beewee Posted January 6, 2021 Share #81 Posted January 6, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) 5 hours ago, scott kirkpatrick said: Well, I didn't use all of the frame, only the center quarter, so the upper left of these images was half-way to the corner. Ah, that’s good to know. Thanks for pointing that out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 Hi beewee, Take a look here Leica SL2-S: Versatile Alternative with 24MP Sensor. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
scott kirkpatrick Posted January 6, 2021 Share #82 Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) Here is some more on high ISO with the SL2-S. First, I shot a long-scale scene, exposing for the white couch cushions in the center. This was processed with a moderate lift to the shadows (+30 in Capture One): Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! S1010280 1 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 400 Then I extracted a region in the shade to the right at various ISOs to see how long the colors hold up and when the noise dominates: S1010282 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 6400 S1010283 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 25000 S1010284 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 100,000 All shot with 35 SL APO SC Edited January 6, 2021 by scott kirkpatrick 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! S1010280 1 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 400 Then I extracted a region in the shade to the right at various ISOs to see how long the colors hold up and when the noise dominates: S1010282 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 6400 S1010283 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 25000 S1010284 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 100,000 All shot with 35 SL APO SC ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/315955-leica-sl2-s-versatile-alternative-with-24mp-sensor/?do=findComment&comment=4113444'>More sharing options...
farnz Posted January 6, 2021 Share #83 Posted January 6, 2021 Thanks, Andy, very interesting. I don't see as much chroma noise as I might have expected, which is encouraging, and the colours seem to hold up well. For the record was the final shot ISO 50,000 or ISO 100,000? Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted January 6, 2021 Share #84 Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 100,000 Fixed now. 50,000 is better, when you look closely, but I didn't shoot it this time. Note that the highlight colors held up really well. Edited January 6, 2021 by scott kirkpatrick 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OR120 Posted January 6, 2021 Share #85 Posted January 6, 2021 5 hours ago, scott kirkpatrick said: Here is some more on high ISO with the SL2-S. First, I shot a long-scale scene, exposing for the white couch cushions in the center. This was processed with a moderate lift to the shadows (+30 in Capture One): Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! S1010280 1 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 400 Then I extracted a region in the shade to the right at various ISOs to see how long the colors hold up and when the noise dominates: S1010282 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 6400 S1010283 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 25000 S1010284 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr ISO 100,000 I am sorry if I missed it but what lens were you using for this set of photos? Thank you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted January 6, 2021 Share #86 Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 12 hours ago, OR120 said: I am sorry if I missed it but what lens were you using for this set of photos? Thank you. The SL 35 Summicron. I post these on Flickr. If you click on a picture, you can check the exif information there. Edited January 7, 2021 by scott kirkpatrick 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caissa Posted January 10, 2021 Share #87 Posted January 10, 2021 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) I know there are several C1 users. I have a question. I did not want to spend additional money on software, so I did not buy C1. I use editing so rarely. And then I usually just use gimp, but only for basic changes. Now I saw there is an express version of C1 (that is free). Can I use that version to edit DNG files ? Or do I need to buy a pro version with all features to be able to work on the Leica files ? As said that is far too expensive just for light use. And which express version is “better” (for Sony or for Fuji) ? Edited January 10, 2021 by caissa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slender Posted January 11, 2021 Share #88 Posted January 11, 2021 Try the full pro version (compatible with Leica SL2, s and S3) for free for a month. And then buy it on behalf of a student (juicy discount) you may know 😇 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted January 11, 2021 Share #89 Posted January 11, 2021 The Sony and Fuji versions of C1 only work with files from Sony or Fuji. The Pro version works for all cameras currently supported or supported in the past. And its license doesn't expire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jscottyk Posted January 31, 2021 Share #90 Posted January 31, 2021 Any opinions forming on the SL2-S performance with low ISO and long exposures? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bherman01545 Posted January 31, 2021 Share #91 Posted January 31, 2021 From actual use in low light, the SL2-S is at least 2-3 stops better in low light than its brother, the Leica SL2. The images are cleaner and have better color in low light as well. -Brad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted February 1, 2021 Share #92 Posted February 1, 2021 (edited) On 1/5/2021 at 3:07 PM, scott kirkpatrick said: Does anyone know if Elsa Dorfman's 20x24" Polaroid camera and her work are still on exhibit somewhere? I'll bet she used something like a giant Cooke lens from 150 years ago. https://www.mfa.org/exhibition/elsa-dorfman-me-and-my-camera https://www.digitalphotopro.com/profiles/an-interview-with-elsa-dorfman/ Excerpt... Dorfman’s Equipment Polaroid 20×24 camera (with bellows that extend to almost 60 inches, usually set between 28 to 34 inches)Fujinon A 600mm f11 lensCopal 3 shutter Broncolor lighting Edited February 1, 2021 by Jeff S 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now