Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

SL & 24mm Summilux

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Leica has learned their lesson about putting out lens roadmaps and will be more careful next time, if there is a next time. I get that things change, there are delays etc, but Leica could have been more transparent, to say timelines have changed, or an announcement product is being reevaluated. Much better than silence and allowing gossip to flourish.

As for the 24mm, waiting for that, is only an exercise in frustration. If it is that important, there are several options including those from Sigma and Panasonic. If that isn’t good enough, then time to switch systems. I made a similar mistake with the 21, which thankfully did come to market , but waiting for a phantom lens is mistake I won’t be making again.
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Virob said:

I think Leica has learned their lesson about putting out lens roadmaps and will be more careful next time, if there is a next time. I get that things change, there are delays etc, but Leica could have been more transparent, to say timelines have changed, or an announcement product is being reevaluated. Much better than silence and allowing gossip to flourish.

As for the 24mm, waiting for that, is only an exercise in frustration. If it is that important, there are several options including those from Sigma and Panasonic. If that isn’t good enough, then time to switch systems. I made a similar mistake with the 21, which thankfully did come to market , but waiting for a phantom lens is mistake I won’t be making again.
 

 

Well, not wishing to be too cynical, but people are more likely to buy into a new system with a completely new lens mount if there is a 'roadmap' showing a whole load of luscious lenses appearing soon with names including 'APO' and 'ASPH'.  Maybe the original 'roadmap' was genuinely intended as a 'best case if everything goes really well' scenario and got taken over by events, or maybe customer* feedback indicated so much more interest in a 21mm f2/ than a 24mm f/2 that Leica put their effort into the 21.

* "customers" is an anagram of "curse most", not that that could possibly apply anyone who owns a Leica, we are all truly wonderful people, aren't we?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not going to wait for the 24 SL Cron. I will use my Super Symmar-S 24 via the Leica S-L adapter...that is, after the lens comes back from service, to replace the AF motor, for the second time. Seems I "stressed the gears too much" again, this time attaching it to an SL3...what would silly me expect from an €8k lens attached to a €7k camera via a €1.3k adapter? Hopefully they will use gears made of metal this time, instead of recycled toothpaste tubes. Going with the Zeitgeist, this will be my contribution to the health of the planet, the strength of my biceps and the balance of my bank account.

I use a 24mm prime quite often. Either the Elmarit Asph 2.8 which I find excellent even on the latest Monochrom, or the 30mm on the S3 (as in the image below). I am a sucker for the drama and intimacy brought by this wide focal length, without the "you blink and the perspective is off" issues that a 21mm lens often serves.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by albireo_double
  • Like 11
  • Thanks 4
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eclectic Man said:

a new system with a completely new lens mount

The lens mount is 10 years old, and the SL system is 9 years old.
Canon RF, Nikon Z mount: 6 years. 
Fujifilm's X-mount is 12 years old.
Sony's E-mount is ancient at 14 years.

Brought to you by your friendly Wikipedia interrogator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Eclectic Man said:

Well, not wishing to be too cynical, but people are more likely to buy into a new system with a completely new lens mount if there is a 'roadmap' showing a whole load of luscious lenses appearing soon with names including 'APO' and 'ASPH'.  Maybe the original 'roadmap' was genuinely intended as a 'best case if everything goes really well' scenario and got taken over by events, or maybe customer* feedback indicated so much more interest in a 21mm f2/ than a 24mm f/2 that Leica put their effort into the 21.

* "customers" is an anagram of "curse most", not that that could possibly apply anyone who owns a Leica, we are all truly wonderful people, aren't we?

Well……..does this count?

https://www.panasonic.com/content/dam/Panasonic/Global/Learn-More/L-Mount/L-MountLensChart_Zoom_20240222.pdf

https://www.panasonic.com/content/dam/Panasonic/Global/Learn-More/L-Mount/L-Mount-Lens-Chart_Fixed_Focal_Length_20240222.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trickness said:

Yeah, it is a shame. I think three is the minimum number of customers Leica needs to decide to make a lens.

They sold over 21,000 of them and then the desire waned off. Nobody buys nobody makes. I bought and I still use. I don’t need a new one. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, 24mm is nice, and so is APO, but I would prefer a real portrait lens. Don’t need the sharpness of APO. But a tighter F/L at 1.4 or less. Ofcourse I can buy Sigma, it’s here, but that aint money spend to Leica…

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 41 Minuten schrieb Olaf_ZG:

Honestly, 24mm is nice, and so is APO, but I would prefer a real portrait lens. Don’t need the sharpness of APO. But a tighter F/L at 1.4 or less. Ofcourse I can buy Sigma, it’s here, but that aint money spend to Leica…

 

+100

I have the SL75 and it's nice and sharp but I don't love it. Leica S120 on S body beats it by for my taste.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is not so much about a SL 24 APO lens (there are other options) but more about communication.

If we buy into a camera system we want to know what to expect, and also about the future.

SPecially from a brand which as discontinued the R system, the TL-System and the S-mount (have they? will there be an S4? will it have s-mount?) It would be nice to get some first hand information instead of having to rely on rumors and speculations.

Regarding options to Leica lenses... Sigma and Panasonic is nice, but that's not the reason one buys a camera body for 6800 Euro. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Olaf_ZG said:

Honestly, 24mm is nice, and so is APO, but I would prefer a real portrait lens. Don’t need the sharpness of APO. But a tighter F/L at 1.4 or less. Ofcourse I can buy Sigma, it’s here, but that aint money spend to Leica…

 

Buy a 75mm Noctilux. That’s a real portrait lens. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Smith said:

Buy a 75mm Noctilux. That’s a real portrait lens. 

I don’t own that lens, but have scrutinised many DNGs made with it, and am inclined to agree. It has an incredibly good blend of both sharpness and precision but also “character” (and not just wide open), IMHO, the latter aspect is something I’ve generally found missing (for my personal taste) in the SL 50, 35, 75mm APO Summicrons that I’ve owned.

Edited by Jon Warwick
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, John Smith said:

Buy a 75mm Noctilux. That’s a real portrait lens. 

I'm sure you're right. The Summilux-M 75 (which I have) is similar, I guess. I use it on the SL2-S, but only for want of an AF equivalent. I didn't buy the SL2-S for manual focusing, and would prefer an AF portrait lens. Between the Summilux-M 75 and the Apo-Summicron-SL 75 I'm doing OK at the moment though. It doesn't stop me thinking about a Summilux-SL 75 (or Noctilux-SL).

Edited by LocalHero1953
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jon Warwick said:

I don’t own that lens, but have scrutinised many DNGs made with it, and am inclined to agree. It has an incredibly good blend of both sharpness and precision but also “character” (and not just wide open), IMHO, the latter aspect is something I’ve generally found missing (for my personal taste) in the SL 50, 35, 75mm APO Summicrons that I’ve owned.

I guess @trickness would agree fully….

 

However, the Noctilux is slightly more expensive… 

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 21 Stunden schrieb John Smith:

Buy a 75mm Noctilux. That’s a real portrait lens. 

I would rather buy a Canon 85/1.2 plus a R5, nail focus even at sports and spend the rest of the money (about 5k) for a nice trip.

I am a big Leica fan but I can't see a buying a lens for such a price without AF. It's just too difficult to focus for anything but stills, and it's also too big if you use it on a M body. I am sure it renders great, if you get the shot. But getting the shot...

Manual focus is fine for me for wide angle ups to 50 or longer, but not so much for the super fast shallow DOF lenses.

Just give us a Leica SL 85/1.4 portrait rendering lens.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Olaf_ZG said:

I guess @trickness would agree fully….

 

However, the Noctilux is slightly more expensive… 

I do quite like the 75 SL APO though!. It has a character, although not a vintage one. Incredible cutting edge image quality and it's very versatile with weather sealing, AF, etc.

Took this image with it on the SL2 at night in the rain on the street.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...