Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It all fits well with Dr Kaufman's statement on the Lula-video regarding the potential of the L-mount: "This mount has lots more opportunities and you will see something next year...June 2018." substitute June with September, and viola!

Edited by helged
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It all fits well with Dr Kaufman's statement on the Lula-video regarding the potential of the L-mount: "This mount has lots more opportunities and you will see something next year...June 2018." substitute June with September, and viola!

No, I think he was talking about the watches.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

rumor has it that Sigma already makes the TL lenses. IF, if, if that's true, that's pretty impressive, given how sharp they are.

I've seen someone suggest that before.  Do you have a source? I searched a few days ago, but couldn't find any info about Sigma making anything for Leica.  The Sigma art line has a distinct reputation for corner to corner sharpness.  People that buy them swear by them.  However, there are reports that Sigma lenses lack micro-contrast.  I've never shot with one.

Edited by RomeoBravo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of those L O N G  Sigma lenses are not exactly state of the art.

 

dunk

 

Probably, never owned Sigma lens myself. I think later Art lens are better than older offerings.

On a side note there is solution to using quality long prime with AF, image stabilisation and mirrorless - Nikon Z6/7.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming any of this occurs, is it likely that optical performance of a Leica SL lens would be the same on one of the rumoured Panasonic bodies as it would be on an SL body? I’m trying to figure out how optimisation of the interplay of lens + sensor components could impact the output. Does the design of an SL lens likely allow them to be more readily interchangeable across sensors (compared to M lenses that need specific sensor microlenses)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lens performance across the brands should not be a problem, as the whole issue depends on the register distance of the lens, which dictates optical design. However, it would become interesting if different brands use different sensors for their cameras. We could be changing bodies like we used to change film ;)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming any of this occurs, is it likely that optical performance of a Leica SL lens would be the same on one of the rumoured Panasonic bodies as it would be on an SL body? I’m trying to figure out how optimisation of the interplay of lens + sensor components could impact the output. Does the design of an SL lens likely allow them to be more readily interchangeable across sensors (compared to M lenses that need specific sensor microlenses)?

 

HI There Jon

They should certainly perform as well, remember, Panasonic have had a long co-operation with Panasonic, and that probably extends to the SL. 

M lenses need specific sensors (more especially with thin coverglass) because of the angle of incidence of light on the sensor. No such problems with the SL/TL lenses

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Which lenses? Guessing R but far past suggests M?

 

Never heard of Sigma designing or building M lenses so far. As for R lenses, the R 28-70 (11265) was designed and built by Sigma i believe. It is the only one i know of but i may be wrong.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen someone suggest that before.  Do you have a source? I searched a few days ago, but couldn't find any info about Sigma making anything for Leica.  The Sigma art line has a distinct reputation for corner to corner sharpness.  People that buy them swear by them.  However, there are reports that Sigma lenses lack micro-contrast.  I've never shot with one.

 

 ...... ah ..... the mythical 'micro-contrast' ....... which appears to be a term solely used by photographers and refers to ordinary contrast sprinkled with fairy dust.  :rolleyes:

 

The few SIgma Arts I have used seem plenty contrasty enough for me. The 135/1.8 Art image quality is impressive ..... albeit a lump and weight of true SL lens proportions ........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lens performance across the brands should not be a problem, as the whole issue depends on the register distance of the lens, which dictates optical design. ;)

 

 

It also depends of course on the camera being able to make the correct internal digital corrections for distortion, vignetting, etc. As we all know, the resulting high image quality from S and L lenses results from a balance of optical design and in-camera digital correction. Presumably, the collaboration (partnership or whatever it is) will involve the sharing of this data so that an SL lens can be used on a Pansonic body without loss of quality.

Edited by wattsy
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...