Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hopefully not going too much stray and off topic: Just out of curiosity how light or heavy it is? Also judging by the pictures of the persimmons is must not be easy to focus wide open.

 

Perhaps ask the owners of the Sonnetar for Leica-M, the srewmount-version might have a similar weight.

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m-lenses/262284-ms-optical-sonnetar-mc-f1-1-a.html

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137692

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134337

 

Or contact one of the dealers, f.e.:

MUST READ MS-Optical Sonnetar 50mm F/1.1 Black Paint Gold Letter, Silver, Perar Super Triplet 28mm F/4 Silver, Perar Super Triplet 35mm F/3.5 Silver

The MS Optical Sonnetar 50mm f/1.1 MC - Japan Camera Hunter

 

I have seen one Sonnetar-M and it's quite a very interesting lens, although the owner now prefers a Summilux 1.4-50mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a IIIc with Summitar 50/2 lens

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by gisling
missing character
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just about to purchase a Leica IIIc (converted to a IIIf).

 

I've been using a Zorki-1E (or -1D), liked the operation of it, decided to get a IIIc (f) because it seems a nice companion for my M4-2/Leicameter MC/Leicawinder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first one, a 1928 ((#28xxx) Leica being upgraded to Leica III in the 30's or 40's and in our family since ever. The camera (plus several pre war lenses and finders) was handed over to me by my (late) father nearly 40 years ago and used ever since by me as it was before by my family. This 86 years old lady was sent back to Leica only twice for a proper service in all this time and is still in perfect working order.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Kloss
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

1951 Leica IIIf.

1953 Leica Summicron 50mm f2.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica IIIf, different one. Maybe this one will work; I had it serviced.

Canon Serenar 85mm lens.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally jumped in to the LTM pool with a newly-acquired II. From what I can tell, it's from the initial 1932 batch, SN 83494. It's a well-worn beauty with the brass coming out in all the right places. I wish this camera could tell me its story! But it's telling my story now and it works beautifully. I had a camera-less 50/2 late model (coated) Summitar and now it has a place to reside. It's slightly front-heavy with the Summitar, I assume as opposed to the f/3.5 Elmar it would have originally had, but it's not an issue.

 

13947556717_f4d9cfe12b_z.jpg

 

13947612928_b0c3df6e6f_z.jpg

 

My prior LTM experience goes back to using my mom's IIIg; she's 83 now, still uses it and lets me borrow it when I come to visit every so often, so I can't claim it!

 

Cheers, Allan

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

My Barnack cameras:

 

• I model A with 50mm f3.5 Elmar

• I model C with 50mm f3.5 Elmar

• II model D with 50mm f3.5 Elmar

• IIIa model G with 50mm f3.5 Elmar

• IIIc with 50mm f2 Summitar

• IIIf RD ST with 50mm f2 Summicron

• IIIg with 50mm f2 Summicron

 

They look very pretty and tell a story of Leica through the years.

 

Regards, Jim

 

PS - I also have a Series 0 Replica with 50mm f3.5 Anastigmat - does it count as a Barnack?

Edited by jamesk8752
Add Series 0 Replica
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Minor update with Elmar relegated to storage box, and ORAKO - super item, almost makes the focussing operation instinctive. Curiously with the ORAKO it gives an almost anaglyphic experience with the red/green shifting colours.

Unfortunately doesn't help at all trying on focus on black printing on a brown paper back in dim lit scenes.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My iiif black dial. What a fantastic camera - feels better in the hand than my M3, has the best viewfinder of any Leica with the SBOOI attached, and the red scale elmar is the smoothest little 50. Prefer it in use to my MP, M6, and even the M3. BUT the limitation is the lenses - I could not give up the gorgeous photos coming out from the 50 summilux pre-asph or the summicron asph 35. Sigh.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

… BUT the limitation is the lenses - I could not give up the gorgeous photos coming out from the 50 summilux pre-asph or the summicron asph 35. Sigh.

As you may already know, both the 50 Summilux pre-asph and 35 Summicron asph were produced as a special edition in screwmount around the year 2000 for the Japanese market. They appear from time to time for sale in the usual places so you might not have to wait too long to pick them if you keep looking.:)

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes, there are LTM versions of those lenses. I have a Canon 1.4 which is much too big for the tiny iiif and makes it front heavy. My guess is the 50 summilux would be the same (too big to work well). The 35 summicron on the other hand....no, I can't and mustn't bring myself to have 2 Leica 35's that are the same. I already have 4 50s. It has to stop. I can't really use all that I already have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes, there are LTM versions of those lenses. I have a Canon 1.4 which is much too big for the tiny iiif and makes it front heavy. My guess is the 50 summilux would be the same (too big to work well). The 35 summicron on the other hand....no, I can't and mustn't bring myself to have 2 Leica 35's that are the same. I already have 4 50s. It has to stop. I can't really use all that I already have.

I agree the Canon 1.4 is too big for a IIIf, as is the excellent Voigtlander 50 1.4 Asph. I mostly use the later Canon 50 & 35 f1.8 lenses on mine - very nice size, handling, and images.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes, there are LTM versions of those lenses. I have a Canon 1.4 which is much too big for the tiny iiif and makes it front heavy. My guess is the 50 summilux would be the same (too big to work well). The 35 summicron on the other hand....no, I can't and mustn't bring myself to have 2 Leica 35's that are the same. I already have 4 50s. It has to stop. I can't really use all that I already have.

I know of a forum member who uses a IIIf and LTM 50 Summilux pre-asph and the relative size isn't an issue as far as he's concerned but I expect it would be a subjective matter.:)

 

Not trying to tempt you :D but if you had an LTM 35 Summicron you could use it on any of your IIIf, MP, or M6 with an adapter. Same with the Summilux and your current versions could help with funding the change over …

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just getting wind of this thread and would love to "stand up" and say that I regularly use a IIIg which is in a solid Ex+ to mint- condition as well as two lenses:

 

28mm summaron - w/o the hood

50mm elmar - w/ the hood

 

I love the 28mm for its miniscule size as well as its classic rendering. I have, however, noticed that it is very contrasty, and will probably start slightly reducing the development time in order to dial down the contrast. Anyone else experienced this? Anyone know where I can get a "user" lens cap for this lens?

 

I love the 50mm elmar for its ergonomics, size and rendering. Lately, I have been using the hood and focusing by turning the lens barrel (with my fingers on the hood) rather than using the focusing knob. I find the throw to be much shorter like this and much better. This lens works great on my M9 and MM as well. I find this lens also quite contrasty, although not as much as the 28mm summaron.

 

I've used the Leica half case with the this camera for a while but have had an ephiphany that it diminishes one of the star qualities of this camera, which is its compact size. So lately I've been going naked w/o any case. Hardly feel it around my neck :)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

My Leica II needed repairs, so I sent it back to the dealer; we made a deal to trade the II for a I Model E Standard and I must say I'm even more happy with it! I've since obtained the VIOOH Universal Finder and a 35/3.5 Summaron to complete the package.

 

14177432608_6c551db244_z.jpg

 

I'm in the process of putting it through it's paces; the shutter works like new... silky smooth! Cheers, Allan

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...