Jump to content

Dose anyone wanted Perspective Control in Leica M11 on Leica M11?


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Question: Does the function crop the image or does it “stretch” the pixels by interpolation? 

Go to ACR>Geometry and play with the Guided option (on the right). That is how automatic perspective correction is applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, jaapv said:

That is why I said you judge it in the optical  viewfinder and you can use content aware crop to expand a bit should you get it wrong. Nor can the camera correct the horizontal perspective. I don’t use Lightroom. Never liked it ;) BTW do you remember the hullabaloo when Leica dared to use that in-camera digital correction on the Q ? The sky had fallen… 

To appreciate Perspective Correction, I feel one must use it for a while. I was skeptical at first when beta-testing it.

Are you talking about Q's SDC? That is something very different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SrMi said:

Go to ACR>Geometry and play with the Guided option (on the right). That is how automatic perspective correction is applied.

That is not what I asked. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jaapv said:

Question: Does the function crop the image or does it “stretch” the pixels by interpolation? 

It does neither. Except if you are shooting a jpeg. In which case it crops the image. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

In-camera perspective control is such a useful feature because it allows you to compose in real time with a corrected upright perspective when shooting architecture. Especially when working in the 28-50 range. I loved it on the 10-P and I can’t wait to get it back on the M11.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but my question is: when it is applied does it compress the image on the side that must be shrunk, making a crop and thus loss of framing necessary or does it interpolate the side that must be expanded, causing resolution loss ? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I  use(d) PC all the time and AFAIK so does everyone else who has an M10-R and shoots DNG.  I have PC disabled as I find the guidelines distracting, but often I rely on it or at least check the result in LR as the PC data is stored independent of the image and is omnipresent regardless of whether it's enabled or not.  What I can't recall offhand is whether or not LV has to be enabled for the numbers to be stored... I think not, but I can't be definitive without going back and testing. The DNG transforms are, as noted above, only applied when commanded to do so in LR or CR.  In other words, if you have an M10-R, assuming the appropriate firmware level, you should be able to go into LR, click the guided perspective icon and get the PC version of the shot regardless of whether or not you enabled it in camera.

As for what's going on, it's not entirely clear, but whatever it is, for DNGs its externally performed by Adobe so whatever they do to implement PC in LR/CR, is likely what happens here as well. If I had to guess, and I do, all Leica PC does is pass along and automatically plug in the numbers that one would have generated by hand using LR's guided PC.  Note, that both use the same control button to initiate the transform.  So to answer you @jaapvwhatever Adobe does to alter the perspective is how M files are transformed via PC, AFAICT. 

It's obviously not magic and certainly doesn't save the day every time. But if one takes proper care, it can be quite useful. As for loss of fidelity, I find it undetectable in most circumstances.  Regardless Jaap, as we've all be told a million times around here, no one needs 40, let alone 60 Mpx, so even if a few pixies are dumped on the cutting room floor why all of a sudden would throwing a few of them away be a problem? 🤣

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, but given the magic qualities attributed to pixel count, it might be of interest to some, particularly the group who demand to be provided with the distorted part of the Q2 image. Correcting perspective in Postprocessing will have the same effects. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jaapv said:

Not really, but given the magic qualities attributed to pixel count, it might be of interest to some, particularly the group who demand to be provided with the distorted part of the Q2 image. Correcting perspective in Postprocessing will have the same effects. 

Whether you distort the parts manually or with the help of the data provided by the camera should not make any difference in image quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SrMi said:

Whether you distort the parts manually or with the help of the data provided by the camera should not make any difference in image quality.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2022 at 5:46 PM, LBJ2 said:

I have run into a few wonky situations too both with the in-camera feature and with the same feature when applied in Lightroom. I am sure my lens, the angle with which I held the camera relative to the angle/size of the subject and maybe a few other settings presents a total scenario the software doesn't know how to handle. I haven't been able to pin it down yet. But for the most part I've had pretty good results. But I do tend to use it for architecture or compositions that include architecture.

 

Probably because it can’t handle skew, because it can’t know your intention. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...