Jump to content

Only one lens...


Rick

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Easy question, easy answer ;)

 

My consideration would be:

- having only one lense for the rest of my life, it should be fast -> f 1.4 or f 0.95

- on the other hand it should be easy to carry -> not f 0.95

- it has to compromise landscape as well as portrait -> 35 or 50 mm

 

-> intermediate result: Summilux 35 or Summilux 50

 

BUT

knowing it will not remain the only lense:

- it should allow to argue for a wider lense, e.g. 28 mm

 

-> my winner would be the Summilux 50

 

Klaus

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't have a fortune to loose.

It's a tough question in a way (for me anyway), because I use both 35 mm and 50 mm a lot.

At the end of last year I went to London with my family, and tried getting some environmental shots with the Fuji X-T1 and 27 mm pancake (40 mm equivalent) -- I found it a bit long at times, and felt that wider would have been more useful. So based on this recent experience, I'd have to say I would keep only the 35 mm APSH FLE.

 

If you were to extend the question to an M camera body, then I'd have to keep the Monochrom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As we're talking hypothetically, the only issue would be image quality for me.

 

Practically, 35 Summilux FLE. But that's not talking with my heart. The quandary for me is I like long(ish) and wide, so that would suggest 75 Summilux AND 21 Summilux.

 

Okay burning house and I can grab one lens - Noctilux 0.95. My most used focal length, and a lens of wonderful character (75 Summilux following closely).

 

Oh, and Monochrom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...