Jump to content

NEW M.. This year.. This Fall...


EdwardM

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Perhaps the reason so many professionals no longer use Leica [emoji3]

I often think the "Pro-use" thing is a red herring. Canikon produces sooo many cameras. They need pros but mostly to set up a scenario of pro usage in order to shill to the wannabes. They would go out of business if only pros bought their stuff. A lot of bloggers would disappear too; not enough eyeballs.

 

I should just check out until the dog and pony show is over. Then I could get the real dirt.

 

s-a

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It seems the worse part about this rumor is zero discussion about a new M.

 

In some ways there is a contentment for us M owners right now knowing that the new M may not be announced until Photokina 2016.  We can enjoy the excellent M240 with our collection of top notch lenses for another year assuming, the new M will only be that much better by the end of next year... and we can concentrate on photography while we watch the SL introduction unfold over at least the next year.

 

So, no news about a new M may be good news.  :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So, no news about a new M may be good news.  :D

 

 

Agree. And improvements will come, it's only a question of time. No problems enjoying the existing M system until (and beyond) 2016... Despite of it's well-known deficiencies, I find the M-system particularly useful due to the combination of high quality optics and relative low weight/size factor (with the 50-Noct as an exception to the weight/size rule).

 

For me, shifting to the SL-system is only an option if it turns out that the quality-size-weight mix is clearly favourable compared to the M-system. Although the weight and size of the SL body might be similar to the M, the guestimated zoom-lenses appear rather large. Autofocus is not high up on the priority list for me, at least for the time being. Exciting times nevertheless. And it will be interesting to learn how the new system will handle M, R and other brand lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

For me, shifting to the SL-system is only an option if it turns out that the quality-size-weight mix is clearly favourable compared to the M-system. Although the weight and size of the SL body might be similar to the M, the guestimated zoom-lenses appear rather large. Autofocus is not high up on the priority list for me, at least for the time being. Exciting times nevertheless. And it will be interesting to learn how the new system will handle M, R and other brand lenses.

Agreed - The mix needs to be favorable. One of the reason I came to the M system was the small form factor in relation to DSLR's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, post #1490.... services, in addition to gear needs, as the photographer defines.

 

Jeff

This is right, I shoot with Leica's professionally and have a fast turnaround of repairs (<1 week) once you register your company with Wetzlar. The other key differentiator with an amateur of whatever ability is that I need kit to work under pressure and work reliably, if I don't fulfill the brief then I don't get paid which does concentrate the mind rather.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Yep, post #1490.... services, in addition to gear needs, as the photographer defines.

 

Jeff

This is right, I shoot with Leica's professionally and have a fast turnaround of repairs (<1 week) once you register your company with Wetzlar. The other key differentiator with an amateur of whatever ability is that I need kit to work under pressure and work reliably, if I don't fulfill the brief then I don't get paid which does concentrate the mind rather.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 Anyway, I have to say this: 1.when the M8 is "stable", and all problems are sorting out, the camera is nice, beautiful and the images (2.at low ISOs) are wonderful. 

 

The S, T, and the M family is great... the S(007) and the Q are a hint on how far Leica can go today... those cameras are second to none. 

 

The new system will show those high standards, sure. This is the right moment to do it. 

 

The price will be high but 3.this is the price of excellence!

 

(We Europeans should be 4.proud of those German & Portuguese factories).

 

I'll comment on the areas I have boldened from your post:

 

1. When is definitely the key word there ;)

2. Does that mean that the images at high ISO are not so wonderful?

3. In view of the 2 points above (as well as the numerous other problems that have been well documented in this forum in relation to M, Q and other models) I would love to know your definition of excellence. :huh:

4. Of course, we can be proud, and certainly pay the price for it. Because if those factories were in China the whole world would still be proud of them and would certainly pay a lot less for pride (and the customer base would very likely grow as a result of cheaper prices).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree. And improvements will come, it's only a question of time. No problems enjoying the existing M system until (and beyond) 2016... Despite of it's well-known deficiencies, I find the M-system particularly useful due to the combination of high quality optics and relative low weight/size factor (with the 50-Noct as an exception to the weight/size rule).

 

For me, shifting to the SL-system is only an option if it turns out that the quality-size-weight mix is clearly favourable compared to the M-system. Although the weight and size of the SL body might be similar to the M, the guestimated zoom-lenses appear rather large. Autofocus is not high up on the priority list for me, at least for the time being. Exciting times nevertheless. And it will be interesting to learn how the new system will handle M, R and other brand lenses.

Exactly as my thoughts... supposed the SL is weight/size not far from M... I admit that going out with a 24/90 can be more comfortable than with 3 primes... but for my amateur's attitudes this is MARGINAL... won't spend 10K for this...  there MUST be something else to have a "clearly favourable comparision"... oh well... let's wait,,, :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly as my thoughts... supposed the SL is weight/size not far from M... I admit that going out with a 24/90 can be more comfortable than with 3 primes... but for my amateur's attitudes this is MARGINAL... won't spend 10K for this...  there MUST be something else to have a "clearly favourable comparision"... oh well... let's wait,,, :rolleyes:

 ...... and it will certainly give good indication of what will be in the next M successor ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll comment on the areas I have boldened from your post:

 

1. When is definitely the key word there ;)

2. Does that mean that the images at high ISO are not so wonderful?

3. In view of the 2 points above (as well as the numerous other problems that have been well documented in this forum in relation to M, Q and other models) I would love to know your definition of excellence. :huh:

4. Of course, we can be proud, and certainly pay the price for it. Because if those factories were in China the whole world would still be proud of them and would certainly pay a lot less for pride (and the customer base would very likely grow as a result of cheaper prices).

 

1. That is why the word "when" is there.

2. I avoid using the camera at high ISO values, due to the dynamic range compression and detail, tonality and color deterioration.

3. Excellence means high standards: materials, precision, design, and output quality (images).

4. I am not Chinese. It is difficult to establish a strong competition in electronics from Europe. Not even the giant Kodak was able to do the same from USA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sure will be glad when the announcement comes as I am tired of reading what we all want and think the next camera from Leica will have in its body. Then the next round of threads will appear most of which will again be useless, unless the thread is written by someone who has had hands-on use of this new wonder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is right, I shoot with Leica's professionally and have a fast turnaround of repairs (<1 week) once you register your company with Wetzlar. The other key differentiator with an amateur of whatever ability is that I need kit to work under pressure and work reliably, if I don't fulfill the brief then I don't get paid which does concentrate the mind rather.

 

Fast turnaround of repairs only applies to those living in the northern hemisphere near main population centres. Then it takes weeks not months as is the case here. Best to find an independent service centre. That applies for other makes, too, of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...