Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I did something I said I wouldn’t do. Purchase SL lenses. I really want AF on the SL sometimes and I would like a 35mm. Since the 35 is not coming until next year, I thought I would pick up the 75 to use until then. I am anxious to try it out. Here’s to hoping the size is not going to make me pass out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a tough decision. After recently (August) dropping my M 2.4/75mm lens and having it sent it for repair (glass was fine) and still not having received it back, I really begin to question my deeper plunge into Leica. Repair time is outrageous. I have been using my SL with M lenses only and really thought that is how it would stay. I have the M21 and M.95/Nocti. My M10s are great cameras but the wife isn't all about manual focus like I am. 😬

The Fuji looks and appears to be a great camera. A really great camera. I like the rangefinder style. The 50R pushes all my buttons with the exception of not having the pancake lens ready until next year. I weighed out the pros and cons and decided that my Sony a7Riii was close enough to cMF that Fuji offered. So, against my better judgement, I purchased the 75SL and will wait on the 35SL. 😉 The 75 looks to be a performer and maybe a second SL will grace my door when they up the MP. Until then, I am going to enjoy my toys.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 6bit said:

It was a tough decision. After recently (August) dropping my M 2.4/75mm lens and having it sent it for repair (glass was fine) and still not having received it back, I really begin to question my deeper plunge into Leica. Repair time is outrageous. I have been using my SL with M lenses only and really thought that is how it would stay. I have the M21 and M.95/Nocti. My M10s are great cameras but the wife isn't all about manual focus like I am.

 

Funnily enough i am in the same boat. All M lenses on my SL and contemplating whether to buy a 90mm SL summicron. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 75mm was my first and only native L mount lens having been using M lenses. I've been using it as a portrait, environmental lens for the last 6 months and it's been a brilliant performer. The rendering is very pleasing to the eye.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, helged said:

Warning: The SL-primes are  v e r y  addictive.

Oh, oh yes.

I have for years been addicted to Ms and smaller cameras, eschewing DSLRs as being huge and heavy. And now I can't put the SL/50SL down. It's just so lovely.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2/75SL is not as big as I thought it would be. Especially after using the Nocti 50 on it. It is a big camera but not big in the same way as a DSLR. The body is thin so my mind makes it ok now. Still, I won't be giving up my Ms. I would let go of the SL first. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Summicron-SL 75 is the finest lens I have ever had the pleasure of using.  It is a perfect fit for the SL body, and the image quality is simply amazing.  I am tempted to pick up the Summicron 90, as well, but so far I have resisted since I already have the Vario Elmarit 24-90, which is a great lens in its own right, albeit somewhat larger then the 75 and 90 primes.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

I don't have the 75. As a 50mm guy I got the 90 to compliment the SL50 'lux. The 90 is also stunning and now I'm thinking about the 50 Summicron as well......

must resist.....

Gordon

I didn't think I'd buy an SL, but picked one up last week and a 90mm will be here on Tuesday. If these Summicrons are what Leica and everybody says they are, I might be trading in my S.

 

Edited by Agent M10
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/19/2018 at 1:19 AM, hteasley said:

I have for years been addicted to Ms and smaller cameras, eschewing DSLRs as being huge and heavy. And now I can't put the SL/50SL down. It's just so lovely.

Same for me.  The little lenses are great.  Expensive, but the only way of getting compact gear on a full-frame camera in modern times.  However, the SL lenses produce images that are so much cleaner than the Summi/Noctilux M lenses at least, that I have embraced them, despite their being bigger, in general, than the Nikon lenses that I started with.  Makes the world go around, I suppose.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...