Jump to content

80-200/4 zoom?


germio

Recommended Posts

Some say this lens is very close to the fabled 70-180/2.8 in image quality which would make it quite a steal at current used prices. Any thoughts?

 

An excellent lens, I no longer have it but I had no hestiation about using it at any aperture or focal length. Excellent flare resistance & color saturation, good bokeh, solid "Leica" construction, and the filter threads don't rotate :) A bargain among Leica lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very compact / light weight compared to the 70-180. For a lot of people this is the only telephoto they'll need.
Well, compared to that one anything is compact and lightweight.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pete, yes it worked very well in terms of image quality, yet focusing appeared a bit difficult to me. On one hand it gets a bit dark and on the other it appeared as if the focusing throw was like half of the non-extended version making it a challenge to hit the spot.

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pete, yes it worked very well in terms of image quality, yet focusing appeared a bit difficult to me. On one hand it gets a bit dark and on the other it appeared as if the focusing throw was like half of the non-extended version making it a challenge to hit the spot.

Thanks, Martin, that's very interesting because I hadn't noticed the throw difference with the non-APO extender. :)

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

80-200mm Lens.

 

Love it.

 

As for Digital, tried it on the Canon 5D-II and it was great.

 

Ken.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Martin, that's very interesting because I hadn't noticed the throw difference with the non-APO extender. :)

 

Pete.

 

Pete, hope you didn't get me wrong. i compared it with or without the apo-extender. I do not have the non-apo version for comparison.

 

F8 was eventually the reason why I moved to the apo 2.8/180.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
80-200mm Lens.

 

Love it.

 

As for Digital, tried it on the Canon 5D-II and it was great.

 

Ken.

 

What is this around the lens you are showing in your photo? the post is a bit dated but it would be helpful to me. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is this around the lens you are showing in your photo?

 

It's the Leica STA-1 tripod collar, originally made for the 100 APO but with slight modification can be used on the 80-200mm f/4 (also fits the 180mm f/2.8 APO with no modification). The modification is to either remove the red bump from the lens or trim one of the ridges on the inside of the collar to clear the bump.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the Leica STA-1 tripod collar, originally made for the 100 APO but with slight modification can be used on the 80-200mm f/4 (also fits the 180mm f/2.8 APO with no modification). The modification is to either remove the red bump from the lens or trim one of the ridges on the inside of the collar to clear the bump.

 

There is also excellent Arca Swiss compatible lens collar made by Burzynsky and sold by ISARFOTO in Germany - works on APO Macro Elmarit 100mm, APO Elmarit 180mm and zoom in question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an excellent lens. However, the main reason I have the 70-180mm, in spite of the larger size, is that I find it much easier to critically focus, and also the fact that the wide opening makes it more versatile as a replacement for primes in it's range. Also, of course, it's overall performance is somewhat better!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...