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, T25UFO said:

I think that bundle is with the SL 50 Summilux, not the new APO Summicron.

You are right, 6000 for the body only and 2000 for the lens ...   That’s why I expected the cheaper lens ...   my mistake ...

Edited by caissa
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 hours ago, Chaemono said:

Which puts you in a bind. Think of the APO 50 Summicron-SL as the APO 50 M which you’ve owned before just more perfect, and bigger with AF and weather sealing.

Yup... exactly what I'm thinking it will be. What are you doing 50 wise?? What do you have now, and what are you keeping?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit long on 50s - I won't be buying the 50 APO-Summicron-SL.  The 50 Summilux-SL is close to perfect, and when I don't want perfect, I have other choices ... If the 50 Summicron-SL is as good as the 75 Summicron-SL it might be a good choice instead of the Summilux, but not worth the switch, in my view, unless size is an issue for you.

Edited by IkarusJohn
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, IkarusJohn said:

I'm a bit long on 50s - I won't be buying the 50 APO-Summicron-SL.  The 50 Summilux-SL is close to perfect, and when I don't want perfect, I have other choices ... If the 50 Summicron-SL is as good as the 75 Summicron-SL it might be a good choice instead of the Summilux, but not worth the switch, in my view, unless size is an issue for you.

Totally agree... the 50 SL is so GREAT. If the APO is close in terms of background blur... the size and faster AF will have me switching.

I got lucky... someone had one, and decided to sell. Right place, right time.

Edited by Donzo98
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lucky chap!

I've come to the conclusion that much of the lens comparison is dancing on the head of a pin (see Chaemono's remarkable stamina for posting endless images which, to my eye, show very little unless you're really looking for it).  In the SL system, I have the three zooms (16-280mm) and two primes (50 Summilux & 75 Summicron) - I see myself adding a 28 Summicron, perhaps ... the 16-35 zoom is very good, and there is probably no justification for a wide prime.  I also have the TL2, with 11-23 zoom and 35 prime; Monochrom & M10-D with 21-28(2)-35-50(4)-75; and X1D II (to arrive shortly), 21/4 & 80/1.9.

There's no particular logic to this, save that the SL fills a very specific need - it's weatherproof, the zooms are fantastic, and the primes the best Leica makes.  Great for travel with a single zoom, tramping, birding and the sports I do. The M cameras are what they are - you get it, or you don't.  The TL2 is great for cycling and when I just want something small and the X1D II ... well, I'm not sure yet.  I regret selling my Hasselblad 500cx gear, and have always had a hankering to return to medium format.  I'm not attracted to squeezing more pixels into the 35mm format - I'm happy with 24MP to be honest.  For landscape, however, and some short tele work, the increase in size of the 50c sensor has benefits (apparently) over and above just pixel count - dynamic range, colour and other things I'm yet to explore.

Apart from the 21/4 (17mm full frame equivalent) and the 80/1.9 (64mm full frame equivalent), I might add a short tele like the 135 & 1.7 converter (102/178mm full frame equivalents), I don't see myself adding to this system.  There's a big gap in the middle if the XCD lenses which is well served by my M system.  Time will tell ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I own both lenses, but after testing out the cron, I'm selling the lux.
The foundamental reason is that the lux is too big, while I did not find it too heavy using it with the SL, it is just fine. Also because the cron is not a feather light lens anyway.
Other reasons are that for my photography f2 is enough and if I want less DOF I will just use the 90 SL, also I find out that for sharpness at infinity on planar subjects (landscape) the cron is better than the lux.
If your sbjects are mainly people, prefer f1.4 and are a bokeh addictid, you would prefer the lux I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...