Fred Miranda Posted January 10, 2023 Share #341 Posted January 10, 2023 Advertisement (gone after registration) 5 minutes ago, MarkP said: I emailed Leica a few days ago. I specifically explained that it was not vignetting due to light falloff but encroachment of the hood onto the corner of the image when a filter is fitted. Still awaiting a response but I did send it on a Friday. I'm sure Leica is aware of the issue by right now but I can't imagine an easy solution for this. Perhaps they are trying to ignore it and see if the chatter goes away. One idea would be for Leica to trim down the supplied rounded hood making it shorter. I know this works with third party metal hoods. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 10, 2023 Posted January 10, 2023 Hi Fred Miranda, Take a look here Reissue 35mm Summilux Pre-Asph V1 Steel Rim. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
hdmesa Posted January 10, 2023 Share #342 Posted January 10, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Fred Miranda said: I'm sure Leica is aware of the issue by right now but I can't imagine an easy solution for this. Perhaps they are trying to ignore it and see if the chatter goes away. One idea would be for Leica to trim down the supplied rounded hood making it shorter. I know this works with third party metal hoods. One of the others reporting the problem said it was forwarded to the "lens developers". Unless they tell you they sent your inquiry on, it's not gotten past the email gatekeeper that answered. Sometimes my emails to them got forwarded on right away, but at least one took a few rounds of back-and-forth explanation before they understood and sent it on to the engineering team (as it was a firmware issue). Edited January 10, 2023 by hdmesa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Miranda Posted January 10, 2023 Share #343 Posted January 10, 2023 1 hour ago, hdmesa said: One of the others reporting the problem said it was forwarded to the "lens developers". Unless they tell you they sent your inquiry on, it's not gotten past the email gatekeeper that answered. Sometimes my emails to them got forwarded on right away, but at least one took a few rounds of back-and-forth explanation before they understood and sent it on to the engineering team (as it was a firmware issue). My last reply also said that my inquiry was sent to "development". 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franka373 Posted January 11, 2023 Share #344 Posted January 11, 2023 Is it a significant crop to remove the vignetting? I was looking forward to lens until reading this thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirubadanieru Posted January 11, 2023 Share #345 Posted January 11, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Franka373 said: Is it a significant crop to remove the vignetting? I was looking forward to lens until reading this thread. With the hood, I tested it with the BW thin filter, and it's a very small vignetting, that can be easily cropped. That being said, I do not use the hood and the lens has (like most vintage lenses) a normal vignetting that can be corrected on Lightroom if one wants (without having to crop the picture). It's a great lens, the hood issue, while not ideal, is not a significant reason to not purchase the lens, unless you MUST 100% use a filter and a hood at all times. You can do the following with no negative impact to your photos, and still enjoy the amazing reissue: Use any of the hoods without a filter Use a filter without any of the hoods Use a filter + a 3rd party slimmer hood Use the lens without a filter and a hood Here's how it looks shot with a filter wide open, no hood The most important is the rendering, and to me its a perfect rendition of the original lens, which is now unattainable to most given the price / condition. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited January 11, 2023 by shirubadanieru 5 1 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/340261-reissue-35mm-summilux-pre-asph-v1-steel-rim/?do=findComment&comment=4636947'>More sharing options...
jakontil Posted January 11, 2023 Share #346 Posted January 11, 2023 4 hours ago, shirubadanieru said: With the hood, I tested it with the BW thin filter, and it's a very small vignetting, that can be easily cropped. That being said, I do not use the hood and the lens has (like most vintage lenses) a normal vignetting that can be corrected on Lightroom if one wants (without having to crop the picture). It's a great lens, the hood issue, while not ideal, is not a significant reason to not purchase the lens, unless you MUST 100% use a filter and a hood at all times. You can do the following with no negative impact to your photos, and still enjoy the amazing reissue: Use any of the hoods without a filter Use a filter without any of the hoods Use a filter + a 3rd party slimmer hood Use the lens without a filter and a hood Here's how it looks shot with a filter wide open, no hood The most important is the rendering, and to me its a perfect rendition of the original lens, which is now unattainable to most given the price / condition. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Typically why way of shooting 😀 no hood but filter 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Miranda Posted January 11, 2023 Share #347 Posted January 11, 2023 Advertisement (gone after registration) 13 hours ago, Franka373 said: Is it a significant crop to remove the vignetting? I was looking forward to lens until reading this thread. Don't let this discourage this from buying the 35/1.4 SR reissued. It's just something to be aware of when using filters. I absolutely love this lens and have been shooting with 35/1.4 v2 copies in the past. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted January 11, 2023 Share #348 Posted January 11, 2023 4 hours ago, Fred Miranda said: Don't let this discourage this from buying the 35/1.4 SR reissued. It's just something to be aware of when using filters. I absolutely love this lens and have been shooting with 35/1.4 v2 copies in the past. Agreed. I’m very happy with it otherwise. I’ve received no response from Leica a week after my first email. Have followed up with another expressing my displeasure with the lack of any response, even just an acknowledgement of my first email. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eab Posted January 12, 2023 Share #349 Posted January 12, 2023 My SR reissue has the wobbly aperture ring as well. I know this has been discussed here, do we have any idea if most of the re-issues have this problem or not. I saw the response from Leica above, but it would be good to know if the issue exists on 80% or 20%. Is there a way to take a poll on the forum? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crem Posted January 12, 2023 Share #350 Posted January 12, 2023 10 minutes ago, eab said: My SR reissue has the wobbly aperture ring as well. I know this has been discussed here, do we have any idea if most of the re-issues have this problem or not. I saw the response from Leica above, but it would be good to know if the issue exists on 80% or 20%. Is there a way to take a poll on the forum? Mine is wobbly. I assume they all are? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirubadanieru Posted January 12, 2023 Share #351 Posted January 12, 2023 19 minutes ago, eab said: My SR reissue has the wobbly aperture ring as well. I know this has been discussed here, do we have any idea if most of the re-issues have this problem or not. I saw the response from Leica above, but it would be good to know if the issue exists on 80% or 20%. Is there a way to take a poll on the forum? depends how wobbly it is, if you can show it in a video it might be easier to see if it's normal or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crem Posted January 12, 2023 Share #352 Posted January 12, 2023 (edited) I just noticed that my round hood (when attached directly to the lens) causes viewfinder blockage. Is this a defect with my lens and hood? The same hood has way less blockage if I use a B+W thin clear filter because it rotates the threads a bit more (dumb luck is my guess). Of course then I get the hard vignetting problem. @Fred Mirandaor anyone can you please confirm if you have this problem? At this point I'm not going to use hood with this lens. It's simply funny that I paid for two beautiful hoods that I'll never use. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited January 12, 2023 by Crem Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/340261-reissue-35mm-summilux-pre-asph-v1-steel-rim/?do=findComment&comment=4638481'>More sharing options...
Crem Posted January 12, 2023 Share #353 Posted January 12, 2023 (edited) Is this the wobble that we are talking about? The aperture ring has some play in it. The video makes it sound loud, but in real life it isn't. Probably because I held the microphone very close to the aperture ring. Edited January 12, 2023 by Crem Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darylgo Posted January 12, 2023 Author Share #354 Posted January 12, 2023 The aperture ring on my reissue has ( I thought) none of the issues I’m reading and now seeing here, rotation is smooth using either tab. When placing force on the tabs in a non-rotational forward-back direction I can feel some play, maybe 1mm, the ring then returns to seating position and is again smooth with proper rotational forces, good drag and the detents keep the ring as set until I place rotational forces again. Is this what is meant by those with the issue, non rotational forces movement? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted January 12, 2023 Share #355 Posted January 12, 2023 6 hours ago, Crem said: I just noticed that my round hood (when attached directly to the lens) causes viewfinder blockage. Is this a defect with my lens and hood? Surely a degree of viewfinder blockage is par for the course for any 35mm lens with a hood on a Leica? It's just something you learn to live with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonzo Posted January 12, 2023 Share #356 Posted January 12, 2023 (edited) vor 6 Stunden schrieb Crem: Is this the wobble that we are talking about? The aperture ring has some play in it. The video makes it sound loud, but in real life it isn't. Probably because I held the microphone very close to the aperture ring. It`s the same with my lens. The old copy didn`t have this. Edited January 12, 2023 by Wonzo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S Maclean Posted January 12, 2023 Share #357 Posted January 12, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Crem said: I just noticed that my round hood (when attached directly to the lens) causes viewfinder blockage. Is this a defect with my lens and hood? The same hood has way less blockage if I use a B+W thin clear filter because it rotates the threads a bit more (dumb luck is my guess). Of course then I get the hard vignetting problem. @Fred Mirandaor anyone can you please confirm if you have this problem? At this point I'm not going to use hood with this lens. It's simply funny that I paid for two beautiful hoods that I'll never use. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! This is normal. Once you get used to it you ain't notice the blockage. It does not disrupt the picture taking process Edited January 12, 2023 by S Maclean Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crem Posted January 12, 2023 Share #358 Posted January 12, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, wattsy said: Surely a degree of viewfinder blockage is par for the course for any 35mm lens with a hood on a Leica? It's just something you learn to live with. 2 hours ago, S Maclean said: This is normal. Once you get used to it you ain't notice the blockage. It does not disrupt the picture taking process Why build big vent holes and then not properly align them with the window? Did you look at my two photos? This seem like a manufacturing defect to me. The hood threads appear to be misaligned by about a quarter turn. Hopefully someone like @Fred Miranda can confirm on their copy if the hood vent holes are properly aligned or not. Edited January 12, 2023 by Crem 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crem Posted January 12, 2023 Share #359 Posted January 12, 2023 6 hours ago, darylgo said: The aperture ring on my reissue has ( I thought) none of the issues I’m reading and now seeing here, rotation is smooth using either tab. When placing force on the tabs in a non-rotational forward-back direction I can feel some play, maybe 1mm, the ring then returns to seating position and is again smooth with proper rotational forces, good drag and the detents keep the ring as set until I place rotational forces again. Is this what is meant by those with the issue, non rotational forces movement? Mine has a bit of play in the non rotational direction (shown in my video) and a similar amount in the rotational direction. Drag and detents work well. The play in both directions is at most 1mm like you said. I believe this is “normal” for this lens and part of the design. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Miranda Posted January 12, 2023 Share #360 Posted January 12, 2023 10 hours ago, Crem said: I just noticed that my round hood (when attached directly to the lens) causes viewfinder blockage. Is this a defect with my lens and hood? The same hood has way less blockage if I use a B+W thin clear filter because it rotates the threads a bit more (dumb luck is my guess). Of course then I get the hard vignetting problem. @Fred Mirandaor anyone can you please confirm if you have this problem? At this point I'm not going to use hood with this lens. It's simply funny that I paid for two beautiful hoods that I'll never use. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! I've noticed with some copies (like yours), when screwing the rounded hood, the opening would not end up in the right position for RF focusing, so it seems to vary from copy to copy. My personal copy allowed the hood to be screwed in right position for the RF but I've tested a loan copy which it did not. I would guess the issue is with the hood and not the lens but I'm not sure. My personal copy was back-focusing slightly, had stiff focus rotation towards the infinity position and also wobbly aperture ring. I sent it to New Jersey a month and a half ago and now it's in Germany. Leica told me they didn't have the necessary tools to adjust it in the US... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now