Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I did something I said I wouldn’t do. Purchase SL lenses. I really want AF on the SL sometimes and I would like a 35mm. Since the 35 is not coming until next year, I thought I would pick up the 75 to use until then. I am anxious to try it out. Here’s to hoping the size is not going to make me pass out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear! I’m really partial to my M cameras and M lenses.

For me, the 35 and 75 take care of most of what I shoot with the SL. A 21 would round it out.

I’ll be sure to post back  

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a tough decision. After recently (August) dropping my M 2.4/75mm lens and having it sent it for repair (glass was fine) and still not having received it back, I really begin to question my deeper plunge into Leica. Repair time is outrageous. I have been using my SL with M lenses only and really thought that is how it would stay. I have the M21 and M.95/Nocti. My M10s are great cameras but the wife isn't all about manual focus like I am. 😬

The Fuji looks and appears to be a great camera. A really great camera. I like the rangefinder style. The 50R pushes all my buttons with the exception of not having the pancake lens ready until next year. I weighed out the pros and cons and decided that my Sony a7Riii was close enough to cMF that Fuji offered. So, against my better judgement, I purchased the 75SL and will wait on the 35SL. 😉 The 75 looks to be a performer and maybe a second SL will grace my door when they up the MP. Until then, I am going to enjoy my toys.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 6bit said:

It was a tough decision. After recently (August) dropping my M 2.4/75mm lens and having it sent it for repair (glass was fine) and still not having received it back, I really begin to question my deeper plunge into Leica. Repair time is outrageous. I have been using my SL with M lenses only and really thought that is how it would stay. I have the M21 and M.95/Nocti. My M10s are great cameras but the wife isn't all about manual focus like I am.

 

Funnily enough i am in the same boat. All M lenses on my SL and contemplating whether to buy a 90mm SL summicron. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 75mm was my first and only native L mount lens having been using M lenses. I've been using it as a portrait, environmental lens for the last 6 months and it's been a brilliant performer. The rendering is very pleasing to the eye.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, helged said:

Warning: The SL-primes are  v e r y  addictive.

Oh, oh yes.

I have for years been addicted to Ms and smaller cameras, eschewing DSLRs as being huge and heavy. And now I can't put the SL/50SL down. It's just so lovely.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2/75SL is not as big as I thought it would be. Especially after using the Nocti 50 on it. It is a big camera but not big in the same way as a DSLR. The body is thin so my mind makes it ok now. Still, I won't be giving up my Ms. I would let go of the SL first. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Summicron-SL 75 is the finest lens I have ever had the pleasure of using.  It is a perfect fit for the SL body, and the image quality is simply amazing.  I am tempted to pick up the Summicron 90, as well, but so far I have resisted since I already have the Vario Elmarit 24-90, which is a great lens in its own right, albeit somewhat larger then the 75 and 90 primes.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

I don't have the 75. As a 50mm guy I got the 90 to compliment the SL50 'lux. The 90 is also stunning and now I'm thinking about the 50 Summicron as well......

must resist.....

Gordon

I didn't think I'd buy an SL, but picked one up last week and a 90mm will be here on Tuesday. If these Summicrons are what Leica and everybody says they are, I might be trading in my S.

 

Edited by Agent M10
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/19/2018 at 1:19 AM, hteasley said:

I have for years been addicted to Ms and smaller cameras, eschewing DSLRs as being huge and heavy. And now I can't put the SL/50SL down. It's just so lovely.

Same for me.  The little lenses are great.  Expensive, but the only way of getting compact gear on a full-frame camera in modern times.  However, the SL lenses produce images that are so much cleaner than the Summi/Noctilux M lenses at least, that I have embraced them, despite their being bigger, in general, than the Nikon lenses that I started with.  Makes the world go around, I suppose.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...