Raid Amin Posted February 12, 2018 Share #81 Â Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) I met Peter Karbe in Wetzlar and he said, more than once, that all modern Leica lenses are designed to be used wide open without any reduced image quality. Â Ernst Yes, he said this. I recall it well. It was nice meeting you, Ernst! Edited February 12, 2018 by Raid Amin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 12, 2018 Posted February 12, 2018 Hi Raid Amin, Take a look here Shooting Wide Open. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Ernstk Posted February 12, 2018 Share #82 Â Posted February 12, 2018 Did he men only his lenses, not those of Walter Mandler? Â He did say 'modern' Leica lenses. I took it to mean recent ones. Â Ernst Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernstk Posted February 12, 2018 Share #83 Â Posted February 12, 2018 Yes, he said this. I recall it well. It was nice meeting you, Ernst! Â And it was nice meeting you too Raid. It was a very enjoyable day. Â Ernst Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernstk Posted February 12, 2018 Share #84 Â Posted February 12, 2018 Well, actually that goes for old Leica lenses equally, seen within the context of their time. However, the fact that one CAN shoot a lens wide open does not imply that one HAS TO shoot it wide open all the time. The subject is the deciding factor. Â I agree. I was just sharing some context from Leica's lens designer... Â Ernst Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 12, 2018 Share #85 Â Posted February 12, 2018 Well, actually my remark was inspired by the implication of some posters that the aperture ring is a redundant ornament, and by Thorsten's rather rigid advice, and not really meant as a refutation of your post that I quoted. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jto555 Posted February 12, 2018 Share #86 Â Posted February 12, 2018 This thread is a howl! People getting out of shape over Thorsten shooting the photographs wide open. After exposer the use of the aperture ring is a personal choice. Funny I don't see any posts over people getting out of shape over people only shooting in B/W or only using natural light. Â Â Personally I only shoot all my photographs at 1/125 sec! I love the way that shutter speed renders... ; ) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted February 12, 2018 Share #87 Â Posted February 12, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) This thread is a howl! People getting out of shape over Thorsten shooting the photographs wide open. No they are not. What some people are disagreeing with is his alleged comment that stopping down is somehow a waste. If leaving the aperture glued wide open suits a particular stye, it's fine. But irrespective of the quality and capability of the lens, some believe that it's cost should not influence ones style. I too adhere to that principle. 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo98 Posted February 13, 2018 Share #88 Â Posted February 13, 2018 I use all of my lenses wide open most of the time. Not to justify their expensive prices, but because I love the out of focus areas, which I often think are the most interesting parts of an image. I think the genuine rendering of a lens is best shown here. Sharpness looks more or less equal with all lenses. Â Me too... 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted February 13, 2018 Share #89 Â Posted February 13, 2018 If the out of focus areas of my pics were the most interesting parts, I pick up another hobby. Â Jeff 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 13, 2018 Share #90 Â Posted February 13, 2018 I wouldn't. I would have far more keepers... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted February 13, 2018 Share #91 Â Posted February 13, 2018 True Leica men put filters with no hood on their lenses and take pics to show the blur around their subject matters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rus Posted February 13, 2018 Share #92  Posted February 13, 2018 (edited) I like f1.4 lenses because I like good image quality and I like shooting at f2. Make sense? No?  Then again, I like crushing garlic with my paper weight and eating noodles with a pair of scissors. Make sense? No?  A lens is like any other tool in the box. Use it however you want.  If what another has recommended suits you well, then by all means follow it. if not, then just change it. It’s not worth being bogged down by the swamp of opinions and preferences. Edited February 13, 2018 by Rus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adli Posted February 13, 2018 Share #93 Â Posted February 13, 2018 Me too... Â Â Now also on the Leica Forum 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo98 Posted February 13, 2018 Share #94 Â Posted February 13, 2018 Now also on the Leica Forum Timely... and very funny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted February 14, 2018 Share #95 Â Posted February 14, 2018 Me too... Without due process responses like "MeToo" will create havoc on our Leica life. People will be forever afraid of shooting wide open and I am afraid the Leica mystic will soon become a thing of the past. Let us all be careful before this thing gets out of hand. Â 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gelatino Posted February 14, 2018 Share #96  Posted February 14, 2018 This is my to-day decision: I will all day long shoot at f/3,4 ....with my SEM 21. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newnew Posted February 14, 2018 Share #97  Posted February 14, 2018 Reading through the posts and also being often on Thorsten's website looking at his pictures, I come to think that, as any word said in any book or by a religious leader, we may take Thorsten's words too literally and not in context. Thorsten has developed a "style" on his own by shooting wide open. If you look at his pictures these are mostly people, or singled out objects on relatively simple backgrounds. He has found and developed his shooting style around "full open" use of lenses that he has learned to master with very nice pictures.(By the way we have not seen ALL his photos , only the ones he posts while each of us sees ALL of our OWN photos) Some people may want to adapt this style and this is his school . One may discover and practice other "styles" with F2 to F 32 or with just one lens , with only blue color , etc.. etc.. The point is that Thorsten obtains a given signature with a specific statement which is "wide open". It is also similar to HCB's pictures taken with a 50 mm. I believe the problem is when we have not developed a given style or signature , either because we are not interested , or we have not been able to or that we have not matured there yet , we may find such a statement too restrictive or kind of "nonsense". 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted February 14, 2018 Share #98  Posted February 14, 2018 (edited) [../] The point is that Thorsten obtains a given signature with a specific statement which is "wide open". It is also similar to HCB's pictures taken with a 50 mm. [...]  HCB's favorite aperture was f/5.6 or f/6.3 if memory serves. As clear as i can recall, shooting at wide aperture was not trendy at all then, fast apertures were made for low light mainly. The trend was rather trying to catch the famous HCB's "decisive moment". Not that easy to say the least so the blur provided by full apertures has become a sort of substitute to more or less poor composition. Not a reason to reject optical blur of course and i don't know enough about Thorsten's later photography to criticize anything seriously about it. I have fond memories of discussions we've had on LUF 10+ years ago about the Digilux 1 when it was the first or one of the first digital Leicas but DoF was so wide at any aperture due to the small sensor that optical blur was difficult to obtain otherwise than in macro photo. Edited February 14, 2018 by lct 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.liam Posted February 14, 2018 Share #99  Posted February 14, 2018 HCB was a painter by training and where he returned to when his professional life ended so as ‘lct’ notes, his images taken at f/5.6-6.3 would reflect the tendency to capture that detailed scene in its entirely. Wide-open photography for the average schmo is the product of accurate autofocus, not the carefully staged or controlled event of a practiced hand. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newnew Posted February 14, 2018 Share #100 Â Posted February 14, 2018 (edited) My mention of HCB was to explain the concept of style. There is no judgment about comparing one "style" with the other "style". There are styles that a lot of people like and want to follow and other styles that are just very personal and not so popular. For instance in landscape photography , long exposure times to leave the water/waves blur is a very popular one. So common that it is no more the signature of a very personal style. Edited February 14, 2018 by newnew Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now