Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I still struggle to comprehend the need for more MP. This image was taken on an MFT sensor @ 20 MP, cropped about 20%. I cannot imagine needing more resolution - just click it to its full uploaded 2480 Pixels:

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jaapv said:

I still struggle to comprehend the need for more MP. This image was taken on an MFT sensor @ 20 MP, cropped about 20%. I cannot imagine needing more resolution - just click it to its full uploaded 2480 Pixels:

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Is this real?  Shot with a telephoto?  If so, cropping a  full frame 40mp sensor to m4/3 dimensions is only 10mp, much less than your photo at 16mp.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Of course it is real and shot with a telephoto - I wouldn't be here posting otherwise. :lol: GX8 and DG Vario-Elmar 100-400.

He/she looks much more friendly with that combo, jaapv can you comment on the severe overbite?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, darylgo said:

 I'm heading to the Leica store today hoping they'll have the monochrome to see what my lenses and I can do with 40mp.  

Keep in mind that the M10 Monochrom, without a color array, behaves more like a 60-ish MP camera. The M246 will be closer in resolution to a 40 MP color based M.  

Jeff

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

5 minutes ago, Jeff S said:

Keep in mind that the M10 Monochrom, without a color array, behaves more like a 60-ish MP camera. The M246 will be closer in resolution to a 40 MP color based M.  

Jeff

Thanks, good to know, I can test for the mythical M11 although I know nothing of it but hear it mentioned quite frequently here on the forum.  

If the M246 is close to 40mp resolution the issues with the rangefinder and lenses (non color issues) should be well documented, I'll have to do a search.  

Thanks again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, darylgo said:

Thanks, good to know, I can test for the mythical M11 although I know nothing of it but hear it mentioned quite frequently here on the forum.  

If the M246 is close to 40mp resolution the issues with the rangefinder and lenses (non color issues) should be well documented, I'll have to do a search.  

Thanks again. 

Those issues have to do with the mathematical pixel count, not with the virtual one of a monochrome sensor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Those issues have to do with the mathematical pixel count, not with the virtual one of a monochrome sensor.

Oh noooooo, now I'm so confused 😜.   I'll test it and look at real images, it's easier on my brain. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think technical advancement of sensors will not only push MP up, but also dynamic range, low light capabilities etc

so a decision to upgrade is in most cases not just a „MP question“, it all goes synchronously up 

I would be interested in an M10R that offers additional sensor-based technological advancements. I just was force-upgraded to an M10-P from my M9 with sensor corrosion, and I don’t miss the M9 a second.

the argument „if you can’t take a good photo on 24MP, you won’t on 40MP either” is true ... but I can take a good photograph on 24, hence 40+ are of interest to me.

Computing power was mentioned - I use a regular 13” MacBookPro for my 50 MP Fuji GFX files ... no problem at all. 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, darylgo said:

Oh noooooo, now I'm so confused 😜.   I'll test it and look at real images, it's easier on my brain. 

The  alleged high-resolution issues have to do with pixel size, which is the same on a monochrome sensor as on a Bayer sensor at the same MP count   The main difference is the resolution loss by interpolation, which obviously won’t affect motion blur. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jaapv said:

The  alleged high-resolution issues have to do with pixel size, which is the same on a monochrome sensor as on a Bayer sensor at the same MP count   The main difference is the resolution loss by interpolation, which obviously won’t affect motion blur. 

But if he puts the M246 and on a tripod, he’ll likely get a better idea resolution-wise of print size/crop potential vis a vis the (predicted) 40 MP M10R than he would if he did the same with the M10M, which punches well above its 40 MP resolution weight.  Of course there are many other issues to consider when comparing cameras, especially with different generation technologies. Naturally the best way to test is to wait for the M10R, applying one’s own typical shooting and PP practices.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/2/2020 at 1:42 PM, jaapv said:

I still struggle to comprehend the need for more MP. This image was taken on an MFT sensor @ 20 MP, cropped about 20%. I cannot imagine needing more resolution - just click it to its full uploaded 2480 Pixels:

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

more resolution is usually problematic.  I have a canon 5dsr and can't get a RAW of less than 85 mb; sure there's a lot to look at and you can crop it to death, but the MB add up and are slow to download

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rnl said:

more resolution is usually problematic.  I have a canon 5dsr and can't get a RAW of less than 85 mb; sure there's a lot to look at and you can crop it to death, but the MB add up and are slow to download

I too use a 5DS. 

I am completely fine with having the extra MB. That's a given when you have more detail and image to look at. I am completely ok with that. Kinda ironic buying an M camera to "slow down" yet here we are complaining about waiting an extra 30 seconds to download files. Lol.

I welcome the more megapxiels in the next M.

Edited by maxfairclough
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, maxfairclough said:

I too use a 5DS. 

I am completely fine with having the extra MB. That's a given when you have more detail and image to look at. I am completely ok with that. Kinda ironic buying an M camera to "slow down" yet here we are complaining about waiting an extra 30 seconds to download files. Lol.

I welcome the more megapxiels in the next M.

The detail is incredible and so are the possibilities for blur.  in camera stabilization would be great for a large MB M.

 

 I love using the 5dsr for landscapes but only when it's on top of my gitzo tripod.

I don't regret the purchase (from Canon directly in their refurbished shop for about 1/2 the price of retail), but its a touchy camera, not a workhorse like my 1dxmii

Here are some examples 

 

https://richardnlipow.com/colorado-fall-2019

Edited by rnl
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/2/2020 at 1:42 PM, jaapv said:

I still struggle to comprehend the need for more MP. This image was taken on an MFT sensor @ 20 MP, cropped about 20%. I cannot imagine needing more resolution - just click it to its full uploaded 2480 Pixels:

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Crocodiles of the Zuiderzee?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...