Jump to content

50 Elmar f/2.8 New Style


barnack

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 2 months later...
Guest Ron (Netherlands)
Improved version of the classic 50/2.8. If you are faced with the choice of the old or the new version, I would choose the new one. At medium f stops very hard to find any difference between it and the latest Summicron 50/2 at the same stop.

Teddy

 

Price wise there is hardly any difference eigter...;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I think I definitely made the right choice getting another Elmar 50 - bokeh or what?

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the former version?

 

I saw one today for a very interesting price. (350 euros)

Is it for B and W only?

What type of signature?

 

Does it fit the M8 without touching the shutter.?

What about IQ?

 

 

All comments very welcome.

Best regrads,

 

Jean-Luc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of pics here:

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (1962), f/2.8: http://tinyurl.com/ddz623

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (1962), f/2.8, 100% crop: http://tinyurl.com/dmv6lq

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (1962), f/2.8, flare: http://tinyurl.com/cvzw9h

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (2004), f/2.8: http://tinyurl.com/cd3t5p

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (2004), f/2.8, 100% crop: http://tinyurl.com/d55tq9

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (2004), f/2.8, flare: http://tinyurl.com/dhx5aa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Ron (Netherlands)
Couple of pics here:

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (1962), f/2.8: http://tinyurl.com/ddz623

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (1962), f/2.8, 100% crop: http://tinyurl.com/dmv6lq

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (1962), f/2.8, flare: http://tinyurl.com/cvzw9h

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (2004), f/2.8: http://tinyurl.com/cd3t5p

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (2004), f/2.8, 100% crop: http://tinyurl.com/d55tq9

 

Epson R-D1, Elmar-M 50/2.8 (2004), f/2.8, flare: http://tinyurl.com/dhx5aa

 

 

Thanks for the test, I only can see a clear difference in the last shot, where the 2004 lens is more sharp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the test, I only can see a clear difference in the last shot, where the 2004 lens is more sharp.

Yes the latest version is sharper and more contrasty, so beware of blown highlights if you shoot digital. Bokeh looks a bit smoother with the latest version as well. Otherwise, the barrel of the former Elmars (before 1994) rotates when focusing which can be a problem for polar filters. Also, former Elmars have a focus knob contrary to the latest version.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for tests and comments.

Beautiful lenses in any case.

 

It seems that the newer version is very difficult to find...

 

All the best,

Jean-Luc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, should stop thinking about selling my coded last version :eek: Whenever i see a MkII cat i could miss it :D

Give me a good reason why i should keep the latest Cron (which I thought, should replace the Elmar).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for tests and comments.

Beautiful lenses in any case.

 

It seems that the newer version is very difficult to find...

 

All the best,

Jean-Luc

Jean-Luc,

 

There's one advertised in the forum's Buy & Sell pages here.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys just make me spend money.

Just got this little beauty.

 

Cheers,

Agro

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do any members have this lens? If so, what is your impression of it?

Owned the new version, not 6 bit coded, and sold it because of the difficulty I had (purely my impression) in the focusing and aperture rings being separated by the gap between them when the lens is open. In many ways I regret getting rid of it because it is very sharp with a beautiful bokeh. I used it on my M8 with no damage to anything when collapsed but I do admit to holding my breath the first time I gingerly collapsed it into the chamber. The image that is downloaded here is much sharper than it appears here. I don't know why but lately when I download images to this site they look like crap.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow,

Who's that lovely dancer on the tarmac… ?:cool:

 

Thanks Hel-Stampes.

I decided to risk my life and laid flat in a middle of the road to take this.

Glad it was worth it...

Cheers

Agro

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...