Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Here is some more on high ISO with the SL2-S.  First, I shot a long-scale scene, exposing for the white couch cushions in the center.  This was processed with a moderate lift to the shadows (+30 in Capture One):

S1010280 1 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 400

Then I extracted a region in the shade to the right at various ISOs to see how long the colors hold up and when the noise dominates:

S1010282 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 6400

S1010283 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 25000

S1010284 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 100,000

All shot with 35 SL APO SC

 

 

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Andy, very interesting.  I don't see as much chroma noise as I might have expected, which is encouraging, and the colours seem to hold up well.

For the record was the final shot ISO 50,000 or ISO 100,000?

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, scott kirkpatrick said:

Here is some more on high ISO with the SL2-S.  First, I shot a long-scale scene, exposing for the white couch cushions in the center.  This was processed with a moderate lift to the shadows (+30 in Capture One):

S1010280 1 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 400

Then I extracted a region in the shade to the right at various ISOs to see how long the colors hold up and when the noise dominates:

S1010282 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 6400

S1010283 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 25000

S1010284 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 100,000

 

 

I am sorry if I missed it but what lens were you using for this set of photos? Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, OR120 said:

I am sorry if I missed it but what lens were you using for this set of photos? Thank you.

The SL 35 Summicron.  I post these on Flickr.  If you click on a picture, you can check the exif information there.

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I know there are several C1 users. I have a question.

I did not want to spend additional money on software, so I did not buy C1. I use editing so rarely. And then I usually just use gimp, but only for basic changes.

Now I saw there is an express version of C1 (that is free). Can I use that version to edit DNG files ? Or do I need to buy a pro version with all features to be able to work on the Leica files ? As said that is far too expensive just for light use.

And which express version is “better” (for Sony or for Fuji) ?

Edited by caissa
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 1/5/2021 at 3:07 PM, scott kirkpatrick said:

 Does anyone know if Elsa Dorfman's 20x24" Polaroid camera and her work are still on exhibit somewhere?  I'll bet she used something like a giant Cooke lens from 150 years ago.

 

https://www.mfa.org/exhibition/elsa-dorfman-me-and-my-camera


https://www.digitalphotopro.com/profiles/an-interview-with-elsa-dorfman/

Excerpt...

Dorfman’s Equipment
Polaroid 20×24 camera (with bellows that extend to almost 60 inches, usually set between 28 to 34 inches)
Fujinon A 600mm f11 lens
Copal 3 shutter 
Broncolor lighting 

 

Edited by Jeff S
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...