Derbyshire Man Posted Saturday at 04:36 PM Share #461 Posted Saturday at 04:36 PM Advertisement (gone after registration) 2 minutes ago, hexx said: Just returned from the “town” and tried it out at Leica Mayfair store. I shall eat my words and correct what I’ve said about it before. It definitely is M rather than Q with M mount. It feels nice and solid in the hand like M11. It had 35 Lux on it and focusing was quite easy at 1.4. Tried few captures with and without magnification and it was tack sharp so that means, at least from that brief experience, that the EVF works well for focusing. Now I have a dilemma - should I sell Q3 and get this or not 😀 Yes, this was my experience and my thought process! I wouldn’t use it for 35/50 modern luxes but would be good for my pre-asph, tricky with focus shift, modified for close focus which exacerbates and happy to throw a flare when least expected/useful! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted Saturday at 04:36 PM Posted Saturday at 04:36 PM Hi Derbyshire Man, Take a look here Leica M EV1: The first M with EVF instead of Rangefinder. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
charlesphoto99 Posted Saturday at 04:40 PM Share #462 Posted Saturday at 04:40 PM 5 minutes ago, thighslapper said: This is typical Leica ..... wring as many variants as possible out of the original form factor and watch the well heeled jump for the latest model. Just wait... we still have MEV1-P, MEV1-M, MEV1-glossy paint, MEV1 - D (for that truly pure EVF experience) to go, and most likely some version with cosmetics by a B-list rock star. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M8X2 Posted Saturday at 04:52 PM Share #463 Posted Saturday at 04:52 PM vor 9 Minuten schrieb charlesphoto99: Just wait... we still have MEV1-P, MEV1-M, MEV1-glossy paint, MEV1 - D (for that truly pure EVF experience) to go, and most likely some version with cosmetics by a B-list rock star. These sound more like car models than cameras. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrMi Posted Saturday at 04:55 PM Share #464 Posted Saturday at 04:55 PM 32 minutes ago, lct said: Autozoom does work from infinity to 0.5m on my M11. Just checked with my Summicron 50/2 DR. Same with Skopar 50/2.2. Are you sure it does not work below 0.7m on the MEV1? I Verified that autozoom does not work for a range below 0.7m. However, that is a property of the lens. The lens stops reporting focus change (mechanically) once it is below 0.7m. I assume that all new CF lenses work the same way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreiPunkte Posted Saturday at 04:59 PM Share #465 Posted Saturday at 04:59 PM (edited) Yesterday I came in touch with the new toy The auto zoom immediately reminds me of the Leica III experience when photographing a band in a small club at close range and the III has a 1.5 x magnification factor in the rangefinder. At that moment I understand the 'Bang' when 'M-Class' entered the stage. Edited Saturday at 05:04 PM by DreiPunkte Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted Saturday at 05:12 PM Share #466 Posted Saturday at 05:12 PM 2 minutes ago, SrMi said: Verified that autozoom does not work for a range below 0.7m. However, that is a property of the lens. The lens stops reporting focus change (mechanically) once it is below 0.7m. I assume that all new CF lenses work the same way. Strange. No such issue on M11 with legacy Leica lenses, or Cosina made ZM and VM lenses. I have no experience with CF lenses but the WATE allows for autozoom closer than 0.7m too. Not a deal breaker but my MEV1 will work the same way as the M11 hopefully. Thanks for sharing anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted Saturday at 05:32 PM Share #467 Posted Saturday at 05:32 PM Advertisement (gone after registration) 19 minutes ago, lct said: Strange. No such issue on M11 with legacy Leica lenses, or Cosina made ZM and VM lenses. I have no experience with CF lenses but the WATE allows for autozoom closer than 0.7m too. Not a deal breaker but my MEV1 will work the same way as the M11 hopefully. Thanks for sharing anyway. ICT Why did you decide to purchase this EV1? Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrichie Posted Saturday at 05:37 PM Share #468 Posted Saturday at 05:37 PM 6 hours ago, Tseg said: Luckily, the top plate recycled from the M11-D parts bin saved about $1K a camera. and the back from the M11, with a hacked in Q3 EVF. Awesome design. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted Saturday at 05:47 PM Share #469 Posted Saturday at 05:47 PM 1 minute ago, algrove said: ICT Why did you decide to purchase this EV1? Thanks. The MEV1 matches the simple idea some of us did have since the beginning i.e. a mere M11 with an EVF in place of the RF. We were expecting a built-in Visoflex2 to reduce costs then but more resolution will do no harm hopefully. My reservation would come from the heath such resolution can cause but i shall see. 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted Saturday at 06:53 PM Share #470 Posted Saturday at 06:53 PM So if the SL2 with Maestro3 functions at 120 why does the EV1 only function at 60 with the same Maestro? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telecaster Posted Saturday at 07:08 PM Share #471 Posted Saturday at 07:08 PM 4 hours ago, elmars said: There is not enough space in the M11 cameras for the needed WiFi module. I hope they can change that for future M models. The Leica App is great compared to what other manufacturers offer + fast connectivity is the way to go. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elroustom Posted Saturday at 07:25 PM Share #472 Posted Saturday at 07:25 PM Everything but the price. I bet it's superb to handle. I wonder if they addressed the problem of looking through the finder with glasses on and not being able to see the whole frame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted Saturday at 07:33 PM Share #473 Posted Saturday at 07:33 PM 38 minutes ago, algrove said: So if the SL2 with Maestro3 functions at 120 why does the EV1 only function at 60 with the same Maestro? Heat dissipation in warm weather. THe same reason that it does not have video Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted Saturday at 07:37 PM Share #474 Posted Saturday at 07:37 PM 40 minutes ago, algrove said: So if the SL2 with Maestro3 functions at 120 why does the EV1 only function at 60 with the same Maestro? I keep my Q3 43 and SL3-S at 60 - I don't notice any deficiencies in visual quality, and it saves battery. But then I use those cameras only in AF. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixeleater Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM Share #475 Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM On 10/24/2025 at 8:06 AM, Jeff S said: Thought you might be relieved to know that the camera you own(ed) is better than you realized. 😉 Love my M10-R. 🙂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted Saturday at 08:37 PM Share #476 Posted Saturday at 08:37 PM 57 minutes ago, LocalHero1953 said: I keep my Q3 43 and SL3-S at 60 - I don't notice any deficiencies in visual quality, and it saves battery. But then I use those cameras only in AF. That's not an answer to my question, but an answer on what you do plus both the Q3 and SL3S have the maestro IV processor. I am looking for apples to apples explanations. Nevertheless, thank for trying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtai Posted Saturday at 08:38 PM Share #477 Posted Saturday at 08:38 PM (edited) If I can mount my 24mm Summilux onto the EV1 and see the entire frame like having a .58x for my 28mm Summicron then it’s reason enough to seriously consider it as a second camera to my M11M for a compact 24/35 travel kit like the old days with two .58 and .85x bodies with 28/50 Summicrons. I zone focus wide angles so EVF or not only the price matters. I’ll wait for a used one. Edited Saturday at 08:39 PM by rtai 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted Saturday at 08:43 PM Share #478 Posted Saturday at 08:43 PM (edited) . Edited Saturday at 08:44 PM by LocalHero1953 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted Saturday at 08:44 PM Share #479 Posted Saturday at 08:44 PM 6 minutes ago, algrove said: That's not an answer to my question, but an answer on what you do plus both the Q3 and SL3S have the maestro IV processor. I am looking for apples to apples explanations. Nevertheless, thank for trying. Apologies, it wasn't an answer - my post was just using yours as a generalised hook to hang a comment about the wish for 120fps. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlashGordonPhotography Posted Saturday at 08:53 PM Share #480 Posted Saturday at 08:53 PM 1 hour ago, algrove said: So if the SL2 with Maestro3 functions at 120 why does the EV1 only function at 60 with the same Maestro? Because battery life is already shorter with this camera. 230-270 shots. Compared to 700+++ with the M11. All of that is because of the EVF. Using 120fps would lower than even more. Gordon 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now